World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
7731
World Ranking
8774
National Ranking
885

Tom Foulsham publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom Foulsham sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 127 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Tom Foulsham D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom Foulsham sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tom Foulsham is affiliated with the University of Essex in the United Kingdom and works primarily in the fields of Neuroscience and Psychology. Their research spans several interconnected domains with a strong focus on cognitive and developmental aspects of visual processing and behavior.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Neuroscience
  • Psychology

Subfields of study where they have published include:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Education

The primary research topics covered in their work are:

  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology

Tom Foulsham has published in several scholarly venues, frequently contributing to:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Vision
  • Scientific Reports
  • Behavior Research Methods
  • International Journal of Developmental Disabilities

The scientist has collaborated extensively with colleagues, often co-authoring papers with:

  • Alan Kingstone
  • Astrid Priscilla Martinez-Cedillo
  • Dimitri Ognibene
  • Phoebe Morris
  • Edward Hope

Recent notable publications by Tom Foulsham include:

  • RETRACTED ARTICLE: Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline (2022) published in Behavior Research Methods
  • Eye gaze and visual attention as a window into leadership and followership: A review of empirical insights and future directions (2022) published in The Leadership Quarterly
  • Visual search in ADHD, ASD and ASD + ADHD: overlapping or dissociating disorders? (2020) published in European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Parent-reported social-communication changes in children diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK (2021) published in International Journal of Developmental Disabilities
  • Turning the (virtual) world around: Patterns in saccade direction vary with picture orientation and shape in virtual reality (2020) published in Journal of Vision

Best Publications

  • Two ways to the top: evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence.

    Joey T. Cheng;Jessica L. Tracy;Tom Foulsham;Alan Kingstone

  • The where, what and when of gaze allocation in the lab and the natural environment.

    Tom Foulsham;Esther Walker;Alan Kingstone

  • What can saliency models predict about eye movements? Spatial and sequential aspects of fixations during encoding and recognition

    Tom Foulsham;Geoffrey Underwood

  • Social attention with real versus reel stimuli: toward an empirical approach to concerns about ecological validity.

    Evan F. Risko;Kaitlin E. W. Laidlaw;Megan Freeth;Tom Foulsham

  • Potential social interactions are important to social attention

    Kaitlin E. W. Laidlaw;Tom Foulsham;Gustav Kuhn;Alan Kingstone

  • Gaze allocation in a dynamic situation: effects of social status and speaking.

    Tom Foulsham;Joey T. Cheng;Jessica L. Tracy;Joseph Henrich

  • Visual saliency and semantic incongruency influence eye movements when inspecting pictures

    Geoffrey Underwood;Tom Foulsham

  • What Affects Social Attention? Social Presence, Eye Contact and Autistic Traits

    Megan Freeth;Tom Foulsham;Alan Kingstone

  • Speaking and Listening with the Eyes: Gaze Signaling during Dyadic Interactions

    Simon Ho;Tom Foulsham;Alan Kingstone

  • It depends on how you look at it: Scanpath comparison in multiple dimensions with MultiMatch, a vector-based approach

    Richard Dewhurst;Marcus Nyström;Halszka Jarodzka;Tom Foulsham

  • Eye movements during scene inspection: A test of the saliency map hypothesis

    Geoffrey Underwood;Tom Foulsham;Editha van Loon;Louise Humphreys

  • How does the purpose of inspection influence the potency of visual salience in scene perception

    Tom Foulsham;Geoffrey Underwood

  • Is attention necessary for object identification? Evidence from eye movements during the inspection of real-world scenes

    Geoffrey J. Underwood;Emma Templeman;Laura Lamming;Tom Foulsham

  • Turning the world around : Patterns in saccade direction vary with picture orientation

    Tom Foulsham;Alan Kingstone;Geoffrey Underwood

  • Mind wandering in sentence reading: decoupling the link between mind and eye.

    Tom Foulsham;James Farley;Alan Kingstone

  • Leftward biases in picture scanning and line bisection: a gaze-contingent window study.

    Tom Foulsham;Alexander Gray;Eleni Nasiopoulos;Alan Kingstone

  • Saliency and scan patterns in the inspection of real-world scenes: Eye movements during encoding and recognition

    Geoffrey Underwood;Tom Foulsham;Katherine Humphrey

  • Reading Without Words: Eye Movements in the Comprehension of Comic Strips

    Tom Foulsham;Dean P Wybrow;Neil Cohn

  • Fixation-dependent memory for natural scenes: an experimental test of scanpath theory.

    Tom Foulsham;Alan Kingstone

  • On the dynamics of social hierarchy: A longitudinal investigation of the rise and fall of prestige, dominance, and social rank in naturalistic task groups.

    Daniel J Redhead;Joey T Cheng;Charles Driver;Tom Foulsham

  • Understanding sources of social desirability bias in different modes: Evidence from eye-tracking

    Olena Kaminska;Tom Foulsham

Frequent Co-Authors

Alan Kingstone
Alan Kingstone University of British Columbia
Geoffrey Underwood
Geoffrey Underwood University of Nottingham
Christoph Klein
Christoph Klein University of Freiburg
Neil Cohn
Neil Cohn Tilburg University
Kenneth Holmqvist
Kenneth Holmqvist University of Regensburg
Evan F. Risko
Evan F. Risko University of Waterloo
Nikolaos Smyrnis
Nikolaos Smyrnis National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer
Ulrich W. Ebner-Priemer Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Jason J. S. Barton
Jason J. S. Barton University of British Columbia
Jessica L. Tracy
Jessica L. Tracy University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology in the USA can open doors to a variety of meaningful careers, including marriage and family therapy (MFT). Aspiring therapists often begin with an undergraduate degree in psychology, followed by a specialized master’s program. Many online degrees now offer the flexibility to balance study with work or family commitments.

Each state has specific educational and licensing requirements for MFTs, so it’s essential to research your intended location. For those wondering how to become an mft in Arlington or are interested in mft requirements in Atlanta, there are detailed guides available. Similarly, you can learn the steps on how to become an mft in Aurora and the unique mft requirements in Austin.

With the growing availability of accredited online programs, pursuing a career in counseling, therapy, or mental health is more accessible than ever. Be sure to explore state-specific requirements and choose programs that align with your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Tom Foulsham

Trending Scientists