World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Regina J. J. M. van den Eijnden

Regina J. J. M. van den Eijnden

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 54 4555 4215 217 208 152 12401

Regina J. J. M. van den Eijnden publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Regina J. J. M. van den Eijnden between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Regina J. J. M. van den Eijnden published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2014. 21 of the 180 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2014. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 11 publications
1994 2025

180 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Regina J. J. M. van den Eijnden: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 2
1999 0
2000 1
2001 1
2002 4
2003 3
2004 2
2005 4
2006 8
2007 11
2008 7
2009 9
2010 4
2011 5
2012 9
2013 7
2014 13
2015 9
2016 12
2017 8
2018 5
2019 4
2020 5
2021 10
2022 5
2023 10
2024 10
2025 11
Total 180
Download as CSV

Regina J. J. M. van den Eijnden publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Regina J. J. M. van den Eijnden sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 152 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 152
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Regina J. J. M. van den Eijnden D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Regina J. J. M. van den Eijnden sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408 54
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Regina J. J. M. van den Eijnden is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on the social sciences, with particular contributions in sociology and political science, education, communication, social psychology, and applied psychology.

Their work extensively explores topics related to technology and its impact on adolescent development and well-being. Key themes covered include:

  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Media Influence and Health
  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Regina van den Eijnden has published multiple papers, with recent examples including:

  • "Adolescents' Intense and Problematic Social Media Use and Their Well-Being in 29 Countries" (2020) in Journal of Adolescent Health
  • "Social Media Use and Cyber-Bullying: A Cross-National Analysis of Young People in 42 Countries" (2020) in Journal of Adolescent Health
  • "Social media use intensity, social media use problems, and mental health among adolescents: Investigating directionality and mediating processes" (2020) in Computers in Human Behavior
  • "Problematic social media use in childhood and adolescence" (2024) in Addictive Behaviors
  • "International perspectives on social media use among adolescents: Implications for mental and social well-being and substance use" (2021) in Computers in Human Behavior

Regina van den Eijnden frequently publishes in several venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • Computers in Human Behavior
  • Journal of Adolescent Health
  • Journal of Behavioral Addictions
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Collaboration is an important aspect of their research. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Ina M. Koning
  • Helen G. M. Vossen
  • Meyran Boniel-Nissim
  • Suzanne M. Geurts
  • Maartje Boer

Best Publications

  • The Compulsive Internet Use Scale (CIUS): Some Psychometric Properties

    G.J. Meerkerk;R.J.J.M. van den Eijnden;A.A. Vermulst;H.F.L. Garretsen

  • The Social Media Disorder Scale

    Regina J.J.M. van den Eijnden;Jeroen S. Lemmens;Patti M. Valkenburg

  • Online communication, compulsive Internet use, and psychosocial well-being among adolescents: a longitudinal study.

    Regina J. J. M. van den Eijnden;Gert-Jan Meerkerk;Ad A. Vermulst;Renske Spijkerman

  • Online video game addiction: identification of addicted adolescent gamers.

    Antonius J. Van Rooij;Tim M. Schoenmakers;Ad A. Vermulst;Regina J.J.M. Van Den Eijnden

  • Compulsive internet use among adolescents: bidirectional parent-child relationships.

    Regina J. J. M. van den Eijnden;Renske Spijkerman;Ad A. Vermulst;Tony J. van Rooij

  • Predicting compulsive Internet use : It's all about sex

    Gert-Jan Meerkerk;Regina J.J.M. Van Den Eijnden;Henk F.L. Garretsen

  • Daily and Compulsive Internet Use and Well-Being in Adolescence: A Diathesis-Stress Model Based on Big Five Personality Traits

    Niels van der Aa;Geertjan Overbeek;Rutger C. M. E. Engels;Ron H. J. Scholte

  • Adolescents' Intense and Problematic Social Media Use and Their Well-Being in 29 Countries.

    Maartje Boer;Regina J.J.M. van den Eijnden;Meyran Boniel-Nissim;Suzy Lai Wong

  • Is compulsive internet use related to sensitivity to reward and punishment, and impulsivity?

    G. J. Meerkerk;R. J. J. M. van den Eijnden;I. H. A. Franken;H. F. L. Garretsen

  • The impact of heavy and disordered use of games and social media on adolescents' psychological, social, and school functioning.

    Regina van den Eijnden;Ina M. Koning;Suzan M. Doornwaard;Femke van Gurp

  • Preventing heavy alcohol use in adolescents (PAS): cluster randomized trial of a parent and student intervention offered separately and simultaneously

    Ina M Koning;Wilma A M Vollebergh;Filip Smit;Jacqueline E E Verdurmen

  • Social media use intensity, social media use problems, and mental health among adolescents: Investigating directionality and mediating processes

    Maartje Boer;Gonneke W.J.M. Stevens;Catrin Finkenauer;Margaretha E. de Looze

  • Explaining adolescents' smoking and drinking behavior: the concept of smoker and drinker prototypes in relation to variables of the theory of planned behavior.

    Renske Spijkerman;Regina J.J.M. van den Eijnden;Salvatore Vitale;Rutger C.M.E. Engels

  • Video game addiction test: validity and psychometric characteristics.

    Antonius J van Rooij;Tim M Schoenmakers;Regina J J M van den Eijnden;Ad A Vermulst

  • Socioeconomic Differences in Alcohol-Specific Parenting Practices and Adolescents’ Drinking Patterns

    Renske Spijkerman;Regina J.J.M. van den Eijnden;Annemarie Huiberts

  • Narcissistic adolescents' attention-seeking following social rejection: Links with social media disclosure, problematic social media use, and smartphone stress

    Skyler T. Hawk;Regina J.J.M. van den Eijnden;Caspar J. van Lissa;Tom F.M. ter Bogt

  • An Introduction to Deviance-Regulation Theory: The Effect of Behavioral Norms on Message Framing:

    Hart Blanton;Anne E. Stuart;Regina J.J.M. Van den Eijnden

  • The Bidirectional Relationships Between Online Victimization and Psychosocial Problems in Adolescents: A Comparison with Real-Life Victimization

    Regina van den Eijnden;Ad Vermulst;Antonius J. van Rooij;Ron H. J. Scholte

  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder-Symptoms, Social Media Use Intensity, and Social Media Use Problems in Adolescents: Investigating Directionality.

    Maartje Boer;Gonneke Stevens;Catrin Finkenauer;Regina van den Eijnden

  • A Longitudinal Test of the Theory of Planned Behavior Predicting Smoking Onset among Asthmatic and Non-asthmatic Adolescents

    Monique O. M. Van De Ven;Rutger C. M. E. Engels;Roy Otten;Regina J. J. M. Van Den Eijnden

Frequent Co-Authors

Rutger C. M. E. Engels
Rutger C. M. E. Engels Erasmus University Rotterdam
Tom F. M. ter Bogt
Tom F. M. ter Bogt Utrecht University
Wilma A. M. Vollebergh
Wilma A. M. Vollebergh Utrecht University
Dike van de Mheen
Dike van de Mheen Maastricht University
Ine Vanwesenbeeck
Ine Vanwesenbeeck Utrecht University
Marloes Kleinjan
Marloes Kleinjan Utrecht University
Ad A. Vermulst
Ad A. Vermulst Radboud University
Roy Otten
Roy Otten Radboud University
Johannes Brug
Johannes Brug Utrecht University
Geertjan Overbeek
Geertjan Overbeek University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens up diverse career opportunities, especially in the field of school counseling across the USA. While many psychology graduates become licensed psychologists or counselors, an increasing number are choosing specialized pathways, such as school counseling, that require additional certification and training.

Requirements to become a school counselor can vary significantly from state to state. For example, becoming a school counselor in South Dakota requires specific graduate education and practical experience, while the Tennessee school counselor certification requirements include passing designated examinations and completing an approved preparation program.

Prospective counselors in Texas must follow the Texas school counselor certification requirements, which emphasize graduate coursework and professional certifications. Similarly, the Utah school counselor education requirements focus on both academic preparation and hands-on field experience.

Students interested in these career pathways should explore accredited online Psychology or Counseling degrees, as these programs can offer the flexibility needed to meet varied state requirements. Always verify state-specific guidelines before enrolling to ensure your education aligns with your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Regina J. J. M. van den Eijnden

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles