World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bente Træen

Bente Træen

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 37 9286 85 135 4326

Bente Træen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bente Træen between 1986 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bente Træen published across 40 years, from 1986 to 2025, averaging 3.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2021. 3 of the 146 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2021. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 2 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 13 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication
1986 2025

146 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bente Træen: publications per year, 1986 to 2025
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 1
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 3
1993 1
1994 1
1995 0
1996 2
1997 0
1998 4
1999 1
2000 2
2001 0
2002 2
2003 2
2004 2
2005 1
2006 2
2007 5
2008 10
2009 3
2010 4
2011 3
2012 2
2013 13
2014 8
2015 7
2016 9
2017 2
2018 6
2019 9
2020 13
2021 14
2022 8
2023 2
2024 2
2025 1
Total 146
Download as CSV

Bente Træen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bente Træen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 135 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 135
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Bente Træen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bente Træen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 37
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Bente Træen was affiliated with the University of Oslo in Norway. Their research primarily focused on sexuality, behavior, and health across various populations and contexts. Their work spanned interdisciplinary fields including psychology, medicine, and social sciences, with a noteworthy concentration in clinical psychology, psychiatry and mental health, social psychology, sociology and political science, and general health professions.

The scientist contributed to the understanding of sexual function and dysfunction, adolescent sexual and reproductive health, LGBTQ health, identity, and policy, as well as social aspects such as sex work and relationships. Their research topics included:

  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health
  • LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
  • Sex work and related issues
  • Marriage and Sexual Relationships
  • Gender, Feminism, and Media

Bente Træen published extensively in academic venues with multiple contributions to the International Journal of Sexual Health and Sexuality & Culture, each featuring seven publications. Additional frequent publication venues included The Journal of Sex Research (five publications), Archives of Sexual Behavior (four publications), and the European Journal of Ageing (two publications).

The scientist collaborated regularly with a number of coauthors, including:

  • Nantje Fischer
  • Ingela Lundin Kvalem
  • Gert Martin Hald
  • Aleksandar Štulhofer
  • Cynthia A. Graham

Significant papers authored by the scientist or with their involvement include:

  • Sexual well-being is part of aging well, 2020, European Journal of Ageing
  • Barriers and Facilitating Factors in Help-Seeking: A Qualitative Study on How Older Adults Experience Talking about Sexual Issues With Healthcare Personnel, 2020, International Journal of Sexual Health
  • Prevalence and Predictors of Sexual Difficulties and Associated Distress Among Partnered, Sexually Active Older Women in Norway, Denmark, Belgium, and Portugal, 2020, Archives of Sexual Behavior
  • A Seemingly Paradoxical Relationship Between Masturbation Frequency and Sexual Satisfaction, 2022, Archives of Sexual Behavior
  • Prevalence of Masturbation and Associated Factors Among Older Adults in Four European Countries, 2021, Archives of Sexual Behavior

Best Publications

  • Use of pornography in traditional media and on the internet in Norway

    Bente Traeen;Toril Sørheim Nilson

  • Use of Pornography in a Random Sample of Norwegian Heterosexual Couples

    Kristian Daneback;Bente Træen;Sven-Axel Månsson

  • Attitudes and use of pornography in the Norwegian population 2002.

    Bente Traeen;Kristin Spitznogle;Alexandra Beverfjord

  • Sexual Activity and Sexual Satisfaction Among Older Adults in Four European Countries.

    Bente Træen;Aleksandar Štulhofer;Erick Janssen;Ana Alexandra Carvalheira

  • Masturbation and Pornography Use Among Coupled Heterosexual Men With Decreased Sexual Desire: How Many Roles of Masturbation?

    Ana Alexandra Carvalheira;Bente Traeen;Aleksandar Stulhofer

  • Sexuality in Older Adults (65+)—An Overview of the Literature, Part 1: Sexual Function and its Difficulties

    Bente Traeen;Gert Martin Hald;Cynthia A. Graham;Paul Enzlin

  • Sexuality in Older Adults (65+)—An Overview of The Recent Literature, Part 2: Body Image and Sexual Satisfaction

    Bente Træen;Ana Carvalheira;Ingela Lundin Kvalem;Aleksandar Štulhofer

  • Sexual problems in 18-67-year-old Norwegians

    Bente Træen;Hein Stigum

  • The use of pornography and sexual behaviour among Norwegian men and women of differing sexual orientation

    B. Træen;K. Daneback

  • Self-perceived effects of Internet pornography use, genital appearance satisfaction, and sexual self-esteem among young Scandinavian adults

    Ingela Lundin Kvalem;Bente Træen;Bo Lewin;Aleksandar Štulhofer

  • Parallel sexual relationships in the Norwegian context

    Bente Træen;Hein Stigum

  • The Effects of Gay Sexually Explicit Media on the HIV Risk Behavior of Men Who Have Sex with Men

    B. R. Simon Rosser;Derek J. Smolenski;Darin Erickson;Alex Iantaffi

  • Correlates of Men's Sexual Interest: A Cross‐Cultural Study

    Ana Alexandra Carvalheira;Bente Traeen;Aleksandar Stulhofer

  • Sex under the influence of alcohol among Norwegian adolescents

    Traeen B;Kvalem Il

  • Sexual socialization and motives for intercourse among Norwegian adolescents.

    Bente Træen;Ingela Lundin Kvalem

  • Extradyadic Sexual Relationships in Norway

    Bente Træen;Kirsti Holmen;Hein Stigum

  • Attitudes Towards Sexuality in Older Men and Women Across Europe: Similarities, Differences, and Associations with Their Sex Lives

    Bente Træen;Ana Alexandra Carvalheira;Gert Martin Hald;Theis Lange;Theis Lange

  • Use of birth control pills and condoms among 17-19-year-old adolescents in Norway: contraceptive versus protective behaviour?

    B Traeen;B Lewin;J M Sundet

  • Casual sex among Norwegian adolescents.

    Bente Træen;Bo Lewin

  • Young and Sexual in Norway and Croatia: Revisiting the Scandinavian Versus Mediterranean Gendered Pattern of Sexual Initiation

    Bente Træen;Aleksandar Štulhofer;Ivan Landripet

  • The relationship between use of sexually explicit media and sexual risk behavior in men who have sex with men: exploring the mediating effects of sexual self-esteem and condom use self-efficacy.

    Bente Træen;Gert Martin Hald;Syed W. Noor;Alex Iantaffi

Frequent Co-Authors

Aleksandar Štulhofer
Aleksandar Štulhofer University of Zagreb
Cynthia A. Graham
Cynthia A. Graham University of Southampton
Erick Janssen
Erick Janssen KU Leuven
B. R. Simon Rosser
B. R. Simon Rosser University of Minnesota
Darin J. Erickson
Darin J. Erickson University of Minnesota
Keith J. Horvath
Keith J. Horvath San Diego State University
Monica Martinussen
Monica Martinussen University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway
Jan H. Rosenvinge
Jan H. Rosenvinge University of Tromsø - The Arctic University of Norway
Ingeborg Rossow
Ingeborg Rossow Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Derek J. Smolenski
Derek J. Smolenski Defense Health Agency

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a psychology degree in the USA offers a wide array of online study options and future career pathways, including specialized fields like marriage and family therapy. Many students pursue online Bachelor’s or Master’s degrees in psychology to build foundational knowledge, and then select a specialization that fits their interests.

Becoming a licensed therapist requires completing specific Stockton mft certification requirements or meeting the Tampa mft certification requirements. While core coursework often shares similarities nationwide, each state and city may have unique rules for clinical hours, supervised training, and exams.

Those interested in how to become a marriage and family therapist in Toledo or want to practice in other locations should review local guidelines, as requirements and job opportunities can vary. For more detailed information, see how to become a marriage and family therapist in Toledo and how to become a marriage and family therapist in Tucson. Learning about these pathways can help you plan your education and career goals more effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Bente Træen

Recently Published Articles