World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
56
Citations
9752
World Ranking
4257
National Ranking
205

Geertjan Overbeek publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geertjan Overbeek sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 212 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Geertjan Overbeek D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Geertjan Overbeek sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Geertjan Overbeek is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands, where the research primarily focuses on developmental psychology and social sciences. The work encompasses a broad range of topics related to child development, psychosocial factors, and educational outcomes, reflecting a comprehensive approach toward understanding behavioral and social dynamics in childhood and adolescence.

Their research fields include:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

Within these broader categories, their subfields of study cover:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Education
  • Social Psychology
  • Safety Research
  • Sociology and Political Science

Geertjan Overbeek's main research topics include:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions

The recent publication record highlights significant contributions across multiple journals, with some of the latest papers being:

  • Effective Components of Social Skills Training Programs for Children and Adolescents in Nonclinical Samples: A Multilevel Meta-analysis (2020), published in Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review
  • Development and socialization of self-regulation from infancy to adolescence: A meta-review differentiating between self-regulatory abilities, goals, and motivation (2023), published in Developmental Review
  • What Works for Whom in School-Based Anti-bullying Interventions? An Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis (2022), published in Prevention Science
  • Manifesto for new directions in developmental science (2020), published in New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development
  • Social goals and gains of adolescent bullying and aggression: A meta-analysis (2023), published in Developmental Review

Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • Journal of Family Psychology
  • Prevention Science
  • Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Developmental Review

Collaborations are notable with several co-authors, including:

  • Patty Leijten
  • Alithe L. van den Akker
  • Eddie Brummelman
  • Brechtje de Mooij
  • Nicole Creasey

Best Publications

  • Daily and Compulsive Internet Use and Well-Being in Adolescence: A Diathesis-Stress Model Based on Big Five Personality Traits

    Niels van der Aa;Geertjan Overbeek;Rutger C. M. E. Engels;Ron H. J. Scholte

  • Origins of narcissism in children

    Eddie Brummelman;Eddie Brummelman;Sander Thomaes;Sander Thomaes;Stefanie A. Nelemans;Bram Orobio de Castro

  • Stability in bullying and victimization and its association with social adjustment in childhood and adolescence.

    Ron H. J. Scholte;Rutger C. M. E. Engels;Geertjan Overbeek;Raymond A. T. de Kemp

  • Bullying and Victimization Among Adolescents: The Role of Ethnicity and Ethnic Composition of School Class

    Miranda H. M. Vervoort;Ron H. J. Scholte;Geertjan Overbeek

  • Meta-Analyses: Key Parenting Program Components for Disruptive Child Behavior

    Patty Leijten;Patty Leijten;Frances Gardner;G.J. Melendez-Torres;Jolien van Aar

  • Longitudinal associations of marital quality and marital dissolution with the incidence of DSM-III-R disorders.

    Geertjan Overbeek;Wilma Vollebergh;Ron de Graaf;Ron Scholte

  • What it takes to forgive: When and why executive functioning facilitates forgiveness.

    Tila M. Pronk;Johan C. Karremans;Geertjan Overbeek;Ad A. Vermulst

  • Parent-child relationship trajectories during adolescence: Longitudinal associations with romantic outcomes in emerging adulthood

    Inge Seiffge-Krenke;Geertjan Overbeek;Ad Vermulst

  • Substance use risk profiles and associations with early substance use in adolescence

    Monique Malmberg;Geertjan Overbeek;Karin Monshouwer;Jeroen Lammers

  • Sustained, fade-out or sleeper effects? A systematic review and meta-analysis of parenting interventions for disruptive child behavior

    Jolien van Aar;Patty Leijten;Patty Leijten;Bram Orobio de Castro;Geertjan Overbeek

  • Early Adolescent Empathy, Parental Support, and Antisocial Behavior.

    Raymond A T de Kemp;Geertjan Overbeek;Minet de Wied;Rutger C M E Engels

  • Parenting in times of war: A meta-analysis and qualitative synthesis of war-exposure, parenting, and child adjustment

    Hend Eltanamly;Patty Leijten;Suzanne Jak;Geertjan Overbeek

  • Transitions in body and behavior: a meta-analytic study on the relationship between pubertal development and adolescent sexual behavior

    Laura Baams;Judith Semon Dubas;Geertjan Overbeek;Marcel A.G. van Aken

  • Early adolescent delinquency: the role of parents and best friends

    Raymond A. T. de Kemp;Ron H. J. Scholte;Geertjan Overbeek;Rutger C. M. E. Engels

  • Parent-child relationships, partner relationships, and emotional adjustment: a birth-to-maturity prospective study.

    Geertjan Overbeek;Håkan Stattin;Ad Vermulst;Thao Ha

  • Drinking Motives, Alcohol Expectancies, Self-Efficacy, and Drinking Patterns

    Rutger C M E Engels;Reinout Wiers;Lex Lemmers;Geert Jan Overbeek

  • On feeding those hungry for praise: person praise backfires in children with low self-esteem

    Eddie Brummelman;Sander Thomaes;Geertjan Overbeek;Bram Orobio De Castro

  • Course, Co-Occurrence, and Longitudinal Associations of Emotional Disturbance and Delinquency From Adolescence to Young Adulthood: A Six-Year Three-Wave Study

    Geertjan Overbeek;Wilma Vollebergh;Wim Meeus;Rutger Engels

  • Parents and partners in crime: a six-year longitudinal study on changes in supportive relationships and delinquency in adolescence and young adulthood.

    W.H.J. Meeus;S.J.T. Branje;G.J. Overbeek

  • Underlying Mechanisms of Gene-Environment Interactions in Externalizing Behavior: A Systematic Review and Search for Theoretical Mechanisms.

    Joyce Weeland;Joyce Weeland;Geertjan Overbeek;Bram Orobio de Castro;Walter Matthys

Frequent Co-Authors

Rutger C. M. E. Engels
Rutger C. M. E. Engels Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ron H. J. Scholte
Ron H. J. Scholte Radboud University
Bram Orobio de Castro
Bram Orobio de Castro Utrecht University
Ad A. Vermulst
Ad A. Vermulst Radboud University
Judith Semon Dubas
Judith Semon Dubas Utrecht University
Marcel A. G. van Aken
Marcel A. G. van Aken Utrecht University
Walter Matthys
Walter Matthys Utrecht University
Wilma A. M. Vollebergh
Wilma A. M. Vollebergh Utrecht University
Sander Thomaes
Sander Thomaes Utrecht University
Wim Meeus
Wim Meeus Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens doors to diverse career paths. Students can pursue cognitive psychology career options, such as research roles, human factors specialists, or user experience analysts. These fields demand strong analytical skills and a firm understanding of how the human mind works.

Graduates interested in direct support roles might consider jobs in counseling psychology. Positions such as school counselors, addiction counselors, and mental health counselors are in demand and allow professionals to work closely with individuals seeking guidance.

When choosing a pathway, it’s important to understand the difference between counselor and psychologist roles. Psychologists typically require higher-level degrees and are qualified to diagnose and treat mental disorders, while counselors focus on helping clients navigate personal challenges.

For those interested in job security, learning about what type of psychologist is most in demand can help guide specialty selection. Areas such as industrial-organizational psychology, clinical psychology, and school psychology are experiencing growth, offering strong opportunities for graduates.

Best Scientists Citing Geertjan Overbeek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles