World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kimberly A. Novick

Kimberly A. Novick

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
53
Citations
14645
World Ranking
4164
National Ranking
1576

Kimberly A. Novick publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kimberly A. Novick sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 171 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Kimberly A. Novick D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kimberly A. Novick sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Kimberly A. Novick is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States and specializes in Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their work primarily focuses on global and planetary change, atmospheric science, nature and landscape conservation, plant science, and environmental engineering. The main themes of their research include plant water relations and carbon dynamics, tree-ring climate responses, climate variability and models, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, hydrology and drought analysis, ecology and vegetation dynamics studies, and hydrology and watershed management studies.

Novick has contributed to several peer-reviewed journals, with frequent publications appearing in the Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences, Global Change Biology, New Phytologist, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, and Earth's Future. Their recent papers cover various aspects of plant-environment interactions and ecosystem responses to climate factors, such as vapor pressure deficit and water potential.

  • "Plant responses to rising vapor pressure deficit," 2020, New Phytologist
  • "Detecting forest response to droughts with global observations of vegetation water content," 2021, Global Change Biology
  • "Confronting the water potential information gap," 2022, Nature Geoscience
  • "The impacts of rising vapour pressure deficit in natural and managed ecosystems," 2024, Plant Cell & Environment
  • "Integrating continuous atmospheric boundary layer and tower-based flux measurements to advance understanding of land-atmosphere interactions," 2021, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Collaboration is a significant aspect of Novick's scientific career. Frequent coauthors include Richard P. Phillips, William R. L. Anderegg, Mallory L. Barnes, Michael Benson, and Lixin Wang. These recurrent partnerships reflect a consistent research network within their field of study.

Best Publications

  • Plant responses to rising vapor pressure deficit.

    Charlotte Grossiord;Charlotte Grossiord;Thomas N. Buckley;Lucas A. Cernusak;Kimberly A. Novick

  • The FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance data

    Gilberto Pastorello;Carlo Trotta;Eleonora Canfora;Housen Chu

  • The increasing importance of atmospheric demand for ecosystem water and carbon fluxes

    Kimberly A. Novick;Darren L. Ficklin;Paul C. Stoy;Christopher A. Williams

  • Land management and land-cover change have impacts of similar magnitude on surface temperature

    Sebastiaan Luyssaert;Mathilde Jammet;Paul C. Stoy;Stephen Estel

  • Representativeness of Eddy-Covariance flux footprints for areas surrounding AmeriFlux sites

    Housen Chu;Xiangzhong Luo;Xiangzhong Luo;Zutao Ouyang;W. Stephen Chan

  • Historic and projected changes in vapor pressure deficit suggest a continental‐scale drying of the United States atmosphere

    Darren L. Ficklin;Kimberly A. Novick

  • The AmeriFlux network: A coalition of the willing

    K.A. Novick;J.A. Biederman;A.R. Desai;M.E. Litvak

  • High atmospheric demand for water can limit forest carbon uptake and transpiration as severely as dry soil

    Benjamin N. Sulman;Benjamin N. Sulman;D. Tyler Roman;D. Tyler Roman;Koong Yi;Lixin Wang

  • Carbon dioxide and water vapor exchange in a warm temperate grassland

    Kimberly A. Novick;Paul C. Stoy;Gabriel G. Katul;D. S. Ellsworth

  • Disentangling the role of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance on rising forest water-use efficiency.

    Rossella Guerrieri;Rossella Guerrieri;Soumaya Belmecheri;Scott V. Ollinger;Heidi Asbjornsen

  • The role of isohydric and anisohydric species in determining ecosystem-scale response to severe drought.

    D. T. Roman;K. A. Novick;E. R. Brzostek;D. Dragoni

  • Separating the effects of climate and vegetation on evapotranspiration along a successional chronosequence in the southeastern US

    Paul C. Stoy;Gabriel G. Katul;Mario B. S. Siqueira;Jehn-Yih Juang

  • An evaluation of models for partitioning eddy covariance-measured net ecosystem exchange into photosynthesis and respiration

    Paul C. Stoy;Gabriel G. Katul;Mario B.S. Siqueira;Mario B.S. Siqueira;Jehn-Yih Juang

  • Linking drought legacy effects across scales: From leaves to tree rings to ecosystems

    Steven A. Kannenberg;Kimberly A. Novick;M. Ross Alexander;Justin T. Maxwell;Justin T. Maxwell

  • Separating the effects of albedo from eco-physiological changes on surface temperature along a successional chronosequence in the southeastern United States

    Jehn-Yih Juang;Jehn-Yih Juang;Gabriel G. Katul;Mario B. S. Siqueira;Mario B. S. Siqueira;Paul C. Stoy;Paul C. Stoy

  • Interannual Invariability of Forest Evapotranspiration and Its Consequence to Water Flow Downstream

    A. Christopher Oishi;Ram Oren;Kimberly A. Novick;Sari Palmroth

  • A new multi-sensor integrated index for drought monitoring

    Wenzhe Jiao;Chao Tian;Qing Chang;Kimberly A. Novick

  • Detecting forest response to droughts with global observations of vegetation water content.

    Alexandra G. Konings;Sassan S. Saatchi;Christian Frankenberg;Michael Keller;Michael Keller

  • Confronting the water potential information gap

    Unknown

  • Response of ecosystem intrinsic water use efficiency and gross primary productivity to rising vapor pressure deficit

    Quan Zhang;Quan Zhang;Darren L Ficklin;Stefano Manzoni;Lixin Wang

  • Nocturnal evapotranspiration in eddy-covariance records from three co-located ecosystems in the Southeastern U.S.: Implications for annual fluxes

    Kimberly A. Novick;Ram Oren;Paul C. Stoy;Paul C. Stoy;Mario B. S. Siqueira;Mario B. S. Siqueira

  • The role of surface roughness, albedo, and Bowen ratio on ecosystem energy balance in the Eastern United States

    Elizabeth A. Burakowski;Elizabeth A. Burakowski;Ahmed Tawfik;Andrew P. Ouimette;Lucie C. Lepine;Lucie C. Lepine

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul C. Stoy
Paul C. Stoy University of Wisconsin–Madison
Richard P. Phillips
Richard P. Phillips Indiana University
Gabriel G. Katul
Gabriel G. Katul Duke University
Mario B. S. Siqueira
Mario B. S. Siqueira Duke University
Ram Oren
Ram Oren Duke University
Russell L. Scott
Russell L. Scott Agricultural Research Service
Lixin Wang
Lixin Wang Indiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis
Ankur R. Desai
Ankur R. Desai University of Wisconsin–Madison
Gil Bohrer
Gil Bohrer The Ohio State University
Peter D. Blanken
Peter D. Blanken University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences often leads students to consider complementary fields and advanced studies that broaden career prospects. For example, a bachelors degree in sociology online can provide valuable insights into human-environment interactions and social factors influencing sustainability. This interdisciplinary understanding is increasingly important for roles in policy and community engagement.

For educators aiming to specialize in environmental education or leadership, pursuing online edd programs no dissertation or enrolling in the best online eds to edd programs can be strategic steps. These paths offer flexibility and advanced training without the lengthy dissertation process, allowing professionals to strengthen their impact in academic or organizational settings.

Additionally, for those interested in social work and environmental justice, the dsw program offers an opportunity to develop advanced practical skills. It supports careers focused on community well-being and environmental advocacy, critical for shaping equitable sustainability initiatives.

Best Scientists Citing Kimberly A. Novick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles