What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Statistics
- Hydrology
- Ecology
His primary scientific interests are in Hydrology, GLUE, Surface runoff, Equifinality and Hydrograph.
In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Hydrology, Topographic Wetness Index and Spatial variability is strongly linked to Structural basin.
His GLUE research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Uncertainty analysis, Statistics, Range, Sample and Algorithm.
His research in Surface runoff intersects with topics in Storm, Soil science, Water table and Infiltration.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Statistical hypothesis testing, Management science, Calibration, Econometrics and Operations research.
His research investigates the connection between Hydrograph and topics such as Flow that intersect with problems in Calibration.
His most cited work include:
- A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology / Un modèle à base physique de zone d'appel variable de l'hydrologie du bassin versant (3985 citations)
- A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology (3605 citations)
- The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. (3210 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Keith Beven mainly investigates Hydrology, Flood myth, GLUE, Surface runoff and Drainage basin.
Keith Beven interconnects Soil science and Soil water in the investigation of issues within Hydrology.
His research investigates the connection with GLUE and areas like Econometrics which intersect with concerns in Uncertainty analysis.
Many of his studies involve connections with topics such as Infiltration and Surface runoff.
Drainage basin is often connected to Structural basin in his work.
His Flood forecasting research includes elements of Probabilistic logic and Operations research.
He most often published in these fields:
- Hydrology (48.31%)
- Flood myth (19.09%)
- GLUE (18.80%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2021)?
- Hydrology (48.31%)
- Flood myth (19.09%)
- Hydrology (11.31%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of investigation include Hydrology, Flood myth, Hydrology, Operations research and Drainage basin.
His studies deal with areas such as Scale and Flow as well as Hydrology.
His Flood myth research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Floodplain, Meteorology, Communication channel and Flooding.
His research in Hydrology focuses on subjects like Streamflow, which are connected to Climatology.
His studies in Operations research integrate themes in fields like Calibration and validation, Uncertainty analysis, Flood forecasting and GLUE.
His Drainage basin study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Piezometer and Water table.
Between 2013 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Sensitivity analysis of environmental models (457 citations)
- Debates—The future of hydrological sciences: A (common) path forward? A call to action aimed at understanding velocities, celerities and residence time distributions of the headwater hydrograph (242 citations)
- GLUE: 20 years on (154 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Statistics
- Ecology
- Hydrology
His scientific interests lie mostly in Hydrology, Management science, Flood myth, GLUE and Hydrology.
His Hydrology study deals with Flow intersecting with Water content.
His Management science research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Variation and Socio-hydrology.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Uncertainty analysis, Floodplain, Environmental planning and Scale.
His work carried out in the field of GLUE brings together such families of science as Operations research, Algorithm, Differential evolution and Equifinality.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Drainage basin, Representation and Groundwater in addition to Hydrology.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
