World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
W. Michael Dunne

W. Michael Dunne

W. Michael Dunne publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by W. Michael Dunne between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. W. Michael Dunne published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 2.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 11 publications in 2011. 1 of the 114 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 11. Peak 11 publications in 2011. 1985: 2 publications 1986: 4 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 5 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 4 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 8 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 2 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1985 2025

114 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
W. Michael Dunne: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 2
1986 4
1987 3
1988 0
1989 1
1990 2
1991 1
1992 5
1993 7
1994 1
1995 2
1996 0
1997 2
1998 1
1999 1
2000 1
2001 4
2002 2
2003 3
2004 3
2005 3
2006 1
2007 8
2008 5
2009 2
2010 2
2011 11
2012 7
2013 7
2014 0
2015 4
2016 5
2017 8
2018 2
2019 2
2020 0
2021 0
2022 1
2023 0
2024 0
2025 1
Total 114
Download as CSV

W. Michael Dunne publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where W. Michael Dunne sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

W. Michael Dunne D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where W. Michael Dunne sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

W. Michael Dunne is affiliated with bioMérieux in France and has contributed to multiple research areas including biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and neuroscience. Their work spans key fields such as molecular biology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, infectious diseases, and clinical biochemistry.

Their research topics cover a range of subjects including gut microbiota and health, Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research, metabolomics and mass spectrometry studies, bacterial identification and susceptibility testing, neurotransmitter receptor influence on behavior, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, and receptor mechanisms and signaling.

Recent publications by Dunne demonstrate a breadth of investigation across these disciplines, including:

  • Murine Model for Measuring Effects of Humanized-Dosing of Antibiotics on the Gut Microbiome, 2022, Frontiers in Microbiology
  • A Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases: 2013 Recommendations by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society for Microbiology (ASM), 2020, UNC Libraries
  • Cocaine chemogenetics blunts drug-seeking by synthetic physiology, 2025, Nature

The scientist has collaborated with a number of frequent co-authors including Shana R. Leopold, Kamilia Abdelraouf, David P. Nicolau, Hanako Agresta, and Jethro S. Johnson, reflecting a network of interdisciplinary research partnerships.

The main publication venues for the scientist's work include Frontiers in Microbiology, UNC Libraries, and Nature. These venues correspond to their diverse interests in microbiology, infectious diseases, and neuroscience research.

Best Publications

  • Structure, function and diversity of the healthy human microbiome

    Curtis Huttenhower;Curtis Huttenhower;Dirk Gevers;Rob Knight;Rob Knight;Sahar Abubucker

  • A framework for human microbiome research

    Barbara A. Methé;Karen E. Nelson;Mihai Pop;Heather H. Creasy

  • Bacterial Adhesion: Seen Any Good Biofilms Lately?

    W. Michael Dunne

  • A Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases: 2013 Recommendations by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society for Microbiology (ASM)a

    Ellen Jo Baron;J. Michael Miller;Melvin P. Weinstein;Sandra S. Richter

  • Commensal Bacteroides Species Induce Colitis in Host-Genotype-Specific Fashion in a Mouse Model of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

    Seth M. Bloom;Vinieth N. Bijanki;Gerardo M. Nava;Lulu Sun

  • Diffusion of rifampin and vancomycin through a Staphylococcus epidermidis biofilm.

    W. M. Dunne;Edward Mason;Sheldon Kaplan

  • Detection of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Directly from Nasal Swab Specimens by a Real-Time PCR Assay

    David K. Warren;Robert S. Liao;Liana R. Merz;Michael Eveland

  • Developmental roadmap for antimicrobial susceptibility testing systems

    Alex van Belkum;Till T. Bachmann;Gerd Lüdke;Jan Gorm Lisby

  • Next-Generation Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

    Alex van Belkum;W. Michael Dunne

  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa Acquires Biofilm-Like Properties within Airway Epithelial Cells

    Raquel Garcia-Medina;W. Michael Dunne;Pradeep K. Singh;Steven L. Brody

  • Interleukin-7 ameliorates immune dysfunction and improves survival in a 2-hit model of fungal sepsis.

    Jacqueline Unsinger;Carey-Ann D. Burnham;Jacquelyn McDonough;Michel Morre

  • Neutrophil-mediated oxidative burst and host defense are controlled by a Vav-PLCγ2 signaling axis in mice

    Daniel B. Graham;Charles M. Robertson;Jhoanne Bautista;Francesca Mascarenhas

  • Timing of Specimen Collection for Blood Cultures from Febrile Patients with Bacteremia

    Stefan Riedel;Paul Bourbeau;Brandi Swartz;Steven Brecher

  • Sepsis from Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia decreases intestinal proliferation and induces gut epithelial cell cycle arrest.

    Craig M. Coopersmith;Paul E. Stromberg;Christopher G. Davis;W. Michael Dunne

  • Role of apoptosis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia.

    Richard S. Hotchkiss;W. Michael Dunne;Paul E. Swanson;Christopher G. Davis

  • Hot tub folliculitis or hot hand–foot syndrome caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa

    Yue Yu;Amy S. Cheng;Lawrence Wang;W. Michael Dunne

  • Panton-Valentine Leukocidin-Positive Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Lung Infection in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis

    Arnon Elizur;Rachel C. Orscheln;Thomas W. Ferkol;Jeffrey J. Atkinson

  • Tigecycline for treatment of pneumonia and empyema caused by carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.

    Michael W. Daly;Michael W. Daly;David J. Riddle;Nathan A. Ledeboer;W. Michael Dunne

  • Executive Summary: A Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases: 2013 Recommendations by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society for Microbiology (ASM)a

    Ellen Jo Baron;Ellen Jo Baron;J. Michael Miller;Melvin P. Weinstein;Sandra S. Richter

  • Comparison of the Automated Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube System (BACTEC 960/MGIT) with Löwenstein-Jensen medium for recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens.

    Dongsi Lu;Dongsi Lu;Bobbi Heeren;W. Michael Dunne

Frequent Co-Authors

Alex van Belkum
Alex van Belkum BaseClear B.V.
Gregory A. Storch
Gregory A. Storch Washington University in St. Louis
George M. Weinstock
George M. Weinstock The Jackson Laboratory
Elaine R. Mardis
Elaine R. Mardis The Ohio State University
Sandra S. Richter
Sandra S. Richter Cleveland Clinic
Karen C. Carroll
Karen C. Carroll Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
Patrick S. G. Chain
Patrick S. G. Chain Los Alamos National Laboratory
Robin Patel
Robin Patel Mayo Clinic
Donna M. Muzny
Donna M. Muzny Baylor College of Medicine
Richard A. Gibbs
Richard A. Gibbs Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring microbiology often leads students to consider complementary online degrees that expand their career opportunities in healthcare, research, and public service. For instance, those interested in healthcare roles might look into medical degrees online that pay well, which can provide a pathway to higher salaries and specialized professions.

Public health is another promising field for microbiology graduates. Many find it advantageous to pursue an MPH degree, with several easy mph online programs available that offer flexibility and accessibility. These programs often require less stringent entry criteria and can accommodate working professionals.

Additionally, careers like becoming a child life specialist may appeal to those who want to work closely with pediatric patients. It’s possible to enter this field with a bachelor’s degree, and understanding the child life specialist salary with bachelor degree is important for planning your financial future.

Finally, education pathways in biology and healthcare can also be accessible to individuals with past criminal records. There are a variety of degrees for felons that provide a second chance to build a rewarding career.

Best Scientists Citing W. Michael Dunne

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles