World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
112
Citations
53947
World Ranking
44
National Ranking
1

James W. Vaupel publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James W. Vaupel sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 302 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 510 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

James W. Vaupel D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James W. Vaupel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 261 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 112 D-Index — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina - Deutsche Akademie der Naturforscher Leopoldina – Nationale Akademie der Wissenschaften Economics and Empirical Social Sciences
  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2004 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences

Overview

James W. Vaupel was affiliated with the University of Southern Denmark. Their research primarily focused on social sciences and health professions, with a significant concentration in demography and general health professions as subfields.

The scientist contributed extensively to literature on topics including insurance, mortality, demography, and risk management. Other prominent areas of work involved global health care issues, health disparities and outcomes, climate change and health impacts, COVID-19 epidemiological studies, genetics, aging and longevity in model organisms, as well as birth, development, and health.

Frequent publication venues for their work included:

  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Nature Communications
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Demographic Research
  • Scandinavian Journal of Public Health

Coauthors who collaborated on multiple works with James W. Vaupel included Francisco Villavicencio, José Manuel Aburto, Marie-Pier Bergeron-Boucher, Silvia Rizzi, and Kaare Christensen.

Selected recent papers demonstrated the range and scope of their research:

  • "Dynamics of life expectancy and life span equality," 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Demographic perspectives on the rise of longevity," 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "National age and coresidence patterns shape COVID-19 vulnerability," 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Death rates at specific life stages mold the sex gap in life expectancy," 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "The long lives of primates and the 'invariant rate of ageing' hypothesis," 2021, Nature Communications

Their scholarly output also included book publications with notable publishers such as Springer Nature and Princeton University Press. Titles included "Exceptional Lifespans" published in 2020 and "Biodemography" published in 2020.

Throughout their career, James W. Vaupel received several recognitions, including fellowships and academy memberships:

  • Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2008
  • Member of the National Academy of Sciences, 2004
  • Member of the German National Academy of Sciences Leopoldina, 2008, recognized in economics and empirical social sciences

Best Publications

  • Ageing populations: the challenges ahead

    Kaare Christensen;Gabriele Doblhammer;Roland Rau;James W Vaupel

  • Broken Limits to Life Expectancy

    Jim Oeppen;James W. Vaupel

  • The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality.

    James W. Vaupel;Kenneth G. Manton;Eric Stallard

  • Biodemography of human ageing.

    James W. Vaupel

  • Biodemographic Trajectories of Longevity

    James W. Vaupel;James R. Carey;Kaare Christensen;Thomas E. Johnson

  • Heterogeneity's ruses: some surprising effects of selection on population dynamics.

    James W. Vaupel;Anatoli I. Yashin

  • Diversity of ageing across the tree of life

    Owen Jones;Alexander Scheuerlein;Roberto Salguero-Gómez;Carlo Giovanni Camarda

  • The heritability of human longevity: A population-based study of 2872 Danish twin pairs born 1870–1900

    Anne Maria Herskind;Matthew McGue;Niels V. Holm;Thorkild I. A. Sørensen

  • Survival, disabilities in activities of daily living, and physical and cognitive functioning among the oldest-old in China: a cohort study.

    Yi Zeng;Yi Zeng;Qiushi Feng;Therese Hesketh;Therese Hesketh;Kaare Christensen

  • Men: good health and high mortality. Sex differences in health and aging*

    Anna Oksuzyan;Anna Oksuzyan;Knud Juel;James W. Vaupel;Kaare Christensen

  • Slowing of mortality rates at older ages in large medfly cohorts.

    James R. Carey;Pablo Liedo;Dina Orozco;James W. Vaupel

  • The quest for genetic determinants of human longevity: challenges and insights

    Kaare Christensen;Thomas E. Johnson;James W. Vaupel

  • Genetic influence on human lifespan and longevity

    Jacob v. B. Hjelmborg;Ivan Iachine;Axel Skytthe;James W. Vaupel

  • Lifespan depends on month of birth

    Gabriele Doblhammer;James W. Vaupel

  • Demography of genotypes: failure of the limited life-span paradigm in Drosophila melanogaster.

    James W. Curtsinger;Hidenori H. Fukui;David R. Townsend;James W. Vaupel

  • The force of mortality at ages 80 to 120

    A. R. Thatcher;Väinö Kannisto;James W. Vaupel

  • Reductions in mortality at advanced ages: several decades of evidence from 27 countries.

    Kannisto;Lauritsen J;Thatcher Ar;Vaupel Jw

  • Longevity is moderately heritable in a sample of Danish twins born 1870-1880.

    Matt McGue;James W. Vaupel;Niels Holm;Bent Harvald

  • Regulation and Its Reform, <i>by Stephen Breyer</i>

    Unknown

  • Physical and cognitive functioning of people older than 90 years: a comparison of two Danish cohorts born 10 years apart

    Kaare Christensen;Mikael Thinggaard;Anna Oksuzyan;Troels Steenstrup

  • The case for negative senescence

    James W. Vaupel;Annette Baudisch;Martin Dölling;Deborah A. Roach

Frequent Co-Authors

Matt McGue
Matt McGue University of Minnesota
Yi Zeng
Yi Zeng Peking University
Lene Christiansen
Lene Christiansen University of Southern Denmark
Vladimir M. Shkolnikov
Vladimir M. Shkolnikov Max Planck Society
Lars Bolund
Lars Bolund Aarhus University
Maxine Weinstein
Maxine Weinstein Georgetown University
Joris Deelen
Joris Deelen Max Planck Society
Thomas B. L. Kirkwood
Thomas B. L. Kirkwood Newcastle University
huanming yang
huanming yang Beijing Genomics Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in Social Sciences or Humanities opens doors to a wide range of rewarding careers, especially when paired with the flexibility of online education. Many students are now choosing cacrep schools to pursue accredited counseling programs, which can lead to professional counseling roles in a variety of settings.

Another popular option is the online marriage and family therapy masters programs, which are ideal for those passionate about supporting families and couples through challenging times. Psychology continues to be a top choice, with many affordable online degrees in psychology preparing graduates for roles in mental health services, human resources, or research.

For those interested in social advocacy, community outreach, or clinical work, there are also accessible online master's in social work options. All these pathways provide flexible learning and diverse career prospects, making the Social Sciences and Humanities an appealing and practical field for students worldwide.

Best Scientists Citing James W. Vaupel

Recently Published Articles