World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
64
Citations
26230
World Ranking
2902
National Ranking
148

Jochen Peter publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jochen Peter sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 181 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Jochen Peter D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jochen Peter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jochen Peter is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands and has a research portfolio spanning psychology, social sciences, and computer science. Their work primarily focuses on social robot interaction and human-robot interaction (HRI), with additional interests in artificial intelligence, child development, education, and the ethical and social impacts of AI technologies.

Their recent papers include:

  • "Can social robots affect children's prosocial behavior? An experimental study on prosocial robot models," 2021, published in Computers in Human Behavior
  • "Anthropomorphism in human-robot interactions: a multidimensional conceptualization," 2022, published in Communication Theory
  • "Closeness, trust, and perceived social support in child-robot relationship formation," 2020, published in Interaction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems
  • "Transparency about a Robot's Lack of Human Psychological Capacities," 2020, published in ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
  • "On sharing and caring: Investigating the effects of a robot's self-disclosure and question-asking on children's robot perceptions and child-robot relationship formation," 2021, published in Computers in Human Behavior

Jochen Peter has collaborated frequently with several researchers in their field. Notable coauthors include Rinaldo Kühne, Àlex Barco, Caroline L. van Straten, Chiara de Jong, and Navya N. Sharan.

Their publishing presence is notable in several academic venues, with the most frequent including:

  • Computers in Human Behavior
  • International Journal of Social Robotics
  • ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction
  • International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
  • International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Their main fields of study are psychology, social sciences, and computer science. Within these, they have contributed extensively to subfields such as social psychology, artificial intelligence, developmental and educational psychology, education, and sociology and political science.

Jochen Peter's research topics center around:

  • Social Robot Interaction and HRI
  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Human-Animal Interaction Studies

Best Publications

  • Friend networking sites and their relationship to adolescents' well-being and social self-esteem.

    Patti M. Valkenburg;Jochen Peter;Alexander P. Schouten

  • Development and validation of a game addiction scale for adolescents

    Jeroen S. Lemmens;Patti M. Valkenburg;Jochen Peter

  • Online communication among adolescents: an integrated model of its attraction, opportunities, and risks.

    Patti M. Valkenburg;Jochen Peter

  • Social Consequences of the Internet for Adolescents: A Decade of Research

    Patti M. Valkenburg;Jochen Peter

  • The Differential Susceptibility to Media Effects Model

    Patti M. Valkenburg;Jochen Peter

  • Preadolescents' and adolescents' online communication and their closeness to friends

    Patti M. Valkenburg;Jochen Peter

  • Online Communication and Adolescent Well-Being: Testing the Stimulation versus the Displacement Hypothesis

    Patti M. Valkenburg;Jochen Peter

  • Framing Politics at the Launch of the Euro: A Cross-National Comparative Study of Frames in the News

    Claes H. De Vreese;Jochen Peter;Holli A. Semetko

  • Adolescents’ identity experiments on the internet

    Patti M. Valkenburg;Alexander P. Schouten;Jochen Peter

  • Psychosocial causes and consequences of pathological gaming

    Jeroen S. Lemmens;Patti M. Valkenburg;Jochen Peter

  • Norms of online expressions of emotion: Comparing Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and WhatsApp:

    Sophie F Waterloo;Susanne E Baumgartner;Jochen Peter;Patti M Valkenburg

  • Adolescents and Pornography: A Review of 20 Years of Research

    Jochen Peter;Patti M. Valkenburg

  • Developing a model of adolescent friendship formation on the internet.

    Jochen Peter;Patti M. Valkenburg;Alexander P. Schouten

  • Media Effects: Theory and Research.

    Patti M. Valkenburg;Jochen Peter;Joseph Bart Walther

  • Adolescents’ Exposure to Sexually Explicit Material on the Internet

    Jochen Peter;Patti M. Valkenburg

  • Adolescents' Identity Experiments on the Internet Consequences for Social Competence and Self-Concept Unity

    Patti M. Valkenburg;Jochen Peter

  • Precursors and Underlying Processes of Adolescents' Online Self-Disclosure: Developing and Testing an “Internet-Attribute-Perception” Model

    Alexander P. Schouten;Patti M. Valkenburg;Jochen Peter

  • Adolescents’ Exposure to a Sexualized Media Environment and Their Notions of Women as Sex Objects

    Jochen Peter;Patti M. Valkenburg

  • Getting acquainted through social network sites: Testing a model of online uncertainty reduction and social attraction

    Marjolijn L. Antheunis;Patti M. Valkenburg;Jochen Peter

  • Adolescents’ internet use: Testing the “disappearing digital divide” versus the “emerging digital differentiation” approach

    Jochen Peter;Patti M. Valkenburg

  • Development and Validation of a Game Addiction Scale

    Jeroen S Lemmens;Patti M. Valkenburg;Jochen Peter

Frequent Co-Authors

Patti M. Valkenburg
Patti M. Valkenburg University of Amsterdam
Holli A. Semetko
Holli A. Semetko Emory University
Claes H. de Vreese
Claes H. de Vreese University of Amsterdam
Sonia Livingstone
Sonia Livingstone London School of Economics and Political Science
Anna E. Goudriaan
Anna E. Goudriaan University of Amsterdam
Joseph B. Walther
Joseph B. Walther University of California, Santa Barbara
Gerbert Kraaykamp
Gerbert Kraaykamp Radboud University
Dick J. Veltman
Dick J. Veltman Amsterdam UMC
Susan Banducci
Susan Banducci University of Exeter

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As the demand for mental health professionals continues to grow, students interested in Psychology have a range of online degree options and career pathways to consider. Online counseling and psychology programs are designed to provide flexibility, allowing students to balance their studies with work or personal commitments.

Affordability is a key consideration for many prospective students. For those seeking the most economical options, exploring the affordable counseling degrees in Florida can be a great start. Similarly, students interested in studying in neighboring states can investigate the cheapest counseling programs in Georgia, or compare offerings with the cheapest counseling programs in Illinois.

For those located in the Midwest, there are also cheapest counseling degrees in Indiana which offer quality education at an accessible price point. Regardless of location, choosing an accredited program is essential for future licensure and employment opportunities within the counseling and psychology fields.

Best Scientists Citing Jochen Peter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles