World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 70 2276 2076 253 237 190 18644

Frances Gardner publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Frances Gardner between 1958 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Frances Gardner published across 68 years, from 1958 to 2025, averaging 3.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2024. 23 of the 227 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1958 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2024. 1958: 1 publication 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 1 publication 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 2 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 14 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 13 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 7 publications
1958 2025

227 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Frances Gardner: publications per year, 1958 to 2025
Year Publications
1958 1
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 1
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 1
1988 0
1989 1
1990 1
1991 0
1992 1
1993 1
1994 1
1995 0
1996 0
1997 2
1998 0
1999 1
2000 1
2001 0
2002 3
2003 5
2004 1
2005 2
2006 5
2007 7
2008 9
2009 8
2010 3
2011 4
2012 14
2013 10
2014 5
2015 14
2016 12
2017 13
2018 14
2019 15
2020 12
2021 15
2022 8
2023 13
2024 16
2025 7
Total 227
Download as CSV

Frances Gardner publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frances Gardner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 190 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 190
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Frances Gardner D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frances Gardner sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 70 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215 70
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Frances Gardner is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on psychology and social sciences, with significant contributions to clinical psychology, general health professions, education, public health, environmental and occupational health, and safety research.

Their work covers diverse topics including child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, child abuse and trauma, family and disability support research, early childhood education and development, child development and digital technology, maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum, and adolescent sexual and reproductive health.

Frequent publication venues for Gardner include Prevention Science, Child Abuse & Neglect, BMC Public Health, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, and Trials. These journals have published multiple papers by Gardner, highlighting consistent engagement with leading outlets in the field.

Gardner regularly collaborates with several co-authors. Notable frequent collaborators include Jamie M. Lachman, Judy Hutchings, G. J. Meléndez-Torres, Patty Leijten, and Catherine L. Ward.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Gardner include:

  • Parenting interventions to prevent violence against children in low- and middle-income countries in East and Southeast Asia: A systematic review and multi-level meta-analysis, 2020, Child Abuse & Neglect
  • Individual Participant Data Meta-analysis: Impact of Conduct Problem Severity, Comorbid Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and Emotional Problems, and Maternal Depression on Parenting Program Effects, 2020, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
  • Research Review: The most effective parenting program content for disruptive child behavior - a network meta-analysis, 2021, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
  • Research Strategies to Discern Active Psychological Therapy Components: A Scoping Review, 2021, Clinical Psychological Science
  • Combining parenting and economic strengthening programmes to reduce violence against children: a cluster randomised controlled trial with predominantly male caregivers in rural Tanzania, 2020, BMJ Global Health

Best Publications

  • The Family Check-Up With High-Risk Indigent Families: Preventing Problem Behavior by Increasing Parents’ Positive Behavior Support in Early Childhood

    Thomas J. Dishion;Daniel Shaw;Arin Connell;Frances Gardner

  • Standards of Evidence for Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Scale-up Research in Prevention Science: Next Generation.

    Denise C. Gottfredson;Thomas D. Cook;Frances E. M. Gardner;Deborah Gorman-Smith

  • Randomised controlled trial of a parenting intervention in the voluntary sector for reducing child conduct problems: outcomes and mechanisms of change.

    Frances Gardner;Jennifer Burton;Ivana Klimes

  • Parenting intervention in Sure Start services for children at risk of developing conduct disorder: pragmatic randomised controlled trial

    Judy Hutchings;Frances Gardner;Tracey Bywater;Dave Daley

  • Psychological distress amongst AIDS‐orphaned children in urban South Africa

    Lucie Cluver;Frances Gardner;Don Operario

  • Improving positive parenting skills and reducing harsh and abusive parenting in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review.

    Wendy Knerr;Frances Gardner;Lucie Cluver;Lucie Cluver

  • Methodological Issues in the Direct Observation of Parent–Child Interaction: Do Observational Findings Reflect the Natural Behavior of Participants?

    Frances Gardner

  • Randomized trial of a family-centered approach to the prevention of early conduct problems: 2-year effects of the family check-up in early childhood.

    Daniel S. Shaw;Thomas J. Dishion;Lauren Supplee;Frances Gardner

  • Who benefits and how does it work? Moderators and mediators of outcome in an effectiveness trial of a parenting intervention.

    Frances Gardner;Judy Hutchings;Tracey Bywater;Chris Whitaker

  • What are the associations between parenting, callous–unemotional traits, and antisocial behavior in youth? A systematic review of evidence.

    Rebecca Waller;Frances Gardner;Luke W. Hyde

  • The relations among cumulative risk, parenting, and behavior problems during early childhood.

    Christopher J. Trentacosta;Luke W. Hyde;Daniel S. Shaw;Thomas J. Dishion

  • Improvements in maternal depression as a mediator of intervention effects on early childhood problem behavior

    Daniel S. Shaw;Arin Connell;Thomas J. Dishion;Melvin N. Wilson

  • Observational Measures of Parent-Child Interaction: An Introductory Review.

    Helen Aspland;Frances Gardner

  • Transporting Evidence-Based Parenting Programs for Child Problem Behavior (Age 3–10) Between Countries: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Frances Gardner;Paul Montgomery;Wendy Knerr

  • Inconsistent parenting: is there evidence for a link with children's conduct problems?

    Frances E. M. Gardner

  • Risk and protective factors for psychological well-being of children orphaned by AIDS in Cape Town: a qualitative study of children and caregivers' perspectives.

    Cluver L;Gardner F

  • Meta-Analyses: Key Parenting Program Components for Disruptive Child Behavior

    Patty Leijten;Patty Leijten;Frances Gardner;G.J. Melendez-Torres;Jolien van Aar

  • The psychological well-being of children orphaned by AIDS in Cape Town, South Africa

    Lucie Cluver;Frances Gardner

  • Persisting mental health problems among AIDS-orphaned children in South Africa

    Lucie D. Cluver;Mark Orkin;Frances Gardner;Mark E. Boyes

  • Effects of stigma on the mental health of adolescents orphaned by AIDS.

    Lucie D. Cluver;Frances Gardner;Don Operario

Frequent Co-Authors

Lucie Cluver
Lucie Cluver University of Oxford
Daniel S. Shaw
Daniel S. Shaw University of Pittsburgh
Thomas J. Dishion
Thomas J. Dishion Arizona State University
Melvin N. Wilson
Melvin N. Wilson University of Virginia
Judy Hutchings
Judy Hutchings Bangor University
Rebecca Waller
Rebecca Waller University of Pennsylvania
Mark E. Boyes
Mark E. Boyes Curtin University
Stephen Scott
Stephen Scott Queen's University
Sabine Landau
Sabine Landau King's College London
Paul Montgomery
Paul Montgomery University of Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in psychology opens up a variety of career pathways, especially when paired with specialized online or in-person counseling degrees. Students often choose to pursue counseling programs to gain the credentials needed for roles in mental health, school, or career guidance.

Across the United States, there are numerous programs to fit different interests. For those in the Northeast, the best counseling degree programs in Boston are known for their focus on clinical skills and urban mental health. On the West Coast, students can explore the best counseling degree programs in California, which often offer innovative online options and a strong focus on multicultural counseling.

Midwestern students may be interested in the comprehensive Chicago counseling degree programs, featuring diverse practicum opportunities in a metropolitan setting. Those seeking programs in Ohio can review the best college counseling programs in Cincinnati for robust support in community and school counseling.

Whether you choose an online or campus-based pathway, accredited programs across the country can prepare you for dynamic roles in mental health, education, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Frances Gardner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles