World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
57
Citations
31565
World Ranking
2626
National Ranking
931

Jessica Gurevitch publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jessica Gurevitch sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 138 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Jessica Gurevitch D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jessica Gurevitch sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Fellow of the Ecological Society of America (ESA)
  • 2010 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Jessica Gurevitch is affiliated with Stony Brook University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Environmental Science, with key focus areas including Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Ecological Modeling, and Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics such as Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Meta-analysis and systematic reviews, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Plant and animal studies, Animal testing and alternatives, Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications, and Climate Change and Geoengineering.

Recent publications by Jessica Gurevitch include:

  • Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension, 2021, Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
  • Reproducibility of animal research in light of biological variation, 2020, Nature reviews. Neuroscience
  • Potential ecological impacts of climate intervention by reflecting sunlight to cool Earth, 2021, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Consequences of multiple imputation of missing standard deviations and sample sizes in meta-analysis, 2020, Ecology and Evolution
  • Managing forests for competing goals, 2022, Science

Frequent co-authors in Jessica Gurevitch's research collaborations include:

  • Gordon A. Fox
  • Samuel M. Scheiner
  • John S. Kominoski
  • Debra P. C. Peters
  • David D. Breshears

Publication venues where the scientist has contributed notably include Ecosphere, Nature reviews. Neuroscience, Bulletin of the Ecological Society of America, Ecology and Evolution, and Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

Jessica Gurevitch has authored books published by Oxford University Press, notably "The Ecology of Plants" in 2020, which has been cited 270 times.

Awards recognizing Jessica Gurevitch's contributions include being named a Fellow of the Ecological Society of America (ESA) in 2013 and a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2010.

Best Publications

  • THE META-ANALYSIS OF RESPONSE RATIOS IN EXPERIMENTAL ECOLOGY

    Larry V. Hedges;Jessica Gurevitch;Peter S. Curtis

  • A meta-analysis of the response of soil respiration, net nitrogen mineralization, and aboveground plant growth to experimental ecosystem warming

    L.E. Rustad;J.L. Campbell;G.M. Marion;R.J. Norby

  • Are invasive species a major cause of extinctions

    Jessica Gurevitch;Dianna K. Padilla

  • Meta-analysis and the science of research synthesis

    Jessica Gurevitch;Julia Koricheva;Shinichi Nakagawa;Gavin Stewart

  • Jack of all trades, master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions

    Christina L. Richards;Oliver Bossdorf;Norris Z. Muth;Jessica Gurevitch

  • Handbook of Meta-analysis in Ecology and Evolution

    Julia Koricheva;Jessica Gurevitch;Kerrie L. Mengersen

  • STATISTICAL ISSUES IN ECOLOGICAL META‐ANALYSES

    Jessica Gurevitch;Larry V. Hedges

  • RESPONSES OF TUNDRA PLANTS TO EXPERIMENTAL WARMING:META‐ANALYSIS OF THE INTERNATIONAL TUNDRA EXPERIMENT

    A. M. Arft;M. D. Walker;J. Gurevitch;J. M. Alatalo

  • Global Warming and Terrestrial Ecosystems: A Conceptual Framework for Analysis

    Gaius R. Shaver;Josep Canadell;F. S. Chapin;Jessica Gurevitch

  • A Meta-Analysis of Competition in Field Experiments

    Jessica Gurevitch;Laura L. Morrow;Alison Wallace;Joseph S. Walsh

  • The consequences of spatial structure for the design and analysis of ecological field surveys

    Pierre Legendre;Mark R. T. Dale;Marie-Josée Fortin;Jessica Gurevitch

  • The ecology of plants

    Jessica Gurevitch;Samuel M. Scheiner;Gordon A. Fox

  • RESAMPLING TESTS FOR META-ANALYSIS OF ECOLOGICAL DATA

    Dean C. Adams;Jessica Gurevitch;Michael S. Rosenberg

  • Responses of insect pests, pathogens, and invasive plant species to climate change in the forests of northeastern North America: What can

    Jeffrey S. DukesJ.S. Dukes;Jennifer PontiusJ. Pontius;David OrwigD. Orwig;Jeffrey R. GarnasJ.R. Garnas

  • EMPIRICAL APPROACHES TO QUANTIFYING INTERACTION INTENSITY: COMPETITION AND FACILITATION ALONG PRODUCTIVITY GRADIENTS

    Deborah E. Goldberg;Tara Rajaniemi;Jessica Gurevitch;Allan Stewart-Oaten

  • Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses in ecology and evolutionary biology: a PRISMA extension.

    Rose E. O'Dea;Malgorzata Lagisz;Michael D. Jennions;Julia Koricheva

  • The Interaction between Competition and Predation: A Meta-analysis of Field Experiments.

    Jessica Gurevitch;Janet A. Morrison;Larry V. Hedges

  • Meta-analysis in ecology

    Jessica Gurevitch;Peter S. Curtis;Michael H. Jones

  • Uses and misuses of meta‐analysis in plant ecology

    Julia Koricheva;Jessica Gurevitch

  • Emergent insights from the synthesis of conceptual frameworks for biological invasions

    J. Gurevitch;G. A. Fox;G. M. Wardle;Inderjit

  • Biological invasions: a field synopsis, systematic review, and database of the literature

    Edward Lowry;Emily J. Rollinson;Adam J. Laybourn;Tracy E. Scott;Tracy E. Scott

Frequent Co-Authors

Shinichi Nakagawa
Shinichi Nakagawa University of New South Wales
Julia Koricheva
Julia Koricheva Royal Holloway University of London
Ralf Seppelt
Ralf Seppelt Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Wolfgang Forstmeier
Wolfgang Forstmeier Max Planck Society
Kerrie Mengersen
Kerrie Mengersen Queensland University of Technology
Manuel T. Lerdau
Manuel T. Lerdau University of Virginia
Christopher H. Schmid
Christopher H. Schmid Brown University
John Harte
John Harte University of California, Berkeley
Larry V. Hedges
Larry V. Hedges Northwestern University
Josep G. Canadell
Josep G. Canadell Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution in the USA opens doors to diverse interdisciplinary careers. Many students interested in scientific research, environmental advocacy, or wildlife conservation also consider related pathways that address human behavior and community well-being.

For those passionate about understanding the psychological factors behind environmental action or community health, a background in psychology can be invaluable. Online programs such as an online child psychology masters provide insights into developmental behaviors, which can support educational and outreach roles within ecological organizations.

Students seeking to combine counseling skills with ecological expertise may explore counseling masters programs online or look into clinical psychologist online programs. These paths enable graduates to support mental health in communities impacted by environmental change.

Additionally, a online human services degree can empower graduates to assist diverse populations, advocate for social change, and promote environmental justice. Pairing an ecology degree with these online programs can lead to impactful roles at the intersection of science, advocacy, and human services.

Best Scientists Citing Jessica Gurevitch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles