World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jason W. Osborne

Jason W. Osborne

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
44
Citations
36904
World Ranking
3963
National Ranking
1879

Jason W. Osborne publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jason W. Osborne sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 108 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Jason W. Osborne D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jason W. Osborne sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jason W. Osborne is affiliated with Miami University in the United States. Their research output includes a number of papers published primarily through Scholarworks at the University of Massachusetts Amherst, with several contributions in other venues such as Nursing Practice Today, BMC Psychology, Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine, and Frontiers in Psychology.

The scientist's notable recent publications include:

  • Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis (2020) published in Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst)
  • Improving your data transformations: Applying the Box-Cox transformation (2020) published in Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst)
  • The power of outliers (and why researchers should ALWAYS check for them) (2020) published in Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst)
  • Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal components analysis (2020) published in Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst)
  • Notes on the use of data transformations (2020) published in Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst)

Their frequent collaborators include Hamid Sharif Nia, Erika Sivarajan Froelicher, Özkan Görgülü, Fatemeh Khoshnavay Fomani, and Poorya Nowrozi.

Jason W. Osborne's research spans multiple fields and subfields, notably:

  • Statistics and Probability
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Management Science and Operations Research
  • Social Psychology
  • Materials Chemistry

Topics covered in their work reflect a focus on advanced statistical methods and their applications, including:

  • Advanced Statistical Methods and Models
  • Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Diverse Scientific and Engineering Research
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

The publication venues with recurrent appearances of their work include:

  • Scholarworks (University of Massachusetts Amherst)
  • Nursing Practice Today
  • BMC Psychology
  • Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
  • Frontiers in Psychology

Jason W. Osborne's contributions largely concentrate on exploratory factor analysis, data transformations, outlier effects, and sample size considerations in statistical analyses. Their body of work embraces both statistical methodology and its relevance to psychological and clinical research contexts.

Best Publications

  • Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis.

    Anna B. Costello;Jason Osborne

  • Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis: Four Recommendations for Getting the Most from Your Analysis

    Jason W. Osborne;Anna B. Costello

  • The power of outliers (and why researchers should ALWAYS check for them)

    Jason W. Osborne;Amy Overbay

  • Best Practices in Quantitative Methods

    Jason W. Osborne

  • Improving your data transformations: Applying the Box-Cox transformation

    Jason W. Osborne

  • Sample size and subject to item ratio in principal components analysis.

    Jason W. Osborne;Anna B. Costello

  • Notes on the use of data transformations.

    Jason W. Osborne

  • Best Practices in Exploratory Factor Analysis

    Jason W. Osborne

  • Race and Academic Disidentification

    Jason W. Osborne

  • Is inquiry possible in light of accountability?: A quantitative comparison of the relative effectiveness of guided inquiry and verification laboratory instruction

    Margaret R. Blanchard;Sherry A. Southerland;Jason W. Osborne;Victor D. Sampson

  • Testing Stereotype Threat: Does Anxiety Explain Race and Sex Differences in Achievement?

    Jason W. Osborne

  • Advantages of Hierarchical Linear Modeling.

    Jason W. Osborne

  • Academics, Self-Esteem, and Race: A Look at the Underlying Assumptions of the Disidentification Hypothesis:

    Jason W. Osborne

  • The Development of the STEM Career Interest Survey (STEM-CIS)

    Meredith W. Kier;Margaret R. Blanchard;Jason W. Osborne;Jennifer L. Albert

  • Best Practices in Logistic Regression

    Jason W. Osborne

  • Metacognitive Monitoring Accuracy and Student Performance in the Postsecondary Classroom.

    John L. Nietfeld;Li Cao;Jason W. Osborne

  • Replication Analysis in Exploratory Factor Analysis: What it is and why it makes your analysis better

    Jason W. Osborne;David C. Fitzpatrick

  • The effect of distributed monitoring exercises and feedback on performance, monitoring accuracy, and self-efficacy

    John L. Nietfeld;Li Cao;Jason W. Osborne

  • Best Practices in Data Cleaning: A Complete Guide to Everything You Need to Do Before and After Collecting Your Data

    Jason W. Osborne

  • Old and New Ideas for Data Screening and Assumption Testing for Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis

    David B. Flora;Cathy LaBrish;R. Philip Chalmers

Frequent Co-Authors

Brett D. Jones
Brett D. Jones Virginia Tech
Gordon J.G. Asmundson
Gordon J.G. Asmundson University of Regina
R. Nicholas Carleton
R. Nicholas Carleton University of Regina
Steven Taylor
Steven Taylor University of British Columbia
Peter Gallagher
Peter Gallagher Newcastle University
Dennis M. McInerney
Dennis M. McInerney Education University of Hong Kong
Carolyn B. Mervis
Carolyn B. Mervis University of Louisville
Sherry A. Southerland
Sherry A. Southerland Florida State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to many rewarding careers, and pursuing an online degree can make this journey more accessible. Today, students can choose from a range of programs that blend academic rigor with the flexibility needed for modern life.

For those interested in counseling, consider looking into cacrep accredited online counseling programs. These programs ensure you receive quality education aligned with professional standards. If helping couples and families is your calling, online mft programs accredited can help you earn the credentials required for marriage and family therapy roles.

Psychology remains a popular pathway, with many institutions now offering online degrees for psychology that cater to those aiming for clinical, research, or educational careers. Additionally, if social work interests you, there are options like the easiest msw online program to get into, providing a more accessible route for aspiring social workers.

Choosing the right online program is key—consider accreditation, affordability, and your long-term career goals as you take the next step.

Best Scientists Citing Jason W. Osborne

Trending Scientists