World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Ecology and Evolution 42 5470 5281 1870 1793 76 9368

Heather R. McCarthy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Heather R. McCarthy between 2001 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Heather R. McCarthy published across 26 years, from 2001 to 2026, averaging 3.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2006. 5 of the 88 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2006. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 0 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 4 publications 2026: 1 publication
2001 2026

88 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Heather R. McCarthy: publications per year, 2001 to 2026
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 0
2003 1
2004 1
2005 3
2006 11
2007 2
2008 3
2009 2
2010 6
2011 5
2012 5
2013 7
2014 6
2015 7
2016 3
2017 3
2018 7
2019 1
2020 1
2021 1
2022 0
2023 5
2024 2
2025 4
2026 1
Total 88
Download as CSV

Heather R. McCarthy publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Heather R. McCarthy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 37–41 to 531+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 333. Most scientists, 333, have 97–101 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 72–76 publications, is where this scientist sits. 37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37–41 publications 531+

This scientist: 76 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
37–41 2
42–46 9
47–51 10
52–56 31
57–61 56
62–66 91
67–71 92
72–76 127 76
77–81 173
82–86 236
87–91 227
92–96 240
97–101 333
102–106 280
107–111 300
112–116 285
117–121 305
122–126 287
127–131 278
132–136 289
137–141 273
142–146 262
147–151 246
152–156 235
157–161 205
162–166 199
167–171 174
172–176 164
177–181 173
182–186 189
187–191 170
192–196 139
197–201 128
202–206 117
207–211 115
212–216 107
217–221 124
222–226 81
227–231 82
232–236 85
237–241 75
242–246 66
247–251 81
252–256 69
257–261 70
262–266 55
267–271 64
272–276 49
277–281 48
282–286 44
287–291 45
292–296 36
297–301 39
302–306 38
307–311 30
312–316 34
317–321 25
322–326 22
327–331 28
332–336 30
337–341 22
342–346 30
347–351 26
352–356 22
357–361 29
362–366 21
367–371 12
372–376 18
377–381 17
382–386 13
387–391 21
392–396 13
397–401 10
402–406 15
407–411 8
412–416 9
417–421 8
422–426 4
427–431 10
432–436 10
437–441 5
442–446 4
447–451 10
452–456 2
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 7
472–476 6
477–481 6
482–486 3
487–491 3
492–496 4
497–501 4
502–506 8
507–511 5
512–516 4
517–521 5
522–526 4
527–530 5
531+ 100
Download as CSV

Heather R. McCarthy D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Heather R. McCarthy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 92 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 121+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 280. Most scientists, 280, have 40 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 95
31 123
32 191
33 245
34 252
35 244
36 249
37 244
38 254
39 254
40 280
41 274
42 266 42
43 233
44 248
45 208
46 201
47 213
48 207
49 172
50 209
51 199
52 153
53 169
54 163
55 148
56 120
57 146
58 137
59 140
60 104
61 119
62 118
63 99
64 77
65 100
66 86
67 83
68 75
69 94
70 57
71 68
72 59
73 63
74 66
75 60
76 42
77 49
78 39
79 37
80 43
81 41
82 45
83 34
84 40
85 35
86 55
87 24
88 24
89 30
90 23
91 25
92 27
93 27
94 13
95 23
96 12
97 14
98 19
99 16
100 14
101 5
102 21
103 16
104 10
105 7
106 7
107 7
108 6
109 9
110 11
111 12
112 9
113 7
114 3
115 8
116 5
117 11
118 4
119 2
120 5
121+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Heather R. McCarthy is affiliated with the University of Oklahoma in the United States. Their research primarily lies within the field of Environmental Science, with a particular focus on subfields including Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Small Animals, and Agronomy and Crop Science.

Their scholarly work encompasses a diverse set of topics related to ecological and agricultural systems. Key topics include Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, Remote Sensing in Agriculture, Animal Health and Immunology, Reproductive Physiology in Livestock, Forest Ecology and Management, Coastal Wetland Ecosystem Dynamics, and Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies.

Heather R. McCarthy has contributed to multiple peer-reviewed publications. Recent papers include:

  • "Assessing impacts of climate change on selected foundation species and ecosystem services in the South-Central USA," 2023, published in Ecosphere
  • "Effects of supplementing colostrum beyond the first day of life on growth and health parameters of preweaning Holstein heifers," 2023, published in Journal of Dairy Science
  • "The response of coarse root biomass to long-term CO2 enrichment and nitrogen application in a maturing Pinus taeda stand with a large broadleaved component," 2021, published in Global Change Biology
  • "A comparison of moderate and high spatial resolution satellite data for modeling gross primary production and transpiration of native prairie, alfalfa, and winter wheat," 2023, published in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • "Simple and Innovative Methods to Estimate Gross Primary Production and Transpiration of Crops: A Review," 2023, published in Studies in big data

Frequent collaborators in their research include Ram Oren, Lucy Schroeder, Laura Ostrowsky, Cathleen Lapadat, and Andrew L. Hipp. These coauthors have worked with McCarthy on multiple occasions, reflecting ongoing collaborative efforts within their scientific community.

Heather R. McCarthy has published several works in prominent scientific journals, with repeated contributions especially in the Journal of Dairy Science. Other common venues for their research include Ecosphere, Global Change Biology, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, and Studies in big data.

Best Publications

  • Soil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in a CO 2 -enriched atmosphere

    Ram Oren;David S Ellsworth;David S Ellsworth;Kurt H Johnsen;Nathan C. Phillips

  • Forest response to elevated CO2 is conserved across a broad range of productivity.

    Richard J. Norby;Evan H. DeLucia;Birgit Gielen;Carlo Calfapietra

  • Increases in the flux of carbon belowground stimulate nitrogen uptake and sustain the long‐term enhancement of forest productivity under elevated CO2

    John E. Drake;Anne Gallet-Budynek;Anne Gallet-Budynek;Kirsten S. Hofmockel;Emily S. Bernhardt

  • Evaluation of 11 terrestrial carbon–nitrogen cycle models against observations from two temperate Free‐Air CO2 Enrichment studies

    Soenke Zaehle;Belinda E. Medlyn;Martin G. De Kauwe;Anthony P. Walker

  • Using ecosystem experiments to improve vegetation models

    Belinda E Medlyn;Belinda E Medlyn;Sonke Zaehle;Martin G De Kauwe;Anthony P Walker

  • Re-assessment of plant carbon dynamics at the Duke free-air CO 2 enrichment site: interactions of atmospheric [CO 2 ] with nitrogen and water availability over stand development

    Heather R. McCarthy;Heather R. McCarthy;Ram Oren;Kurt H. Johnsen;Anne Gallet‐Budynek

  • Elevated CO2 increases tree‐level intrinsic water use efficiency: insights from carbon and oxygen isotope analyses in tree rings across three forest FACE sites

    Giovanna Battipaglia;Giovanna Battipaglia;Matthias Saurer;Paolo Cherubini;Carlo Calfapietra

  • Transpiration of urban forests in the Los Angeles metropolitan area

    Diane E. Pataki;Heather R. McCarthy;Elizaveta Litvak;Stephanie Pincetl

  • PROGRESSIVE NITROGEN LIMITATION OF ECOSYSTEM PROCESSES UNDER ELEVATED CO2 IN A WARM-TEMPERATE FOREST

    Adrien C. Finzi;David J.P. Moore;Evan H. DeLucia;John Lichter

  • Where does the carbon go? A model-data intercomparison of vegetation carbon allocation and turnover processes at two temperate forest free-air CO2 enrichment sites.

    Martin G. De Kauwe;Belinda E. Medlyn;Sönke Zaehle;Anthony P. Walker

  • Separating the effects of climate and vegetation on evapotranspiration along a successional chronosequence in the southeastern US

    Paul C. Stoy;Gabriel G. Katul;Mario B. S. Siqueira;Jehn-Yih Juang

  • Estimating the uncertainty in annual net ecosystem carbon exchange: spatial variation in turbulent fluxes and sampling errors in eddy‐covariance measurements

    Ram Oren;Cheng-I. Hsieh;Cheng-I. Hsieh;Paul C. Stoy;John Albertson

  • Variability in net ecosystem exchange from hourly to inter-annual time scales at adjacent pine and hardwood forests: a wavelet analysis.

    Paul C. Stoy;Gabriel G. Katul;Mario B. S. Siqueira;Jehn-Yih Juang

  • Aboveground sink strength in forests controls the allocation of carbon below ground and its (CO 2 )-induced enhancement

    Sari Palmroth;Ram Oren;Heather R. McCarthy;Kurt H. Johnsen

  • Variable conductivity and embolism in roots and branches of four contrasting tree species and their impacts on whole-plant hydraulic performance under future atmospheric CO2 concentration

    Jean-Christophe Domec;Karina Schäfer;Ram Oren;Hyun S. Kim

  • Contrasting responses to drought of forest floor CO 2 efflux in a Loblolly pine plantation and a nearby Oak-Hickory forest

    S. Palmroth;S. Palmroth;Chris A. Maier;Heather R. McCarthy;A. C. Oishi

  • Canopy and physiological controls of GPP during drought and heat wave

    Yao Zhang;Xiangming Xiao;Xiangming Xiao;Sha Zhou;Sha Zhou;Philippe Ciais

  • Temporal dynamics and spatial variability in the enhancement of canopy leaf area under elevated atmospheric CO

    Heather R McCarthy;Ram Oren;Adrien C Finzi;David S Ellsworth

  • Understanding preferences for tree attributes: the relative effects of socio-economic and local environmental factors

    Meghan L. Avolio;Diane E. Pataki;Stephanie Pincetl;Thomas W. Gillespie

  • Comprehensive ecosystem model-data synthesis using multiple data sets at two temperate forest free-air CO2 enrichment experiments: Model performance at ambient CO2 concentration

    Anthony P. Walker;Anthony P. Walker;Paul J. Hanson;Martin G. De Kauwe;Belinda E. Medlyn

  • Interaction of ice storms and management practices on current carbon sequestration in forests with potential mitigation under future CO2 atmosphere

    Heather R. McCarthy;Ram Oren;Hyun-Seok Kim;Kurt H. Johnsen

Frequent Co-Authors

Ram Oren
Ram Oren Duke University
Sari Palmroth
Sari Palmroth Duke University
Diane E. Pataki
Diane E. Pataki Arizona State University
Gabriel G. Katul
Gabriel G. Katul Duke University
Paul C. Stoy
Paul C. Stoy University of Wisconsin–Madison
Adrien C. Finzi
Adrien C. Finzi Boston University
Mario B. S. Siqueira
Mario B. S. Siqueira Duke University
Yiqi Luo
Yiqi Luo Cornell University
Jean-Christophe Domec
Jean-Christophe Domec Bordeaux Sciences Agro
Kurt H. Johnsen
Kurt H. Johnsen US Forest Service

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying Ecology and Evolution in the USA, you’ll find a variety of related online degrees that can broaden your career options. Fields such as environmental psychology, mental health counseling, and social work intersect with ecology by focusing on human-environment interactions and community wellbeing.

For those who want to make a difference in communities or advocate for environmental policies, best online msw programs prepare graduates for impactful careers in social services or policy advocacy. If you’re interested in the mental health aspects of environmental change or human behavior, consider exploring accelerated psychology masters programs or pursuing an accelerated online masters in counseling degree.

Ecology majors may also be drawn to forensic work. Specialized graduate study can open doors—discover what can you do with a masters in forensic psychology and how it connects to ecosystem protection and law enforcement.

These online degrees offer flexibility and allow students to gain skills for evolving job markets, including research, education, policy, mental health, and advocacy roles.

Best Scientists Citing Heather R. McCarthy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles