World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mario B. S. Siqueira

Mario B. S. Siqueira

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 33 9540 9133 3418 3167 78 4938

Mario B. S. Siqueira publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mario B. S. Siqueira between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mario B. S. Siqueira published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 2.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2006. 11 of the 91 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2006. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 4 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 2 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 5 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 9 publications
1994 2025

91 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mario B. S. Siqueira: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 1
2002 4
2003 6
2004 7
2005 6
2006 12
2007 7
2008 5
2009 5
2010 5
2011 1
2012 2
2013 2
2014 2
2015 3
2016 1
2017 5
2018 0
2019 2
2020 0
2021 1
2022 0
2023 0
2024 2
2025 9
Total 91
Download as CSV

Mario B. S. Siqueira publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mario B. S. Siqueira sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 71–80 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 78 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257 78
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Mario B. S. Siqueira D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mario B. S. Siqueira sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88 33
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Mario B. S. Siqueira is affiliated with Duke University in the United States and has contributed to research primarily in the fields of Environmental Science and Engineering. Their work spans multiple subfields including Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Pollution, Global and Planetary Change, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment, as well as Mechanical Engineering.

The scientist's research topics cover a broad spectrum related to energy and environmental impacts, energy load and power forecasting, traffic prediction and management techniques, hydrological forecasting using artificial intelligence, thermochemical biomass conversion processes, municipal solid waste management, and atmospheric chemistry and aerosols.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Energy Conversion and Management
  • ACS Omega
  • Oecologia
  • Applied Energy
  • Journal of Cleaner Production

The following are some recent papers authored or co-authored by Mario B. S. Siqueira:

  • "Wind speed short-term prediction using recurrent neural network GRU model and stationary wavelet transform GRU hybrid model," 2024, Energy Conversion and Management
  • "Vapor pressure deficit helps explain biogenic volatile organic compound fluxes from the forest floor and canopy of a temperate deciduous forest," 2021, Oecologia
  • "Hybrid concentrating solar-landfill gas power-generation concept for landfill energy recovery," 2021, Applied Energy
  • "Simulation and Thermodynamic Evaluation of Woody Biomass Waste Torrefaction," 2025, ACS Omega
  • "Exergy loss and optimization in Brazilian urban wastewater treatment: A study of the urban water-exergy-environment nexus," 2025, Journal of Cleaner Production

Collaborators who have frequently co-authored with Mario B. S. Siqueira include:

  • Darío Gerardo Fantini
  • Reginaldo Nunes da Silva
  • Giulia Cruz Lamas
  • Edgar A. Silveira
  • Mauro Sérgio Silva Pinto

Best Publications

  • Evaluation of remote sensing based terrestrial productivity from MODIS using regional tower eddy flux network observations

    F.A. Heinsch;Maosheng Zhao;S.W. Running;J.S. Kimball

  • Mechanistic analytical models for long-distance seed dispersal by wind.

    G. G. Katul;A. Porporato;R. Nathan;M. Siqueira

  • Carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange in a warm temperate grassland

    Kimberly A. Novick;Paul C. Stoy;Gabriel G. Katul;D. S. Ellsworth

  • Separating the effects of climate and vegetation on evapotranspiration along a successional chronosequence in the southeastern US

    Paul C. Stoy;Gabriel G. Katul;Mario B. S. Siqueira;Jehn-Yih Juang

  • An evaluation of models for partitioning eddy covariance-measured net ecosystem exchange into photosynthesis and respiration

    Paul C. Stoy;Gabriel G. Katul;Mario B.S. Siqueira;Mario B.S. Siqueira;Jehn-Yih Juang

  • Separating the effects of albedo from eco-physiological changes on surface temperature along a successional chronosequence in the southeastern United States

    Jehn-Yih Juang;Jehn-Yih Juang;Gabriel G. Katul;Mario B. S. Siqueira;Mario B. S. Siqueira;Paul C. Stoy;Paul C. Stoy

  • Climate control of terrestrial carbon exchange across biomes and continents

    Chuixiang Yi;Daniel Ricciuto;Runze Li;John Wolbeck

  • Variability in net ecosystem exchange from hourly to inter-annual time scales at adjacent pine and hardwood forests: a wavelet analysis.

    Paul C. Stoy;Gabriel G. Katul;Mario B. S. Siqueira;Jehn-Yih Juang

  • Nocturnal evapotranspiration in eddy-covariance records from three co-located ecosystems in the Southeastern U.S.: Implications for annual fluxes

    Kimberly A. Novick;Ram Oren;Paul C. Stoy;Paul C. Stoy;Mario B. S. Siqueira;Mario B. S. Siqueira

  • On the spectrum of soil moisture from hourly to interannual scales

    Gabriel G. Katul;Amilcare Michele M. Porporato;Edoardo Daly;A. Christopher Oishi

  • Onset of water stress, hysteresis in plant conductance, and hydraulic lift: Scaling soil water dynamics from millimeters to meters

    Mario Siqueira;Mario Siqueira;Gabriel Katul;Amilcare Porporato

  • Organised Motion and Radiative Perturbations in the Nocturnal Canopy Sublayer above an Even-Aged Pine Forest

    D. Cava;U. Giostra;M. Siqueira;G. Katul

  • Role of vegetation in determining carbon sequestration along ecological succession in the southeastern United States

    Paul C. Stoy;Paul C. Stoy;Gabriel G. Katul;Mario B. S. Siqueira;Mario B. S. Siqueira;Jehn-Yih Juang;Jehn-Yih Juang

  • Soil Moisture Feedbacks on Convection Triggers: The Role of Soil-Plant Hydrodynamics

    Mario Siqueira;Gabriel Katul;Amilcare Michele M. Porporato

  • Modelling the limits on the response of net carbon exchange to fertilization in a south-eastern pine forest

    C.-T. Lai;G. Katul;J. Butnor;M. Siqueira

  • Are ecosystem carbon inputs and outputs coupled at short time scales? A case study from adjacent pine and hardwood forests using impulse-response analysis.

    Paul C. Stoy;Paul C. Stoy;Sari Palmroth;A. Christopher Oishi;Mario B. S. Siqueira;Mario B. S. Siqueira

  • Multiscale model intercomparisons of CO2 and H2O exchange rates in a maturing southeastern US pine forest

    Mario B. S. Siqueira;Gabriel G. Katul;D. A. Sampson;Paul C. Stoy

  • The relationship between reference canopy conductance and simplified hydraulic architecture

    Kimberly A. Novick;Ram Oren;Paul C. Stoy;Jehn-Yih Juang

  • On the difference in the net ecosystem exchange of CO2 between deciduous and evergreen forests in the southeastern United States

    Kimberly A. Novick;Kimberly A. Novick;A. Christopher Oishi;A. Christopher Oishi;Eric J. Ward;Eric J. Ward;Mario B. S. Siqueira;Mario B. S. Siqueira

  • The structure of turbulence near a tall forest edge: the backward-facing step flow analogy revisited.

    Matteo Detto;Gabriel G. Katul;Mario B. S. Siqueira;Mario B. S. Siqueira;Jehn-Yih Juang

Frequent Co-Authors

Gabriel G. Katul
Gabriel G. Katul Duke University
Paul C. Stoy
Paul C. Stoy University of Wisconsin–Madison
Ram Oren
Ram Oren Duke University
Kimberly A. Novick
Kimberly A. Novick Indiana University
Amilcare Porporato
Amilcare Porporato Princeton University
Heather R. McCarthy
Heather R. McCarthy University of Oklahoma
David S. Ellsworth
David S. Ellsworth Western Sydney University
Thomas Foken
Thomas Foken University of Bayreuth
Sari Palmroth
Sari Palmroth Duke University
Henry W. Loescher
Henry W. Loescher National Ecological Observatory Network

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Environmental Sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse interdisciplinary career opportunities. Many students complement their environmental studies with specialized fields to enhance their expertise and job prospects.

For example, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) plays a crucial role in environmental monitoring and analysis. Exploring the top gis masters programs can equip professionals with advanced spatial data skills needed for sustainable development and resource management.

Leadership and policy development are also vital in environmental sectors. Online degrees like the online mpa degrees offer flexible paths to mastering public administration, preparing graduates to influence environmental policy effectively.

Understanding social behavior and community dynamics is key when addressing environmental challenges. An online sociology degree bachelors provides insights into societal impacts, helping professionals design inclusive environmental solutions.

For those interested in advanced research without lengthy dissertation commitments, certain 1 year phd programs online no dissertation offer accelerated, flexible doctoral options aligned with environmental career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Mario B. S. Siqueira

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles