World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 71 2138 1943 1247 1107 287 23507

George W. Rebok publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by George W. Rebok between 1977 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. George W. Rebok published across 49 years, from 1977 to 2025, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2019. 17 of the 324 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1977 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2019. 1977: 1 publication 1978: 0 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 0 publications 1986: 1 publication 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 2 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 6 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 18 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 9 publications
1977 2025

324 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
George W. Rebok: publications per year, 1977 to 2025
Year Publications
1977 1
1978 0
1979 3
1980 2
1981 2
1982 0
1983 3
1984 1
1985 0
1986 1
1987 0
1988 1
1989 2
1990 2
1991 3
1992 1
1993 2
1994 5
1995 2
1996 2
1997 3
1998 1
1999 2
2000 1
2001 6
2002 6
2003 5
2004 10
2005 3
2006 3
2007 7
2008 10
2009 12
2010 6
2011 13
2012 23
2013 14
2014 15
2015 9
2016 13
2017 13
2018 13
2019 26
2020 14
2021 15
2022 13
2023 18
2024 8
2025 9
Total 324
Download as CSV

George W. Rebok publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George W. Rebok sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 281–290 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 287 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139 287
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

George W. Rebok D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where George W. Rebok sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 70–71 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215 71
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1994 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

George W. Rebok is affiliated with Johns Hopkins University in the United States and has an extensive publication record primarily in psychology and medicine. Their research spans multiple subfields, including neuropsychology and physiological psychology, psychiatry and mental health, health, cognitive neuroscience, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The main topics of their work focus on aging and gerontology research, dementia and cognitive impairment, health disparities and outcomes, behavioral health and interventions, hearing loss and rehabilitation, technology use by older adults, and physical activity and health.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Innovation in Aging
  • Journal of Aging and Health
  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • SLEEP
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B

They have collaborated regularly with several coauthors, notably:

  • Alison Huang
  • Roland J. Thorpe
  • Jennifer A. Deal
  • Rachel Wu
  • Sherry L. Willis

Notable recent papers include:

  • "Association of Hearing Loss With Psychological Distress and Utilization of Mental Health Services Among Adults in the United States" (2020, JAMA Network Open)
  • "The relationship between older adults' technology use, in-person engagement, and pandemic-related mental health" (2022, Aging & Mental Health)
  • "Hearing Impairment and Loneliness in Older Adults in the United States" (2020, Journal of Applied Gerontology)
  • "An Internet-Based Intervention Augmented With a Diet and Physical Activity Consultation to Decrease the Risk of Dementia in At-Risk Adults in a Primary Care Setting: Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial" (2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research)
  • "Dual cognitive and mobility impairments and future dementia - Setting a research agenda" (2023, Alzheimer's & Dementia)

George W. Rebok was recognized as a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1994.

Best Publications

  • Effects of Cognitive training interventions with older adults. A randomized controlled trial

    Karlene Ball;Daniel B. Berch;Karin F. Helmers;Jared B. Jobe

  • Long-term effects of cognitive training on everyday functional outcomes in older adults

    Sherry L. Willis;Sharon L. Tennstedt;Michael Marsiske;Karlene Ball

  • Ten-year effects of the advanced cognitive training for independent and vital elderly cognitive training trial on cognition and everyday functioning in older adults.

    George W. Rebok;Karlene Ball;Lin T. Guey;Richard N. Jones

  • Computerized Cognitive Training with Older Adults: A Systematic Review

    Alexandra M. Kueider;Jeanine M. Parisi;Alden L. Gross;George W. Rebok

  • A social model for health promotion for an aging population: initial evidence on the Experience Corps model.

    Linda P. Fried;Michelle C. Carlson;Marc Freedman;Kevin D. Frick

  • The course and malleability of aggressive behavior from early first grade into middle school: results of a developmental epidemiologically-based preventive trial

    Sheppard G. Kellam;George W. Rebok;Nicholas Ialongo;Lawrence S. Mayer

  • Active: A cognitive intervention trial to promote independence in older adults

    Jared B. Jobe;David M. Smith;Karlene Ball;Sharon L. Tennstedt

  • The short-term impact of two classroom-based preventive interventions on aggressive and shy behaviors and poor achievement

    Lawrence J. Dolan;Sheppard G. Kellam;C. Hendricks Brown;Lisa Werthamer-Larsson

  • Building developmental and etiological theory through epidemiologically based preventive intervention trials.

    Sheppard G. Kellam;George W. Rebok

  • Elementary school-aged children's reports of their health: a cognitive interviewing study

    George W Rebok;Anne W Riley;Christopher B Forrest;Barbara Starfield

  • Social Network Characteristics and Cognition in Middle-Aged and Older Adults

    Ronald E. Holtzman;George W. Rebok;Jane S. Saczynski;Jane S. Saczynski;Anthony C. Kouzis

  • Exploring the Effects of an “Everyday” Activity Program on Executive Function and Memory in Older Adults: Experience Corps®

    Michelle C. Carlson;Jane S. Saczynski;George W. Rebok;Teresa E. Seeman

  • Evidence for Neurocognitive Plasticity in At-Risk Older Adults: The Experience Corps Program

    Michelle C. Carlson;Kirk I. Erickson;Arthur F. Kramer;Michelle W. Voss

  • Training and Maintaining Memory Abilities in Healthy Older Adults: Traditional and Novel Approaches

    George W. Rebok;Michelle C. Carlson;Jessica B. S. Langbaum

  • Driving Cessation and Health Trajectories in Older Adults

    Jerri D. Edwards;Melissa Lunsman;Martinique Perkins;George W. Rebok

  • Memory self-efficacy and performance differences in young and old adults: The effect of mnemonic training.

    George W. Rebok;Laurie J. Balcerak

  • Social Integration and Social Support Among Older Adults Following Driving Cessation

    Briana Mezuk;George W. Rebok

  • Developmental epidemiologically based preventive trials: baseline modeling of early target behaviors and depressive symptoms.

    Sheppard G. Kellam;Lisa Werthamer-Larsson;Lawrence J. Dolan;C. Hendricks Brown

  • Memory training interventions for older adults: A meta-analysis

    Alden L. Gross;Jeanine M. Parisi;Adam P. Spira;Alexandra M. Kueider

  • Advanced cognitive training for breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial

    Diane Von Ah;Janet S. Carpenter;Andrew Saykin;Patrick Monahan

  • Elementary school-aged children's reports of their health: A cognitive

    G. Rebok;A. Riley;C. Forrest;B. Starfield

Frequent Co-Authors

Linda P. Fried
Linda P. Fried Columbia University
Adam P. Spira
Adam P. Spira Johns Hopkins University
Teresa E. Seeman
Teresa E. Seeman University of California, Los Angeles
Michael Marsiske
Michael Marsiske University of Florida
Sherry L. Willis
Sherry L. Willis University of Washington
Kaarin J. Anstey
Kaarin J. Anstey University of New South Wales
Kevin D. Frick
Kevin D. Frick Johns Hopkins University
Karlene Ball
Karlene Ball University of Alabama at Birmingham
Richard N. Jones
Richard N. Jones Brown University
Marilyn S. Albert
Marilyn S. Albert Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology opens up a variety of online study options and career pathways in counseling and mental health. Many students look for flexible, accelerated programs that allow them to start their careers as quickly as possible.

States across the U.S. offer distinct requirements and timelines for counseling careers, but several now provide streamlined educational routes. For example, those interested in becoming a counselor in Alaska can explore Alaska fastest counseling programs designed to fast-track licensure.

Similarly, if you are based in Arizona, you may be interested in learning about the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Arizona. Those in Arkansas have options as well, including the fastest way to become a counselor in Arkansas.

Prospective students in California can explore the quickest path to becoming a counselor in California. These accelerated routes often include online coursework for greater flexibility, helping you enter the workforce sooner while meeting state licensure requirements.

Best Scientists Citing George W. Rebok

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles