World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 56 4257 3936 205 196 212 9752

Geertjan Overbeek publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Geertjan Overbeek between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Geertjan Overbeek published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 9.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2015. 21 of the 238 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2015. 2001: 2 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 6 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 9 publications
2001 2025

238 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Geertjan Overbeek: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 2
2002 0
2003 3
2004 4
2005 3
2006 9
2007 11
2008 1
2009 6
2010 15
2011 10
2012 16
2013 7
2014 16
2015 20
2016 7
2017 15
2018 14
2019 13
2020 12
2021 14
2022 13
2023 6
2024 12
2025 9
Total 238
Download as CSV

Geertjan Overbeek publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geertjan Overbeek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 212 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313 212
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Geertjan Overbeek D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geertjan Overbeek sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56–57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345 56
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Geertjan Overbeek is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands, where the research primarily focuses on developmental psychology and social sciences. The work encompasses a broad range of topics related to child development, psychosocial factors, and educational outcomes, reflecting a comprehensive approach toward understanding behavioral and social dynamics in childhood and adolescence.

Their research fields include:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

Within these broader categories, their subfields of study cover:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Education
  • Social Psychology
  • Safety Research
  • Sociology and Political Science

Geertjan Overbeek's main research topics include:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions

The recent publication record highlights significant contributions across multiple journals, with some of the latest papers being:

  • Effective Components of Social Skills Training Programs for Children and Adolescents in Nonclinical Samples: A Multilevel Meta-analysis (2020), published in Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
  • Development and socialization of self-regulation from infancy to adolescence: A meta-review differentiating between self-regulatory abilities, goals, and motivation (2023), published in Developmental Review
  • What Works for Whom in School-Based Anti-bullying Interventions? An Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis (2022), published in Prevention Science
  • Manifesto for new directions in developmental science (2020), published in New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development
  • Social goals and gains of adolescent bullying and aggression: A meta-analysis (2023), published in Developmental Review

Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • Journal of Family Psychology
  • Prevention Science
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Developmental Review

Collaborations are notable with several co-authors, including:

  • Patty Leijten
  • Alithe L. van den Akker
  • Eddie Brummelman
  • Brechtje de Mooij
  • Nicole Creasey

Best Publications

  • Daily and Compulsive Internet Use and Well-Being in Adolescence: A Diathesis-Stress Model Based on Big Five Personality Traits

    Niels van der Aa;Geertjan Overbeek;Rutger C. M. E. Engels;Ron H. J. Scholte

  • Origins of narcissism in children

    Eddie Brummelman;Eddie Brummelman;Sander Thomaes;Sander Thomaes;Stefanie A. Nelemans;Bram Orobio de Castro

  • Stability in bullying and victimization and its association with social adjustment in childhood and adolescence.

    Ron H. J. Scholte;Rutger C. M. E. Engels;Geertjan Overbeek;Raymond A. T. de Kemp

  • Bullying and Victimization Among Adolescents: The Role of Ethnicity and Ethnic Composition of School Class

    Miranda H. M. Vervoort;Ron H. J. Scholte;Geertjan Overbeek

  • Meta-Analyses: Key Parenting Program Components for Disruptive Child Behavior

    Patty Leijten;Patty Leijten;Frances Gardner;G.J. Melendez-Torres;Jolien van Aar

  • Longitudinal associations of marital quality and marital dissolution with the incidence of DSM-III-R disorders.

    Geertjan Overbeek;Wilma Vollebergh;Ron de Graaf;Ron Scholte

  • What it takes to forgive: When and why executive functioning facilitates forgiveness.

    Tila M. Pronk;Johan C. Karremans;Geertjan Overbeek;Ad A. Vermulst

  • Parent-child relationship trajectories during adolescence: Longitudinal associations with romantic outcomes in emerging adulthood

    Inge Seiffge-Krenke;Geertjan Overbeek;Ad Vermulst

  • Substance use risk profiles and associations with early substance use in adolescence

    Monique Malmberg;Geertjan Overbeek;Karin Monshouwer;Jeroen Lammers

  • Sustained, fade-out or sleeper effects? A systematic review and meta-analysis of parenting interventions for disruptive child behavior

    Jolien van Aar;Patty Leijten;Patty Leijten;Bram Orobio de Castro;Geertjan Overbeek

  • Early Adolescent Empathy, Parental Support, and Antisocial Behavior.

    Raymond A T de Kemp;Geertjan Overbeek;Minet de Wied;Rutger C M E Engels

  • Transitions in body and behavior: a meta-analytic study on the relationship between pubertal development and adolescent sexual behavior

    Laura Baams;Judith Semon Dubas;Geertjan Overbeek;Marcel A.G. van Aken

  • Early adolescent delinquency: the role of parents and best friends

    Raymond A. T. de Kemp;Ron H. J. Scholte;Geertjan Overbeek;Rutger C. M. E. Engels

  • Parent-child relationships, partner relationships, and emotional adjustment: a birth-to-maturity prospective study.

    Geertjan Overbeek;Håkan Stattin;Ad Vermulst;Thao Ha

  • Drinking Motives, Alcohol Expectancies, Self-Efficacy, and Drinking Patterns

    Rutger C M E Engels;Reinout Wiers;Lex Lemmers;Geert Jan Overbeek

  • On feeding those hungry for praise: person praise backfires in children with low self-esteem

    Eddie Brummelman;Sander Thomaes;Geertjan Overbeek;Bram Orobio De Castro

  • Course, Co-Occurrence, and Longitudinal Associations of Emotional Disturbance and Delinquency From Adolescence to Young Adulthood: A Six-Year Three-Wave Study

    Geertjan Overbeek;Wilma Vollebergh;Wim Meeus;Rutger Engels

  • Parents and partners in crime: a six-year longitudinal study on changes in supportive relationships and delinquency in adolescence and young adulthood.

    W.H.J. Meeus;S.J.T. Branje;G.J. Overbeek

  • Underlying Mechanisms of Gene-Environment Interactions in Externalizing Behavior: A Systematic Review and Search for Theoretical Mechanisms.

    Joyce Weeland;Joyce Weeland;Geertjan Overbeek;Bram Orobio de Castro;Walter Matthys

Frequent Co-Authors

Rutger C. M. E. Engels
Rutger C. M. E. Engels Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ron H. J. Scholte
Ron H. J. Scholte Radboud University
Bram Orobio de Castro
Bram Orobio de Castro Utrecht University
Ad A. Vermulst
Ad A. Vermulst Radboud University
Judith Semon Dubas
Judith Semon Dubas Utrecht University
Marcel A. G. van Aken
Marcel A. G. van Aken Utrecht University
Walter Matthys
Walter Matthys Utrecht University
Wilma A. M. Vollebergh
Wilma A. M. Vollebergh Utrecht University
Sander Thomaes
Sander Thomaes Utrecht University
Wim Meeus
Wim Meeus Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens doors to diverse career paths. Students can pursue cognitive psychology career options, such as research roles, human factors specialists, or user experience analysts. These fields demand strong analytical skills and a firm understanding of how the human mind works.

Graduates interested in direct support roles might consider jobs in counseling psychology. Positions such as school counselors, addiction counselors, and mental health counselors are in demand and allow professionals to work closely with individuals seeking guidance.

When choosing a pathway, it’s important to understand the difference between counselor and psychologist roles. Psychologists typically require higher-level degrees and are qualified to diagnose and treat mental disorders, while counselors focus on helping clients navigate personal challenges.

For those interested in job security, learning about what type of psychologist is most in demand can help guide specialty selection. Areas such as industrial-organizational psychology, clinical psychology, and school psychology are experiencing growth, offering strong opportunities for graduates.

Best Scientists Citing Geertjan Overbeek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles