World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
8407
World Ranking
8755
National Ranking
882

David Crundall publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Crundall sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 147 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David Crundall D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Crundall sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Crundall is affiliated with Nottingham Trent University in the United Kingdom. Their research spans several key areas including psychology and engineering, with a focus on social psychology and safety-related subfields.

The primary research topics covered in their work include traffic and road safety, human-automation interaction and safety, safety warnings and signage, occupational health and safety research, urban transport and accessibility, injury epidemiology and prevention, and behavioral health and interventions.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Accident Analysis & Prevention
  • Applied Cognitive Psychology
  • Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Behavior Research Methods

David Crundall has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Andrew Mackenzie
  • Petya Ventsislavova
  • Michael Vernon
  • Duncan Guest
  • Christina J. Howard

Some of their recent papers include:

  • A novel driving assessment combining hazard perception, hazard prediction and theory questions (2020), published in Accident Analysis & Prevention
  • Assessing Willingness to Engage in Risky Driving Behaviour Using Naturalistic Driving Footage: The Role of Age and Gender (2021), published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • The Multiple Object Avoidance (MOA) task measures attention for action: Evidence from driving and sport (2021), published in Behavior Research Methods
  • Creating a hazard-based training and assessment tool for emergency response drivers (2020), published in Accident Analysis & Prevention
  • Risky Decision-Making and Hazard Prediction are Negatively Related and Could Be Assessed Independently Using Driving Footage (2021), published in Psychology Research and Behavior Management

Best Publications

  • Visual attention while driving: sequences of eye fixations made by experienced and novice drivers

    Geoffrey Underwood;Peter Chapman;Neil Brocklehurst;Jean Underwood

  • Effects of experience and processing demands on visual information acquisition in drivers

    David E. Crundall;Geoffrey Underwood

  • Driver's visual attention as a function of driving experience and visibility. Using a driving simulator to explore drivers' eye movements in day, night and rain driving

    Panos Konstantopoulos;Peter Chapman;David Crundall

  • Anger while driving

    Geoffrey Underwood;Peter Chapman;Sharon Wright;David Crundall

  • VISUAL SEARCH WHILE DRIVING: SKILL AND AWARENESS DURING INSPECTION OF THE SCENE

    Geoffrey Underwood;Peter Chapman;Karen Bowden;David Crundall

  • Driving simulator validation with hazard perception

    Geoffrey J. Underwood;David Crundall;Peter Chapman

  • Driving experience and the functional field of view.

    David Crundall;Geoffrey J. Underwood;Peter Chapman

  • Some hazards are more attractive than others: Drivers of varying experience respond differently to different types of hazard

    David Crundall;Peter Chapman;Steven Trawley;Lyn Collins

  • Selective searching while driving: the role of experience in hazard detection and general surveillance.

    Geoffrey J. Underwood;David Crundall;Peter Chapman

  • What happens next? Predicting other road users' behaviour as a function of driving experience and processing time

    Lyn Jackson;Peter Chapman;David Crundall

  • Eye movements and hazard perception in police pursuit and emergency response driving.

    David Crundall;Peter Chapman;Nicola Phelps;Geoffrey J. Underwood

  • Hazard prediction discriminates between novice and experienced drivers

    David Crundall

  • Attending to the peripheral world while driving

    David Crundall;Geoffrey J. Underwood;Peter Chapman

  • Commentary training improves responsiveness to hazards in a driving simulator

    David Crundall;Ben Andrews;Editha van Loon;Peter Chapman

  • Attraction and distraction of attention with roadside advertisements.

    David Crundall;Editha Van Loon;Geoffrey J. Underwood

  • An application of the theory of planned behaviour to truck driving behaviour and compliance with regulations

    Damian R. Poulter;Peter Chapman;Peter A. Bibby;David D. Clarke

  • Why do car drivers fail to give way to motorcycles at t-junctions?

    David Crundall;Elizabeth Crundall;Duncan Clarke;Amit Shahar

  • Regulating Conversation During Driving: A Problem for Mobile Telephones?

    David Crundall;Manpreet Bains;Peter Chapman;Geoffrey J. Underwood

  • Driving experience, attentional focusing, and the recall of recently inspected events

    Geoffrey Underwood;Peter Chapman;Zoë Berger;David Crundall

  • Change blindness in driving scenes

    Adam Galpin;Geoffrey J. Underwood;David Crundall

  • Cognitive Ethology : A new approach for studying human cognition. Commentaries. Authors' reply

    Alan Kingstone;Daniel Smilek;John D Eastwood;David Crundall

Frequent Co-Authors

Geoffrey Underwood
Geoffrey Underwood University of Nottingham
Peter Chapman
Peter Chapman University of Nottingham
Abdulbari Bener
Abdulbari Bener University of Manchester
David D. Clarke
David D. Clarke University of Nottingham
David Shinar
David Shinar Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Timo Lajunen
Timo Lajunen Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Alan Kingstone
Alan Kingstone University of British Columbia
Juan Lupiáñez
Juan Lupiáñez University of Granada
John D. Eastwood
John D. Eastwood York University
Daniel Smilek
Daniel Smilek University of Waterloo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a psychology degree in the USA opens the door to many fulfilling careers, including social work and counseling. Many students consider pursuing social work, which often requires additional licensure and specialized online degrees or certificates. Requirements to become a social worker can vary widely by state.

For example, if you plan to practice in Alabama, it's crucial to understand Alabama social work license requirements before enrolling in a program. Those interested in working in Alaska should carefully review Alaska social work education requirements to ensure their degree leads to eligibility.

If your career goals include living in Arizona, be sure to familiarize yourself with Arizona social work license requirements. Additionally, each state—such as Arkansas—has its own steps; learn more about the requirements to be a social worker in Arkansas.

Before committing to an online degree or career pathway, take the time to research your state's specific guidelines and accreditation standards to ensure a smooth transition from education to employment.

Best Scientists Citing David Crundall

Trending Scientists