World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
69
Citations
16539
World Ranking
2381
National Ranking
261

Geoffrey Underwood publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geoffrey Underwood sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 225 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Geoffrey Underwood D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geoffrey Underwood sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Geoffrey Underwood is affiliated with the University of Nottingham in the United Kingdom. Their professional activities are primarily situated within this academic institution.

The available data does not include information about recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues related to Geoffrey Underwood. Similarly, there are no recorded book publications or specified main fields, subfields, or topics of study linked to their work.

No awards or honors have been documented for Geoffrey Underwood based on the current data.

This profile presents a concise overview based on the provided information, without assumptions or extrapolations beyond the recorded details.

Best Publications

  • Visual attention while driving: sequences of eye fixations made by experienced and novice drivers

    Geoffrey Underwood;Peter Chapman;Neil Brocklehurst;Jean Underwood

  • Effects of experience and processing demands on visual information acquisition in drivers

    David E. Crundall;Geoffrey Underwood

  • VISUAL SEARCH OF DRIVING SITUATIONS: DANGER AND EXPERIENCE

    Peter R Chapman;Geoffrey Underwood

  • What can saliency models predict about eye movements? Spatial and sequential aspects of fixations during encoding and recognition

    Tom Foulsham;Geoffrey Underwood

  • Visual attention and the transition from novice to advanced driver

    Geoffrey J. Underwood

  • Anger while driving

    Geoffrey Underwood;Peter Chapman;Sharon Wright;David Crundall

  • VISUAL SEARCH WHILE DRIVING: SKILL AND AWARENESS DURING INSPECTION OF THE SCENE

    Geoffrey Underwood;Peter Chapman;Karen Bowden;David Crundall

  • Driving simulator validation with hazard perception

    Geoffrey J. Underwood;David Crundall;Peter Chapman

  • Driving experience and the functional field of view.

    David Crundall;Geoffrey J. Underwood;Peter Chapman

  • Some hazards are more attractive than others: Drivers of varying experience respond differently to different types of hazard

    David Crundall;Peter Chapman;Steven Trawley;Lyn Collins

  • Computers and learning: Helping children acquire thinking skills

    Jean D. M. Underwood;Geoffrey Underwood

  • VISUAL SEARCH PATTERNS IN TRAINED AND UNTRAINED NOVICE DRIVERS

    Peter Chapman;Geoffrey Underwood;Katherine L. Roberts

  • Visual saliency and semantic incongruency influence eye movements when inspecting pictures

    Geoffrey Underwood;Tom Foulsham

  • Selective searching while driving: the role of experience in hazard detection and general surveillance.

    Geoffrey J. Underwood;David Crundall;Peter Chapman

  • SEMANTIC INTERFERENCE FROM UNATTENDED PRINTED WORDS

    Geoffrey Underwood

  • Eye movements and hazard perception in police pursuit and emergency response driving.

    David Crundall;Peter Chapman;Nicola Phelps;Geoffrey J. Underwood

  • The eyes have it: An eye-movement study into the processing of formulaic sequences

    Geoffrey Underwood;Norbert Schmitt;Adam Galpin

  • Attending to the peripheral world while driving

    David Crundall;Geoffrey J. Underwood;Peter Chapman

  • Eye fixation scanpaths of younger and older drivers in a hazard perception task

    Geoffrey Underwood;Nicola Phelps;Chloe Wright;Editha van Loon

  • Attraction and distraction of attention with roadside advertisements.

    David Crundall;Editha Van Loon;Geoffrey J. Underwood

  • Lexical recognition of embedded unattended words: Some implications for reading processes☆

    Geoffrey Underwood

  • Cognitive Ethology : A new approach for studying human cognition. Commentaries. Authors' reply

    Alan Kingstone;Daniel Smilek;John D Eastwood;David Crundall

Frequent Co-Authors

David Crundall
David Crundall Nottingham Trent University
Peter Chapman
Peter Chapman University of Nottingham
Tom Foulsham
Tom Foulsham University of Essex
Alan Kingstone
Alan Kingstone University of British Columbia
Michael G. Lenné
Michael G. Lenné Monash University
Norbert Schmitt
Norbert Schmitt University of Nottingham
Simon Paul Liversedge
Simon Paul Liversedge University of Central Lancashire
Pekka Niemi
Pekka Niemi University of Turku
Jukka Hyönä
Jukka Hyönä University of Turku
Danielle Ropar
Danielle Ropar University of Nottingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens a variety of pathways, from clinical work to research and beyond. Many universities across the U.S. now offer online programs recognized for academic excellence, flexibility, and career readiness. For students seeking strong program options, comparing the best psychology degree programs ranking in Grand Forks highlights universities that excel in research and student outcomes.

Similarly, students interested in urban psychology or applied settings can review the best psychology degree programs ranking in Grand Rapids for a range of programs that emphasize hands-on experience and internships.

Choosing the right program is crucial for future career paths in counseling, mental health services, human resources, or academia. The best psychology degree rankings in Greenville provide insight into programs tailored for those considering licensure or further graduate study.

For students seeking diverse career networks, the top psychology degrees in Houston showcase institutions with extensive alumni connections and clinical partnerships. Researching top-ranked online degrees can help align your education with your career goals in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Geoffrey Underwood

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles