World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
75
Citations
21522
World Ranking
1060
National Ranking
398

Gil Bohrer publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gil Bohrer sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 287 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Gil Bohrer D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gil Bohrer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gil Bohrer is affiliated with The Ohio State University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a strong emphasis on global and planetary change, ecology, and atmospheric science. Additional areas of study include ecological modeling and water science and technology.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics, including plant water relations and carbon dynamics, peatlands and wetlands ecology, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, wildlife ecology and conservation, remote sensing in agriculture, species distribution and climate change, and hydrology and watershed management studies.

Recent publications by Gil Bohrer include:

  • The FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance data, 2020, Scientific Data
  • Representativeness of Eddy-Covariance flux footprints for areas surrounding AmeriFlux sites, 2021, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
  • The Movebank system for studying global animal movement and demography, 2021, Methods in Ecology and Evolution
  • FLUXNET-CH 4: a global, multi-ecosystem dataset and analysis of methane seasonality from freshwater wetlands, 2021, Earth system science data
  • Global transpiration data from sap flow measurements: the SAPFLUXNET database, 2021, Earth system science data

Gil Bohrer frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Ankur R. Desai
  • Jorge A. Villa
  • Dennis Baldocchi
  • Housen Chu
  • Jiquan Chen

The scientist publishes regularly in a set of recurring venues, with a notable presence in the OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information), the Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, The Science of The Total Environment, and Global Change Biology.

Best Publications

  • The FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance data

    Gilberto Pastorello;Carlo Trotta;Eleonora Canfora;Housen Chu

  • Increase in forest water-use efficiency as atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations rise

    Trevor F. Keenan;David Y. Hollinger;Gil Bohrer;Danilo Dragoni

  • The increasing importance of atmospheric demand for ecosystem water and carbon fluxes

    Kimberly A. Novick;Darren L. Ficklin;Paul C. Stoy;Christopher A. Williams

  • Net carbon uptake has increased through warming-induced changes in temperate forest phenology

    Trevor F. Keenan;Trevor F. Keenan;Josh Gray;Mark A. Friedl;Michael Toomey

  • Terrestrial biosphere models need better representation of vegetation phenology: results from the North American Carbon Program Site Synthesis

    Andrew D. Richardson;Ryan S. Anderson;M. Altaf Arain;Alan G. Barr

  • Observed increase in local cooling effect of deforestation at higher latitudes

    Xuhui Lee;Michael L. Goulden;David Y. Hollinger;Alan Barr

  • Long-distance gene flow and adaptation of forest trees to rapid climate change

    Antoine Kremer;Antoine Kremer;Ophélie Ronce;Juan J. Robledo‐Arnuncio;Frédéric Guillaume

  • Representativeness of Eddy-Covariance flux footprints for areas surrounding AmeriFlux sites

    Housen Chu;Xiangzhong Luo;Xiangzhong Luo;Zutao Ouyang;W. Stephen Chan

  • The environmental-data automated track annotation ( Env - DATA ) system: linking animal tracks with environmental data

    Somayeh Dodge;Gil Bohrer;Rolf Weinzierl;Sarah C. Davidson

  • Moderating Argos location errors in animal tracking data

    David C. Douglas;Rolf Weinzierl;Sarah C. Davidson;Roland Kays;Roland Kays

  • ECOSTRESS: NASA's Next Generation Mission to Measure Evapotranspiration From the International Space Station

    Joshua B. Fisher;Brian Lee;Adam J. Purdy;Gregory H. Halverson

  • The role of canopy structural complexity in wood net primary production of a maturing northern deciduous forest

    Brady S Hardiman;Gil Bohrer;Christopher M Gough;Christopher M Gough;Christoph S Vogel

  • Methanogenesis in oxygenated soils is a substantial fraction of wetland methane emissions.

    Jordan C. Angle;Timothy H. Morin;Lindsey M. Solden;Adrienne B. Narrowe

  • Estimating updraft velocity components over large spatial scales: contrasting migration strategies of golden eagles and turkey vultures

    Gil Bohrer;David Brandes;James T. Mandel;Keith L. Bildstein

  • The Movebank system for studying global animal movement and demography

    Unknown

  • Land surface phenology derived from normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) at global FLUXNET sites

    Chaoyang Wu;Dailiang Peng;Kamel Soudani;Lukas Siebicke

  • Mechanistic models of seed dispersal by wind

    Ran Nathan;Gabriel G. Katul;Gabriel G. Katul;Gil Bohrer;Anna Kuparinen

  • FLUXNET-CH4 Synthesis Activity : Objectives, Observations, and Future Directions

    Sara H. Knox;Robert B. Jackson;Benjamin Poulter;Gavin McNicol

  • Fat, weather, and date affect migratory songbirds’ departure decisions, routes, and time it takes to cross the Gulf of Mexico

    Jill L. Deppe;Michael P. Ward;Rachel T. Bolus;Rachel T. Bolus;Robert H. Diehl

  • Use of change-point detection for friction–velocity threshold evaluation in eddy-covariance studies

    A.G. Barr;A.D. Richardson;D.Y. Hollinger;D. Papale

  • Global estimation of evapotranspiration using a leaf area index-based surface energy and water balance model

    H. Yan;S.Q. Wang;David P. Billesbach;Walter Oechel

  • Net Carbon Uptake Has Increased through Warming-Induced Changes in Temperate Forest Phenology

    T. F. Keenan;A. D. Richardson;J. M. Gray;M. A. Friedl

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher M. Gough
Christopher M. Gough Virginia Commonwealth University
Peter S. Curtis
Peter S. Curtis The Ohio State University
Ankur R. Desai
Ankur R. Desai University of Wisconsin–Madison
Andrew D. Richardson
Andrew D. Richardson Northern Arizona University
David Y. Hollinger
David Y. Hollinger US Forest Service
Valeriy Y. Ivanov
Valeriy Y. Ivanov University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Christoph S. Vogel
Christoph S. Vogel University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Martin Wikelski
Martin Wikelski Max Planck Institute for Ornithology
Trevor F. Keenan
Trevor F. Keenan Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Kimberly A. Novick
Kimberly A. Novick Indiana University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution often involves knowledge from diverse academic fields. Many students interested in these areas consider online degrees that develop cross-disciplinary skills, opening up flexible career opportunities.

For those drawn to the data and quantitative side of ecology, an online degree mathematics program can provide crucial analytical tools for ecological modeling and research. Creative minds passionate about communicating science visually may find a graphic design online degree valuable for crafting impactful educational materials or outreach campaigns.

If you want broad academic flexibility, an online interdisciplinary studies degree ranking affordable can help you tailor coursework to your interests in biology, environmental science, public policy, and beyond. For deeper specialization, pursuing an online masters in history may enrich your perspective on ecological change, conservation, or the human impact on natural systems.

By leveraging the wide array of online degrees related to Ecology and Evolution, you can create a personalized, flexible pathway that matches both your career goals and academic interests.

Best Scientists Citing Gil Bohrer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles