World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
5398
World Ranking
9223
National Ranking
4886

Justin D. Smith publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Justin D. Smith sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 148 publications — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Justin D. Smith D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Justin D. Smith sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Justin D. Smith is affiliated with the University of Utah in the United States with a research focus primarily in health professions and medicine. Their work spans numerous subfields including general health professions, public health, environmental and occupational health, clinical psychology, pediatrics, perinatology, child health, and economics and econometrics.

Their scientific contributions engage with several main topics such as health policy implementation science, primary care and health outcomes, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, child and adolescent health, mental health and patient involvement, health sciences research and education, and health systems, economic evaluations, and quality of life.

Justin D. Smith has published extensively in several venues, most frequently in:

  • Implementation Science Communications
  • Implementation Science
  • Families Systems & Health
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Prevention Science

Their recent papers reflect a focus on implementation science and health management, including:

  • The Implementation Research Logic Model: a method for planning, executing, reporting, and synthesizing implementation projects (2020, Implementation Science)
  • Prevention and Management of Childhood Obesity and Its Psychological and Health Comorbidities (2020, Annual Review of Clinical Psychology)
  • Reflections on 10 years of effectiveness-implementation hybrid studies (2022, Frontiers in Health Services)
  • Implementation strategies for digital mental health interventions in health care settings (2020, American Psychologist)
  • Network interventions for managing the COVID-19 pandemic and sustaining economy (2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)

Their work involves collaboration with multiple frequent co-authors including:

  • Allison J. Carroll
  • Neil Jordan
  • David Cella
  • James L. Merle
  • Sofia F. Garcia

Best Publications

  • Media and Young Minds

    Jenny Radesky;Dimitri Christakis;David Hill;Nusheen Ameenuddin

  • Single-case experimental designs: a systematic review of published research and current standards.

    Justin D. Smith

  • Prevention and Management of Childhood Obesity and Its Psychological and Health Comorbidities.

    Justin D. Smith;Emily Fu;Marissa A. Kobayashi

  • Coercive family process and early-onset conduct problems from age 2 to school entry.

    Justin D. Smith;Thomas J. Dishion;Daniel S. Shaw;Melvin N. Wilson

  • Implementation strategies for digital mental health interventions in health care settings.

    Andrea K Graham;Emily G Lattie;Byron J Powell;Aaron R Lyon

  • Design and analysis in dissemination and implementation research

    John Landsverk;C. Hendricks Brown;Justin D. Smith;Patricia Chamberlain

  • Implementation Research Methodologies for Achieving Scientific Equity and Health Equity

    Moira McNulty;J D Smith;Juan Villamar;Inger Burnett-Zeigler

  • Reducing Cardiovascular Disparities Through Community-Engaged Implementation Research: A National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Workshop Report.

    George A. Mensah;Richard S. Cooper;Anna Maria Siega-Riz;Lisa A. Cooper

  • Future Directions for Early Childhood Prevention of Mental Disorders: A Road Map to Mental Health, Earlier

    Lauren S Wakschlag;Megan York Roberts;Rachel Flynn;J D Smith

  • Indirect effects of fidelity to the family check-up on changes in parenting and early childhood problem behaviors.

    Justin D. Smith;Thomas J. Dishion;Daniel S. Shaw;Melvin N. Wilson

  • Geographic and Individual Associations with PrEP Stigma: Results from the RADAR Cohort of Diverse Young Men Who have Sex with Men and Transgender Women

    Brian Mustanski;Daniel T. Ryan;Christina Hayford;Gregory Lee Phillips

  • Therapeutic assessment for preadolescent boys with oppositional defiant disorder: a replicated single-case time-series design.

    Justin D. Smith;Leonard Handler;Michael R. Nash

  • Preventing Weight Gain and Obesity: Indirect Effects of the Family Check-Up in Early Childhood

    Justin D. Smith;Justin D. Smith;Zorash Montaño;Thomas J. Dishion;Thomas J. Dishion;Daniel S. Shaw

  • Network interventions for managing the COVID-19 pandemic and sustaining economy.

    Akihiro Nishi;George Dewey;Akira Endo;Sophia Neman

  • Designs and methods for implementation research: Advancing the mission of the CTSA program

    Soohyun Hwang;Sarah A. Birken;Cathy L. Melvin;Catherine L. Rohweder

  • Memantine augmentation in clozapine-refractory schizophrenia: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study.

    S. R. T. Veerman;P. F. J. Schulte;J. D. Smith;L. de Haan

  • Longitudinal relations between observed parenting behaviors and dietary quality of meals from ages 2 to 5.

    Zorash Montaño;Justin D. Smith;Thomas J. Dishion;Daniel S. Shaw

  • Attachment status and mother–preschooler parasympathetic response to the strange situation procedure

    Justin D. Smith;Susan S. Woodhouse;Caron A.C. Clark;Elizabeth A. Skowron

  • Therapeutic assessment promotes treatment readiness but does not affect symptom change in patients with personality disorders: Findings from a randomized clinical trial

    Hilde De Saeger;Jan H. Kamphuis;Stephen E. Finn;Justin D. Smith

  • Virtual interview training for autistic transition age youth: A randomized controlled feasibility and effectiveness trial.

    Matthew J Smith;Kari Sherwood;Brittany Ross;Justin D Smith

  • Testing the Effectiveness of Family Therapeutic Assessment: A Case Study Using a Time-Series Design

    Justin D. Smith;Nicole J. Wolf;Leonard Handler;Michael R. Nash

  • Parenting Interventions in Pediatric Primary Care: A Systematic Review.

    Justin D. Smith;Gracelyn H. Cruden;Lourdes M. Rojas;Mark Van Ryzin

  • An individually tailored family-centered intervention for pediatric obesity in primary care: study protocol of a randomized type II hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial (Raising Healthy Children study).

    Justin D. Smith;Cady Berkel;Neil Jordan;David C. Atkins

  • Effects of video feedback on early coercive parent-child interactions: the intervening role of caregivers' relational schemas.

    Justin D. Smith;Thomas J. Dishion;Kevin J. Moore;Daniel S. Shaw

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas J. Dishion
Thomas J. Dishion Arizona State University
Frank J. Schwab
Frank J. Schwab Hospital for Special Surgery
Christopher P. Ames
Christopher P. Ames University of California, San Francisco
Virginie Lafage
Virginie Lafage Lenox Hill Hospital
C. Hendricks Brown
C. Hendricks Brown Northwestern University
Melvin N. Wilson
Melvin N. Wilson University of Virginia
Daniel S. Shaw
Daniel S. Shaw University of Pittsburgh
Michael G. Fehlings
Michael G. Fehlings University of Toronto
Lauren S. Wakschlag
Lauren S. Wakschlag Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to a variety of rewarding career pathways, particularly in the area of substance abuse counseling. Online degree programs make it easier than ever to earn a relevant qualification and start your career in this critical field. However, it's important to note that certification and education requirements for substance abuse counselors can differ significantly depending on your location.

For example, those interested in working in Oklahoma can review the Tulsa substance abuse counselor certification requirements to understand the credentialing process. In Virginia, prospective counselors should be aware of the Virginia Beach substance abuse counselors education requirements, which may include specific coursework or state exams.

If your goals lead you to the nation’s capital, it's crucial to become familiar with Washington DC substance abuse counselors education requirements. Meanwhile, aspiring professionals in Kansas can find guidance in the Wichita substance abuse counselors education requirements.

No matter where you choose to study or work, starting with the right degree can help smooth your path to a meaningful career in psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Justin D. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles