World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jeroen P. van der Sluijs

Jeroen P. van der Sluijs

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
47
Citations
11779
World Ranking
5684
National Ranking
68

Jeroen P. van der Sluijs publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeroen P. van der Sluijs sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 88 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Jeroen P. van der Sluijs D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeroen P. van der Sluijs sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jeroen P. van der Sluijs is affiliated with the University of Bergen in Norway and specializes in environmental science, with a focus on sustainability and climate change governance. Their research extensively covers global and planetary change, management, monitoring, policy and law, as well as sociology and political science. Insect science and ecology also represent key subfields within their body of work.

Their scientific output addresses a range of topics related to environmental and social impact assessments, sustainable development and environmental policy, and climate change policy and economics. In particular, their work emphasizes insect and pesticide research alongside plant and animal studies, and climate change communication and perception.

Jeroen's recent publications include:

  • "Insect decline, an emerging global environmental risk," 2020, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability
  • "Five ways to ensure that models serve society: a manifesto," 2020, Nature (authored by Andrea Saltelli but frequently cited together)
  • "The technique is never neutral. How methodological choices condition the generation of narratives for sustainability," 2020, Environmental Science & Policy (authored by Andrea Saltelli)
  • "[Post-Normal Pandemics: why CoViD-19 requires a new approach to science.]," 2020, PubMed (authored by David Waltner-Toews)
  • "Pollinator conservation requires a stronger and broader application of the precautionary principle," 2021, Current Opinion in Insect Science

Frequent collaborators with whom Jeroen has co-authored multiple works include:

  • Andrea Saltelli
  • Samuele Lo Piano
  • Arnald Puy
  • Erik S. Reinert
  • Máté János Lőrincz

Jeroen has published regularly in prominent journals such as Frontiers in Climate, Environmental Science & Policy, Current Opinion in Insect Science, SSRN Electronic Journal, and Nature. Their work situates at the intersection of environmental science disciplines, contributing to ongoing discussions on environmental sustainability, governance, and the precautionary principle in conservation efforts.

Best Publications

  • Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process - A framework and guidance

    Jens Christian Refsgaard;Jeroen P. van der Sluijs;Anker Lajer Højberg;Peter A. Vanrolleghem

  • A framework for dealing with uncertainty due to model structure error

    Jens Christian Refsgaard;Jeroen P. van der Sluijs;James Brown;Peter van der Keur

  • Neonicotinoids, bee disorders and the sustainability of pollinator services

    Jeroen P van der Sluijs;Noa Simon-Delso;Dave Goulson;Laura Maxim

  • Risks of large-scale use of systemic insecticides to ecosystem functioning and services

    Madeleine Chagnon;David Kreutzweiser;Edward A.D. Mitchell;Christy A. Morrissey

  • Combining quantitative and qualitative measures of uncertainty in model-based environmental assessment: the NUSAP system.

    Jeroen P. Van Der Sluijs;Matthieu Craye;Silvio Funtowicz;Penny Kloprogge

  • Macro-invertebrate decline in surface water polluted with imidacloprid.

    Tessa C. Van Dijk;Marja A. Van Staalduinen;Jeroen P. Van der Sluijs

  • Operationalising a resilience approach to adapting an urban delta to uncertain climate changes

    J. Arjan Wardekker;Arie de Jong;Joost M. Knoop;Jeroen P. van der Sluijs

  • Five ways to ensure that models serve society: a manifesto.

    Andrea Saltelli;Gabriele Bammer;Isabelle Bruno;Erica Charters

  • The use of expert elicitation in environmental health impact assessment: a seven step procedure.

    Anne B Knol;Pauline Slottje;Jeroen P van der Sluijs;Jeroen P van der Sluijs;Erik Lebret

  • Anchoring Devices in Science for Policy: The Case of Consensus around Climate Sensitivity

    Jeroen van der Sluijs;Josée van Eijndhoven;Simon Shackley;Brian Wynne

  • An update of the Worldwide Integrated Assessment (WIA) on systemic insecticides. Part 2: impacts on organisms and ecosystems.

    Lennard Pisa;Dave Goulson;En-Cheng Yang;David Gibbons

  • Expert elicitation on ultrafine particles: likelihood of health effects and causal pathways

    Anne B Knol;Jeroen J de Hartog;Hanna Boogaard;Pauline Slottje

  • Adaptation to climate change related risks in Dutch urban areas: stimuli and barriers

    Hens Runhaar;Heleen Mees;Arjan Wardekker;Jeroen van der Sluijs

  • A way out of the credibility crisis of models used in integrated environmental assessment

    Jeroen P. van der Sluijs

  • Ethics and public perception of climate change: Exploring the Christian voices in the US public debate

    J. Arjan Wardekker;J. Arjan Wardekker;Arthur C. Petersen;Jeroen P. van der Sluijs

  • Concentration response functions for ultrafine particles and all-cause mortality and hospital admissions: results of a European expert panel elicitation.

    Gerard Hoek;Hanna Boogaard;Anne Knol;Jeroen de Hartog

  • Toward a multi-faceted conception of co-production of climate services

    Scott Bremer;Arjan Wardekker;Arjan Wardekker;Suraje Dessai;Stefan Pieter Sobolowski

  • Uncertainty as a monster in the science–policy interface: four coping strategies

    Jeroen P. van der Sluijs

  • Model projections for household energy use in India

    Bas J. van Ruijven;Detlef P. van Vuuren;Bert J.M. de Vries;Morna Isaac

  • The inclusion of stakeholder knowledge and perspectives in integrated assessment of climate change

    Penny Kloprogge;Jeroen P. Van Der Sluijs

  • Exploring the quality of evidence for complex and contested policy decisions

    Jeroen P van der Sluijs;Jeroen P van der Sluijs;Arthur C Petersen;Peter H M Janssen;James S Risbey

Frequent Co-Authors

Arthur C. Petersen
Arthur C. Petersen University College London
Andrea Saltelli
Andrea Saltelli UPF Barcelona School of Management
Jerome R. Ravetz
Jerome R. Ravetz University of Oxford
James S. Risbey
James S. Risbey Illinois Tool Works (United States)
Mario Giampietro
Mario Giampietro Autonomous University of Barcelona
Erik Lebret
Erik Lebret Utrecht University
Bas J. van Ruijven
Bas J. van Ruijven International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis
Gerard Hoek
Gerard Hoek Utrecht University
Detlef P. van Vuuren
Detlef P. van Vuuren Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, online degree options offer flexible pathways in related fields. A bachelors degree in sociology online provides insight into social behaviors and structures, crucial for addressing environmental impacts on communities.

Advancing to graduate studies can open doors to leadership and research roles. Many look into doctoral programs online no dissertation for a streamlined experience without the traditional dissertation barrier. These programs are ideal for working professionals seeking terminal degrees with practical applications.

For educators aiming to specialize further, transitioning through eds to edd programs online offers a structured progression from advanced teaching credentials to doctoral expertise, often with flexible schedules designed for online learners.

Social work also intersects with environmental advocacy. The availability of online dsw programs provides an affordable pathway to doctoral qualifications, preparing graduates to influence policy and community health related to environmental challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Jeroen P. van der Sluijs

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles