World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Spain
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
69
Citations
20580
World Ranking
1966
National Ranking
22

Joost van de Weijer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joost van de Weijer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 233 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Joost van de Weijer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joost van de Weijer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Spain Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Spain Leader Award

Overview

Joost van de Weijer is affiliated with the Autonomous University of Barcelona in Spain. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Computer Science, with specializations in Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cancer Research, and Epidemiology.

The scientist's work engages with a range of main topics, including:

  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Generative Adversarial Networks and Image Synthesis
  • COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Machine Learning and ELM
  • Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques

Recent publications by Joost van de Weijer include the following papers:

  • Class-Incremental Learning: Survey and Performance Evaluation on Image Classification (2022), IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
  • Avalanche: An end-to-end library for continual learning (2021), CINECA IRIS Institutional research information system (University of Pisa)
  • Exploiting the Intrinsic Neighborhood Structure for Source-free Domain Adaptation (2021), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Class-incremental learning: survey and performance evaluation on image classification (2020), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Self-Training for Class-Incremental Semantic Segmentation (2022), IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems

The scientist frequently publishes in several venues, notably:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops (CVPRW)
  • IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
  • International Journal of Computer Vision
  • Computer Vision and Image Understanding

Joost van de Weijer has collaborated with several researchers on numerous projects. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Bartłomiej Twardowski
  • Luis Herranz
  • Yaxing Wang
  • Kai Wang
  • Andrew D. Bagdanov

Best Publications

  • Adaptive Color Attributes for Real-Time Visual Tracking

    Martin Danelljan;Fahad Shahbaz Khan;Michael Felsberg;Joost van de Weijer

  • Learning Color Names for Real-World Applications

    J. van de Weijer;C. Schmid;J. Verbeek;D. Larlus

  • Invertible Conditional GANs for image editing.

    Guim Perarnau;Joost van de Weijer;Bogdan Raducanu;Jose M. Álvarez

  • Computational Color Constancy: Survey and Experiments

    A. Gijsenij;T. Gevers;J. van de Weijer

  • The sixth visual object tracking VOT2018 challenge results

    Matej Kristan;Aleš Leonardis;Jiří Matas;Michael Felsberg

  • Coloring Local Feature Extraction

    Joost Van De Weijer;Cordelia Schmid

  • Class-incremental learning: survey and performance evaluation on image classification

    Marc Masana;Xialei Liu;Bartlomiej Twardowski;Mikel Menta

  • Fast anisotropic Gauss filtering

    J.-M. Geusebroek;A.W.M. Smeulders;J. van de Weijer

  • RankIQA: Learning from Rankings for No-Reference Image Quality Assessment

    Xialei Liu;Joost van de Weijer;Andrew D. Bagdanov

  • The Seventh Visual Object Tracking VOT2019 Challenge Results

    Matej Kristan;Amanda Berg;Linyu Zheng;Litu Rout

  • Boosting color saliency in image feature detection

    J. van de Weijer;T. Gevers;A.D. Bagdanov

  • Learning the Model Update for Siamese Trackers

    Lichao Zhang;Abel Gonzalez-Garcia;Joost Van De Weijer;Martin Danelljan

  • The Visual Object Tracking VOT2014 challenge results

    Matej Kristan;Roman P. Pflugfelder;Ales Leonardis;Jiri Matas

  • Color attributes for object detection

    Fahad Shahbaz Khan;Rao Muhammad Anwer;Joost van de Weijer;Andrew D. Bagdanov

  • Leveraging Unlabeled Data for Crowd Counting by Learning to Rank

    Xialei Liu;Joost van de Weijer;Andrew D. Bagdanov

  • Generalized Gamut Mapping using Image Derivative Structures for Color Constancy

    Arjan Gijsenij;Theo Gevers;Joost Weijer

  • Semantic Drift Compensation for Class-Incremental Learning

    Lu Yu;Bartlomiej Twardowski;Xialei Liu;Luis Herranz

  • Binary patterns encoded convolutional neural networks for texture recognition and remote sensing scene classification

    Rao Muhammad Anwer;Fahad Shahbaz Khan;Joost van de Weijer;Matthieu Molinier

  • Transferring GANs: generating images from limited data

    Yaxing Wang;Chenshen Wu;Luis Herranz;Joost van de Weijer

  • Rotate your Networks: Better Weight Consolidation and Less Catastrophic Forgetting

    Xialei Liu;Marc Masana;Luis Herranz;Joost Van de Weijer

  • Learning Color Names from Real-World Images

    J. van de Weijer;C. Schmid;J. Verbeek

  • Class-incremental learning: survey and performance evaluation

    Marc Masana;Xialei Liu;Bartlomiej Twardowski;Mikel Menta

Frequent Co-Authors

Fahad Shahbaz Khan
Fahad Shahbaz Khan Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence
Andrew D. Bagdanov
Andrew D. Bagdanov University of Florence
Theo Gevers
Theo Gevers University of Amsterdam
Antonio M. López
Antonio M. López Autonomous University of Barcelona
Michael Felsberg
Michael Felsberg Linköping University
Jan-Mark Geusebroek
Jan-Mark Geusebroek University of Amsterdam
Rao Muhammad Anwer
Rao Muhammad Anwer Aalto University
Jorma Laaksonen
Jorma Laaksonen Aalto University
Frédéric Jurie
Frédéric Jurie Université de Caen Normandie

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a range of related online degrees and career pathways. Students interested in technical fields often consider programs like mechanical engineering, physics, data science, and electrical engineering for greater flexibility and specialization.

One factor students must weigh is mechanical engineering degree online cost, as affordability can vary widely between institutions and impact long-term financial planning. Similarly, pursuing an online theoretical physics degree gives learners the chance to dive into advanced scientific concepts, perfect for those who want to complement a computer science background with theoretical skills.

Data science programs are another popular option. By focusing on statistics, machine learning, and big data, these programs prepare graduates for in-demand roles in tech and analytics industries. Additionally, students looking at careers in high-tech manufacturing, energy, or telecommunications often research online electrical engineering career outcomes to understand job prospects and earning potential.

By examining related online degree opportunities, students can better map out a career pathway that matches their interests and the evolving demands of the tech industry.

Best Scientists Citing Joost van de Weijer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles