World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
69
Citations
17902
World Ranking
2369
National Ranking
1380

Mark A. Whisman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Whisman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 185 publications — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark A. Whisman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark A. Whisman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark A. Whisman is affiliated with the University of Colorado Boulder in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with a substantial focus on Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology as key subfields. The scope of their work includes experimental and cognitive psychology alongside aspects of demography and public health.

The scientist's research centers on topics such as Attachment and Relationship Dynamics, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, and Family Dynamics and Relationships. Additional areas of investigation include Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum, Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes, Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving, and Health Disparities and Outcomes.

Frequent co-authors in their collaborative work include Julia M. Salinger, David A. Sbarra, Anna L Gilmour, Steven R. H. Beach, and Ashley K. Randall.

Marked publication venues for Mark A. Whisman include:

  • Journal of Family Psychology
  • Current Opinion in Psychology
  • Family Process
  • Journal of Clinical Psychology
  • Health Psychology

Notable recent publications are:

  • Intimate Relationships and Depression: Searching for Causation in the Sea of Association, 2021, Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
  • Divorce, health, and socioeconomic status: An agenda for psychological science, 2021, Current Opinion in Psychology
  • Relationship dissolution and psychopathology, 2021, Current Opinion in Psychology
  • Marital satisfaction as a potential moderator of the association between stress and depression, 2023, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • A dyadic analysis of relationship satisfaction and depressive symptoms among same-sex couples, 2021, Journal of Family Psychology

Best Publications

  • The association between depression and marital dissatisfaction.

    Mark A. Whisman

  • Gender differences in rumination: A meta-analysis.

    Daniel P. Johnson;Mark A. Whisman

  • Marital distress and DSM-IV psychiatric disorders in a population-based national survey.

    Mark A. Whisman

  • Factor structure of the Beck Depression Inventory—Second Edition (BDI-II) in a student sample.

    Mark A. Whisman;John E. Perez;Wiveka Ramel

  • Designing, Testing, and Interpreting Interactions and Moderator Effects in Family Research.

    Mark A. Whisman;Gary H. McClelland

  • Therapists' perspectives of couple problems and treatment issues in couple therapy

    Mark A. Whisman;Amy E. Dixon;Benjamin Johnson

  • Psychopathology and marital satisfaction: the importance of evaluating both partners.

    Mark A. Whisman;Lisa A. Uebelacker;Lauren M. Weinstock

  • Marital dissatisfaction and incidence of major depressive episode in a community sample.

    Mark A. Whisman;Martha L. Bruce

  • Current status and future directions in couple therapy.

    Douglas K. Snyder;Angela M. Castellani;Mark A. Whisman

  • Marital dissatisfaction and psychiatric disorders : Results from the National Comorbidity Survey

    Mark A. Whisman

  • Intimate Relationships and Psychopathology

    Mark A. Whisman;Donald H. Baucom

  • Sexual desire and relationship functioning: The effects of marital satisfaction and power

    Michael Brezsnyak;Mark A. Whisman

  • Psychiatric disorders and dissatisfaction with social relationships: does type of relationship matter?

    Mark A. Whisman;C. Tess Sheldon;Paula Goering

  • Mediators and moderators of change in cognitive therapy of depression

    Mark A. Whisman

  • Prospective associations between marital discord and depressive symptoms in middle-aged and older adults.

    Mark A. Whisman;Lisa A. Uebelacker

  • Predicting sexual infidelity in a population-based sample of married individuals.

    Mark A. Whisman;Kristina Coop Gordon;Yael Chatav

  • Neuroticism as a common feature of the depressive and anxiety disorders: a test of the revised integrative hierarchical model in a national sample.

    Lauren M. Weinstock;Mark A. Whisman

  • Sexual infidelity in a national survey of American women: differences in prevalence and correlates as a function of method of assessment.

    Mark A. Whisman;Douglas K. Snyder

  • Impairment and distress associated with relationship discord in a national sample of married or cohabiting adults.

    Mark A. Whisman;Lisa A. Uebelacker

  • Longitudinal association between marital dissatisfaction and alcohol use disorders in a community sample.

    Mark A. Whisman;Lisa A. Uebelacker;Martha L. Bruce

Frequent Co-Authors

Lisa A. Uebelacker
Lisa A. Uebelacker Brown University
Steven R. H. Beach
Steven R. H. Beach University of Georgia
Douglas K. Snyder
Douglas K. Snyder Texas A&M University
Neil S. Jacobson
Neil S. Jacobson University of Washington
Soo Hyun Rhee
Soo Hyun Rhee University of Colorado Boulder
David A. Sbarra
David A. Sbarra University of Arizona
Kelly D. Brownell
Kelly D. Brownell Duke University
John K. Hewitt
John K. Hewitt University of Colorado Boulder
Robin P. Corley
Robin P. Corley University of Colorado Boulder
Ivan W. Miller
Ivan W. Miller Brown University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology as a field of study can open doors to numerous online degree options and diverse career pathways. Many students in psychology eventually choose careers in areas like social work, counseling, and mental health services. Whether you’re interested in direct client support, clinical work, or community engagement, understanding available programs is key.

If you’re looking for specific opportunities, there are regionally strong programs worth considering. For example, students in the Midwest may want to explore the best social work degree programs in North Dakota. Those in the Northeast can benefit from insights into the top social work degrees in the Northeast. In the central U.S., check out the best social work degrees in Oklahoma. For city-specific options, prospective students may consider the best social work programs in Philadelphia.

As psychology and social work are closely linked, exploring these top programs can help you clarify the best educational and career direction based on your interests and location.

Best Scientists Citing Mark A. Whisman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles