World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Thomas B. L. Kirkwood

Thomas B. L. Kirkwood

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
95
Citations
39701
World Ranking
1880
National Ranking
120

Thomas B. L. Kirkwood publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas B. L. Kirkwood sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 331 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Thomas B. L. Kirkwood D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas B. L. Kirkwood sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 95 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Thomas B. L. Kirkwood is affiliated with Newcastle University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans various fields within medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. They have focused extensively on aging and related biological processes, contributing to multiple subfields such as aging, physiology, geriatrics and gerontology, neuropsychology and physiological psychology, and pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

The main topics addressed in their work include genetics, aging, and longevity in model organisms; telomeres, telomerase, and senescence; frailty in older adults; aging and gerontology research; birth, development, and health; single-cell and spatial transcriptomics; and the effects of spaceflight on biology.

Several recent publications illustrate the scope and depth of their contributions. These include:

  • New hallmarks of ageing: a 2022 Copenhagen ageing meeting summary (2022, Aging)
  • On the evolution of cellular senescence (2020, Aging Cell)
  • A gerophysiology perspective on healthy ageing (2021, Ageing Research Reviews)
  • Senolytics and the compression of late-life mortality (2021, Experimental Gerontology)
  • Immunosenescence profiles are not associated with muscle strength, physical performance and sarcopenia risk in very old adults: The Newcastle 85+ Study (2020, Mechanisms of Ageing and Development)

The frequent venues for their publications include:

  • Mechanisms of Ageing and Development
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Aging
  • Aging Cell
  • Ageing Research Reviews

Their collaborative network comprises recurring co-authors such as Axel Kowald, Carmen Martín-Ruiz, Antoneta Granic, Richard Dodds, and Louise Robinson.

Thomas B. L. Kirkwood has received recognition as a Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom.

Best Publications

  • Evolution of ageing

    Thomas B.L Kirkwood

  • Why do we age

    Thomas B. L. Kirkwood;Steven N. Austad

  • Understanding the odd science of aging

    Thomas B.L. Kirkwood

  • Evolution of senescence: late survival sacrificed for reproduction.

    T. B. L. Kirkwood;M. R. Rose

  • The Evolution of Ageing and Longevity

    T. B. L. Kirkwood;Robin Holliday

  • Feedback between p21 and reactive oxygen production is necessary for cell senescence

    João F Passos;Glyn Nelson;Chunfang Wang;Torsten Richter

  • Mitochondrial dysfunction accounts for the stochastic heterogeneity in telomere-dependent senescence.

    João F Passos;Gabriele Saretzki;Gabriele Saretzki;Shaheda Ahmed;Shaheda Ahmed;Glyn Nelson

  • Mitochondrial DNA mutations in human colonic crypt stem cells

    Robert W. Taylor;Martin J. Barron;Gillian M. Borthwick;Amy Gospel

  • The mental wealth of nations

    John Beddington;Cary L. Cooper;John Field;Usha Goswami

  • Human longevity at the cost of reproductive success.

    Rudi G. J. Westendorp;Rudi G. J. Westendorp;Thomas B. L. Kirkwood

  • A systematic look at an old problem.

    Thomas B. L. Kirkwood

  • Frailty and the role of inflammation, immunosenescence and cellular ageing in the very old: Cross-sectional findings from the Newcastle 85+ Study

    Joanna Collerton;Carmen Martin-Ruiz;Karen Davies;Catharien M. Hilkens

  • Health and disease in 85 year olds: baseline findings from the Newcastle 85+ cohort study

    Joanna Collerton;Karen Davies;Carol Jagger;Andrew Kingston

  • Hormonal control of the yolk precursor vitellogenin regulates immune function and longevity in honeybees

    Gro V Amdam;Zilá L.P Simões;Arne Hagen;Kari Norberg

  • Positive correlation between mammalian life span and cellular resistance to stress

    Pankaj Kapahi;Michael E Boulton;Thomas B.L Kirkwood

  • Age-Related Meiotic Segregation Errors in Mammalian Oocytes Are Preceded by Depletion of Cohesin and Sgo2

    Lisa Martine Lister;Lisa Martine Lister;Anna Kouznetsova;Louise Ann Hyslop;Dimitrios Kalleas;Dimitrios Kalleas

  • Calorie restriction and aging: a life-history analysis.

    Daryl P. Shanley;Thomas B. L. Kirkwood

  • Cytogerontology since 1881: A reappraisal of August Weismann and a review of modern progress

    Thomas B. L. Kirkwood;Thomas Cremer

  • Age-related frailty and its association with biological markers of ageing.

    Arnold Mitnitski;Joanna Collerton;Carmen Martin-Ruiz;Carol Jagger

  • Genome-wide association meta-analysis of human longevity identifies a novel locus conferring survival beyond 90 years of age

    Joris Deelen;Marian Beekman;Hae-Won Uh;Linda Broer

Frequent Co-Authors

Carol Jagger
Carol Jagger Newcastle University
Vern L. Bengtson
Vern L. Bengtson University of Southern California
Thomas von Zglinicki
Thomas von Zglinicki Newcastle University
John C. Mathers
John C. Mathers Newcastle University
Rudi G. J. Westendorp
Rudi G. J. Westendorp University of Copenhagen
Darren J. Wilkinson
Darren J. Wilkinson Durham University
Avan Aihie Sayer
Avan Aihie Sayer Newcastle University
Claudio Franceschi
Claudio Franceschi University of Bologna
Kaare Christensen
Kaare Christensen University of Southern Denmark

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens the door to a wide variety of rewarding career paths, many of which now offer flexible online degrees. For those seeking administrative roles in the healthcare sector, consider the fast online master's in healthcare management programs, which allow you to complete your degree quickly and transition into management positions.

If you are passionate about mental health, you might explore the shortest pmhnp program. These programs prepare graduates for a fast-growing field as psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners, and can often be completed in less time than traditional pathways.

Those interested in nutrition can benefit from the fastest nutrition degree online options. These programs are designed to equip you with the latest knowledge in nutrition science and prepare you for diverse roles in health, wellness, and research.

For students looking for leadership roles coupled with affordability, the affordable online mba in healthcare management is an ideal choice. This degree offers flexibility, cost-effectiveness, and prepares you for senior-level positions in healthcare organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas B. L. Kirkwood

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles