World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 37 9223 8620 4886 4450 148 5398

Justin D. Smith publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Justin D. Smith between 1962 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Justin D. Smith published across 65 years, from 1962 to 2026, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 51 publications in 2023. 35 of the 287 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1962 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 51. Peak 51 publications in 2023. 1962: 1 publication 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 1 publication 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 0 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 16 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 51 publications 2024: 40 publications 2025: 34 publications 2026: 1 publication
1962 2026

287 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Justin D. Smith: publications per year, 1962 to 2026
Year Publications
1962 1
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 1
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 1
1999 1
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 1
2005 1
2006 0
2007 1
2008 0
2009 2
2010 5
2011 2
2012 9
2013 6
2014 5
2015 9
2016 9
2017 12
2018 8
2019 16
2020 25
2021 21
2022 23
2023 51
2024 40
2025 34
2026 1
Total 287
Download as CSV

Justin D. Smith publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Justin D. Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 148 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 148
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Justin D. Smith D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Justin D. Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 37
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Justin D. Smith is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States with a research focus primarily in health professions and medicine. Their work spans numerous subfields including general health professions, public health, environmental and occupational health, clinical psychology, pediatrics, perinatology, child health, and economics and econometrics.

Their scientific contributions engage with several main topics such as health policy implementation science, primary care and health outcomes, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, child and adolescent health, mental health and patient involvement, health sciences research and education, and health systems, economic evaluations, and quality of life.

Justin D. Smith has published extensively in several venues, most frequently in:

  • Implementation Science Communications
  • Implementation Science
  • Families Systems & Health
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Prevention Science

Their recent papers reflect a focus on implementation science and health management, including:

  • The Implementation Research Logic Model: a method for planning, executing, reporting, and synthesizing implementation projects (2020, Implementation Science)
  • Prevention and Management of Childhood Obesity and Its Psychological and Health Comorbidities (2020, Annual Review of Clinical Psychology)
  • Reflections on 10 years of effectiveness-implementation hybrid studies (2022, Frontiers in Health Services)
  • Implementation strategies for digital mental health interventions in health care settings (2020, American Psychologist)
  • Network interventions for managing the COVID-19 pandemic and sustaining economy (2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)

Their work involves collaboration with multiple frequent co-authors including:

  • Allison J. Carroll
  • Neil Jordan
  • David Cella
  • James L. Merle
  • Sofia F. Garcia

Best Publications

  • Media and Young Minds

    Jenny Radesky;Dimitri Christakis;David Hill;Nusheen Ameenuddin

  • Single-case experimental designs: a systematic review of published research and current standards.

    Justin D. Smith

  • Coercive family process and early-onset conduct problems from age 2 to school entry.

    Justin D. Smith;Thomas J. Dishion;Daniel S. Shaw;Melvin N. Wilson

  • Implementation strategies for digital mental health interventions in health care settings.

    Andrea K Graham;Emily G Lattie;Byron J Powell;Aaron R Lyon

  • Design and analysis in dissemination and implementation research

    John Landsverk;C. Hendricks Brown;Justin D. Smith;Patricia Chamberlain

  • Implementation Research Methodologies for Achieving Scientific Equity and Health Equity

    Moira McNulty;J D Smith;Juan Villamar;Inger Burnett-Zeigler

  • Reducing Cardiovascular Disparities Through Community-Engaged Implementation Research: A National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Workshop Report.

    George A. Mensah;Richard S. Cooper;Anna Maria Siega-Riz;Lisa A. Cooper

  • Future Directions for Early Childhood Prevention of Mental Disorders: A Road Map to Mental Health, Earlier

    Lauren S Wakschlag;Megan York Roberts;Rachel Flynn;J D Smith

  • Indirect effects of fidelity to the family check-up on changes in parenting and early childhood problem behaviors.

    Justin D. Smith;Thomas J. Dishion;Daniel S. Shaw;Melvin N. Wilson

  • Geographic and Individual Associations with PrEP Stigma: Results from the RADAR Cohort of Diverse Young Men Who have Sex with Men and Transgender Women

    Brian Mustanski;Daniel T. Ryan;Christina Hayford;Gregory Lee Phillips

  • Therapeutic assessment for preadolescent boys with oppositional defiant disorder: a replicated single-case time-series design.

    Justin D. Smith;Leonard Handler;Michael R. Nash

  • Preventing Weight Gain and Obesity: Indirect Effects of the Family Check-Up in Early Childhood

    Justin D. Smith;Justin D. Smith;Zorash Montaño;Thomas J. Dishion;Thomas J. Dishion;Daniel S. Shaw

  • Network interventions for managing the COVID-19 pandemic and sustaining economy.

    Akihiro Nishi;George Dewey;Akira Endo;Sophia Neman

  • Designs and methods for implementation research: Advancing the mission of the CTSA program

    Soohyun Hwang;Sarah A. Birken;Cathy L. Melvin;Catherine L. Rohweder

  • Memantine augmentation in clozapine-refractory schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study.

    S. R. T. Veerman;P. F. J. Schulte;J. D. Smith;L. de Haan

  • Longitudinal relations between observed parenting behaviors and dietary quality of meals from ages 2 to 5.

    Zorash Montaño;Justin D. Smith;Thomas J. Dishion;Daniel S. Shaw

  • Attachment status and mother–preschooler parasympathetic response to the strange situation procedure

    Justin D. Smith;Susan S. Woodhouse;Caron A.C. Clark;Elizabeth A. Skowron

  • Therapeutic assessment promotes treatment readiness but does not affect symptom change in patients with personality disorders: Findings from a randomized clinical trial

    Hilde De Saeger;Jan H. Kamphuis;Stephen E. Finn;Justin D. Smith

  • Virtual interview training for autistic transition age youth: A randomized controlled feasibility and effectiveness trial.

    Matthew J Smith;Kari Sherwood;Brittany Ross;Justin D Smith

  • Testing the Effectiveness of Family Therapeutic Assessment: A Case Study Using a Time-Series Design

    Justin D. Smith;Nicole J. Wolf;Leonard Handler;Michael R. Nash

  • Parenting Interventions in Pediatric Primary Care: A Systematic Review.

    Justin D. Smith;Gracelyn H. Cruden;Lourdes M. Rojas;Mark Van Ryzin

  • An individually tailored family-centered intervention for pediatric obesity in primary care: study protocol of a randomized type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial (Raising Healthy Children study).

    Justin D. Smith;Cady Berkel;Neil Jordan;David C. Atkins

  • Effects of video feedback on early coercive parent-child interactions: the intervening role of caregivers' relational schemas.

    Justin D. Smith;Thomas J. Dishion;Kevin J. Moore;Daniel S. Shaw

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas J. Dishion
Thomas J. Dishion Arizona State University
Frank J. Schwab
Frank J. Schwab Hospital for Special Surgery
Christopher P. Ames
Christopher P. Ames University of California, San Francisco
Virginie Lafage
Virginie Lafage Lenox Hill Hospital
C. Hendricks Brown
C. Hendricks Brown Northwestern University
Melvin N. Wilson
Melvin N. Wilson University of Virginia
Daniel S. Shaw
Daniel S. Shaw University of Pittsburgh
Michael G. Fehlings
Michael G. Fehlings University of Toronto
Lauren S. Wakschlag
Lauren S. Wakschlag Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to a variety of rewarding career pathways, particularly in the area of substance abuse counseling. Online degree programs make it easier than ever to earn a relevant qualification and start your career in this critical field. However, it's important to note that certification and education requirements for substance abuse counselors can differ significantly depending on your location.

For example, those interested in working in Oklahoma can review the Tulsa substance abuse counselor certification requirements to understand the credentialing process. In Virginia, prospective counselors should be aware of the Virginia Beach substance abuse counselors education requirements, which may include specific coursework or state exams.

If your goals lead you to the nation’s capital, it's crucial to become familiar with Washington DC substance abuse counselors education requirements. Meanwhile, aspiring professionals in Kansas can find guidance in the Wichita substance abuse counselors education requirements.

No matter where you choose to study or work, starting with the right degree can help smooth your path to a meaningful career in psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Justin D. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles