World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
38
Citations
6994
World Ranking
8807
National Ranking
592

Todd G. Morrison publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd G. Morrison sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 136 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Todd G. Morrison D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Todd G. Morrison sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Todd G. Morrison is affiliated with the University of Saskatchewan in Canada and has contributed extensively to the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology. Their scholarly work spans several subfields, including Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

Their research focuses primarily on topics related to sexuality, behavior, and technology, as well as LGBTQ health, identity, and policy. Other key areas of interest include gender, feminism, and media, gender roles and identity studies, racial and ethnic identity research, reproductive health and technologies, and gender diversity and inequality.

Todd G. Morrison has published research in a number of academic venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Psychology and Sexuality
  • The Journal of Sex Research
  • Sexuality & Culture
  • SAGE Open
  • PsycTESTS Dataset

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Morrison include:

  • Intersectional Microaggressions and Social Support for LGBTQ Persons of Color: A Systematic Review of the Canadian-Based Empirical Literature, 2020, Journal of GLBT Family Studies
  • Adolescent Suicide Ideation, Depression and Self-Esteem: Relationships to a New Measure of Gender Role Conflict, 2020, Frontiers in Psychology
  • 'Newsworthy enough?': media framing of Canadian LGBTQ persons' sexual violence experiences, 2020, Psychology and Sexuality
  • Accurately Assessing Gay Men's Erectile Functioning: A Critique of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) Use with Gay Men, 2020, The Journal of Sex Research
  • Development of the nonbinary gender microaggressions (NBGM) scale, 2022, International Journal of Transgender Health

Collaborative work plays a significant role in Morrison's research output. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Melanie A. Morrison
  • Terri A. Croteau
  • Bidushy Sadika
  • Mark Kiss
  • Joshua W. Katz

Best Publications

  • Development and validation of a scale measuring modern prejudice toward gay men and lesbian women.

    Melanie A Morrison;Todd G Morrison

  • Does body satisfaction differ between gay men and lesbian women and heterosexual men and women? A meta-analytic review.

    Melanie A Morrison;Todd G Morrison;Cheryl-Lee Sager

  • Short-form measures of diabetes-related emotional distress: the Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale (PAID)-5 and PAID-1.

    B.E. McGuire;T.G. Morrison;N. Hermanns;S. Skovlund

  • Body-image evaluation and body-image investment among adolescents: a test of sociocultural and social comparison theories.

    Todd G. Morrison;Rudolf Kalin;Melanie A. Morrison

  • Validation of the chronic pain acceptance questionnaire (CPAQ) in an Internet sample and development and preliminary validation of the CPAQ-8.

    Rosemary A. Fish;Brian McGuire;Michael Hogan;Todd G. Morrison

  • Striving for bodily perfection? An exploration of the drive for muscularity in Canadian men.

    Todd G. Morrison;Melanie A. Morrison;Christine Hopkins

  • A Comparison of Situational and Dispositional Predictors of Perceptions of Organizational Politics

    Wendy E. O'connor;Todd G. Morrison

  • Psychometric properties of a scale measuring negative attitudes toward overweight individuals.

    Todd G. Morrison;Wendy E. O'connor

  • The psychometric properties of the Homonegativity Scale.

    Todd G. Morrison;Amanda V. Parriag;Melanie A. Morrison

  • Modern and Old-fashioned Homonegativity Among Samples of Canadian and American University Students

    Melanie A. Morrison;Todd G. Morrison;Randall Franklin

  • Sexual Orientation Bias Toward Gay Men and Lesbian Women: Modern Homonegative Attitudes and Their Association With Discriminatory Behavioral Intentions1

    Melanie A. Morrison;Todd G. Morrison

  • Modern prejudice toward gay men and lesbian women: assessing the viability of a measure of modern homonegative attitudes within an Irish context.

    Todd G Morrison;Paula Kenny;Aoife Harrington

  • Muscle Mania: Development of a New Scale Examining the Drive for Muscularity in Canadian Males

    Todd G. Morrison;Melanie A. Morrison;Christine Hopkins;E. Tyler Rowan

  • A Meta-Analytic Assessment of the Predictive Validity of the Quantitative and Verbal Components of the Graduate Record Examination with Graduate Grade Point Average Representing the Criterion of Graduate Success

    Todd Morrison;Melanie Morrison

  • Correlates of Exposure to Sexually Explicit Material among Canadian Post-Secondary Students

    Todd G. Morrison;Anomi Bearden;Rebecca Harriman;Melanie A. Morrison

  • Psychometric properties of the Revised Male Body Attitudes Scale among Irish men.

    Travis A. Ryan;Todd G. Morrison;Sarah Roddy;Jessica McCutcheon

  • Exposure to Sexually Explicit Material and Variations in Body Esteem, Genital Attitudes, and Sexual Esteem among a Sample of Canadian Men:

    Todd G. Morrison;Shannon R. Ellis;Melanie A. Morrison;Anomi Bearden

  • A comparison of polyamorous and monoamorous persons: are there differences in indices of relationship well-being and sociosexuality?

    Todd Graham Morrison;Dylan Beaulieu;Melanie Brockman;Cormac Ó Beaglaoich

  • Willing and able: a closer look at pain Willingness and Activity Engagement on the Chronic Pain Acceptance Questionnaire (CPAQ-8).

    Rosemary A. Fish;Michael J. Hogan;Todd G. Morrison;Ian Stewart

  • Intersectional Microaggressions and Social Support for LGBTQ Persons of Color: A Systematic Review of the Canadian-Based Empirical Literature

    Bidushy Sadika;Emily Wiebe;Melanie A. Morrison;Todd G. Morrison

  • Correlates of Genital Perceptions among Canadian Post-Secondary Students

    Todd G. Morrison;Anomi Bearden;Shannon R. Ellis;Rebecca Harriman

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian E. McGuire
Brian E. McGuire University of Galway
David Tod
David Tod Lancaster University
Bruno D. Zumbo
Bruno D. Zumbo University of British Columbia
David R. Matthews
David R. Matthews University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in applying your psychology studies to a hands-on career, there are many online degrees and certification routes to consider. Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT) is a popular path, offering online programs that equip students with critical counseling skills. However, requirements for becoming an MFT vary by state, so it’s important to check guidelines specific to your location.

For example, see how to become an mft in Bakersfield for details on education, supervised clinical hours, and licensure in California. Those exploring MFT careers on the East Coast should review Baltimore mft certification requirements to understand Maryland’s standards. Meanwhile, Boise mft certification requirements provide insight into the process in Idaho. Aspiring therapists in Massachusetts can learn about Boston mft certification requirements, which outline local expectations for education and experience.

Online degrees in psychology or counseling make it more flexible than ever to start a fulfilling career in mental health. Just remember to research the qualifications required in your target state to ensure your degree and clinical hours will be recognized for licensure.

Best Scientists Citing Todd G. Morrison

Trending Scientists