World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Pedro F. Quintana-Ascencio

Pedro F. Quintana-Ascencio

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
33
Citations
4932
World Ranking
7818
National Ranking
2614

Pedro F. Quintana-Ascencio publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pedro F. Quintana-Ascencio sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 123 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Pedro F. Quintana-Ascencio D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Pedro F. Quintana-Ascencio sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Pedro F. Quintana-Ascencio is affiliated with the University of Central Florida in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with notable work in subfields such as Nature and Landscape Conservation, Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, and Ecological Modeling.

Their main topics of study include:

  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
  • Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Plant Parasitism and Resistance

Pedro F. Quintana-Ascencio has coauthored frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Eric S. Menges
  • Ian Biazzo
  • David G. Jenkins
  • Elizabeth H. Boughton
  • Diego Vélez-Mora

They have published multiple papers in notable venues, including Scientific Reports, Ecosphere, Conservation Science and Practice, BioScience, and the Forest Service Research Data Archive.

Recent publications by Pedro F. Quintana-Ascencio include:

  • "A solution to minimum sample size for regressions," 2020, PLoS ONE
  • "Grassland intensification effects cascade to alter multifunctionality of wetlands within metaecosystems," 2023, Nature Communications
  • "Pasture management, grazing, and fire interact to determine wetland provisioning in a subtropical agroecosystem," 2020, Ecosphere
  • "Demographic effects of interacting species: exploring stable coexistence under increased climatic variability in a semiarid shrub community," 2021, Scientific Reports
  • "Incorporating distance metrics and temporal trends to refine mixed stock analysis," 2022, Scientific Reports

Best Publications

  • Diversity of ageing across the tree of life

    Owen Jones;Alexander Scheuerlein;Roberto Salguero-Gómez;Carlo Giovanni Camarda

  • How do plant ecologists use matrix population models

    Elizabeth E. Crone;Eric S. Menges;Martha M. Ellis;Timothy Bell

  • Secondary succession in disturbed Pinus-Quercus forests in the highlands of Chiapas, Mexico

    Mario González‐Espinosa;Pedro F. Quintana‐Ascencio;Neptalí Ramírez‐Marcial;Patricia Gaytán‐Guzmán

  • Soil seed banks and regeneration of tropical rain forest from milpa fields at the Selva Lacandona, Chiapas, Mexico

    Pedro Francisco Quintana-Ascencio;Mario Gonzalez-Espinosa;Neptali Ramirez-Marcial;Gabriela Dominguez-Vazquez

  • Inferring Metapopulation Dynamics from Patch-Level Incidence of Florida Scrub Plants

    Pedro F. Quintana-Ascencio;Pedro F. Quintana-Ascencio;Eric S. Menges

  • Tree composition and structure in disturbed stands with varying dominance by Pinus spp. in the highlands of Chiapas, Mexico

    Luis Galindo-Jaimes;Mario González-Espinosa;Pedro Quintana-Ascencio;Luis García-Barrios

  • Ability of matrix models to explain the past and predict the future of plant populations.

    Elizabeth E. Crone;Martha M. Ellis;William F. Morris;Amanda Stanley

  • POPULATION VIABILITY WITH FIRE IN ERYNGIUM CUNEIFOLIUM: DECIPHERING A DECADE OF DEMOGRAPHIC DATA

    Eric S. Menges;Pedro F. Quintana-Ascencio

  • A fire-explicit population viability analysis of Hypericum cumulicola in Florida rosemary scrub

    Pedro Francisco Quintana-Ascencio;Eric S. Menges;Carl W. Weekley

  • Using population viability analysis to predict the effects of climate change on the extinction risk of an endangered limestone endemic shrub, Arizona cliffrose.

    Joyce Maschinski;Joanne E. Baggs;Pedro F. Quintana-Ascencio;Eric S. Menges

  • Acorn Removal, Seedling Survivorship, and Seedlings Growth of Quercus crispipilis in Successional Forests of the Highlands of Chiapas, Mexico

    Pedro F. Quintana-Ascencio;Mario Gonzalez-Espinosa;Neptali Ramirez-Marcial

  • Fire-mediated effects of shrubs, lichens and herbs on the demography of Hypericum cumulicola in patchy Florida scrub.

    Pedro F. Quintana-Ascencio;Marina Morales-Hernández

  • Seed predation and dispersal in a dominant desert plant: Opuntia, ants, birds, and mammals

    Mario González-Espinosa;Pedro F. Quintana-Ascencio

  • POPULATION VIABILITY ANALYSES OF CHAMAECRISTA KEYENSIS: EFFECTS OF FIRE SEASON AND FREQUENCY

    Hong Liu;Eric S. Menges;Pedro F. Quintana-Ascencio

  • Competitive abilities of three narrowly endemic plant species in experimental neighborhoods along a fire gradient.

    Pedro F. Quintana-Ascencio;Eric S. Menges

  • Hypericum cumulicola demography in unoccupied and occupied Florida scrub patches with different time-since-fire

    Pedro F. Quintana-Ascencio;Pedro F. Quintana-Ascencio;Rebecca W. Dolan;Eric S. Menges

  • Land-use and isolation interact to affect wetland plant assemblages

    Elizabeth H. Boughton;Pedro F. Quintana-Ascencio;Patrick J. Bohlen;David G. Jenkins

  • Isolated Wetland Loss and Degradation Over Two Decades in an Increasingly Urbanized Landscape

    Lisa A. McCauley;Lisa A. McCauley;David G. Jenkins;Pedro F. Quintana-Ascencio

  • Association of ecotones with relative elevation and fire in an upland Florida landscape

    E.A. Boughton;E.A. Boughton;P.F. Quintana-Ascencio;P.F. Quintana-Ascencio;E.S. Menges;R.K. Boughton

  • Comparative demography of a rare species in Florida scrub and road habitats

    Pedro F. Quintana-Ascencio;Pedro F. Quintana-Ascencio;Carl W. Weekley;Eric S. Menges

Frequent Co-Authors

Eric S. Menges
Eric S. Menges Archbold Biological Station
Roberto Salguero-Gómez
Roberto Salguero-Gómez University of Oxford
David G. Jenkins
David G. Jenkins University of Central Florida
Patrick J. Bohlen
Patrick J. Bohlen University of Central Florida
Johan Ehrlén
Johan Ehrlén Stockholm University
Adrián Escudero
Adrián Escudero King Juan Carlos University
José Miguel Olano
José Miguel Olano University of Valladolid
Tamara Ticktin
Tamara Ticktin University of Hawaii at Manoa
Elizabeth E. Crone
Elizabeth E. Crone Tufts University
Tiffany M. Knight
Tiffany M. Knight Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Ecology and Evolution opens doors to diverse roles, from research and conservation to education and policy work. Many students interested in these fields also consider how flexible online degree pathways can support their goals, especially if they wish to combine ecological studies with health or science careers.

For those with a background in nursing or related sciences, programs such as rn to np bridge programs or online bsn to msn programs can fast-track your advancement and open interdisciplinary career options, including work in environmental health. If you’re new to nursing but interested in a science-related healthcare career, consider the msn direct entry programs online designed for non-nurses.

Choosing the right university is crucial. Comparing institutions, like in the capella university vs wgu rn to bsn guide, helps students find programs that best meet their needs. Whether you’re aiming to blend ecology with healthcare or seeking flexible study options, exploring these online pathways can expand your professional landscape in the US and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Pedro F. Quintana-Ascencio

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles