World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Anna-Beth Doyle

Anna-Beth Doyle

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
6558
World Ranking
10091
National Ranking
704

Anna-Beth Doyle publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna-Beth Doyle sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 55 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Anna-Beth Doyle D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anna-Beth Doyle sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anna-Beth Doyle is affiliated with Concordia University in Canada. Their academic profile indicates an active presence in research, although specific details on papers, topics, and publication venues are not provided.

Due to the absence of detailed data on recent publications, co-authors, and areas of research, it is not possible to enumerate specific fields of study, subfields, or main topics.

The profile does not record any awards, book publications, or notable citations linked to their work.

Overall, Anna-Beth Doyle represents a research professional associated with Concordia University, but without additional publicly available bibliometric data or documented research outputs in the provided source, further elaboration on their academic contributions is limited.

Best Publications

  • A Longitudinal Study of White Children's Racial Prejudice as a Social-Cognitive Development.

    Anna Beth Doyle;Frances E. Aboud

  • Developmental Patterns in Security of Attachment to Mother and Father in Late Childhood and Early Adolescence: Associations with Peer Relations

    Melissa Lieberman;Anna-Beth Doyle;Dorothy Markiewicz

  • Developmental Differences in Adolescents’ and Young Adults’ Use of Mothers, Fathers, Best Friends, and Romantic Partners to Fulfill Attachment Needs

    Dorothy Markiewicz;Heather Lawford;Anna Beth Doyle;Natalie Haggart

  • Relation of Social Fantasy Play to Social Competence in Preschoolers

    Jennifer A. Connolly;Anna-Beth Doyle

  • Associations between parenting style and attachment to mother in middle childhood and adolescence

    Leigh Karavasilis;Anna Beth Doyle;Dorothy Markiewicz

  • The quality of adolescents' friendships: associations with mothers' interpersonal relationships, attachments to parents and friends, and prosocial behaviors.

    Dorothy Markiewicz;Anna Beth Doyle;Mara Brendgen

  • Parenting, Marital Conflict and Adjustment from Early- To Mid-Adolescence: Mediated by Adolescent Attachment Style?.

    Anna Beth Doyle;Dorothy Markiewicz

  • Gender, ethnic, and body type biases: The generality of prejudice in childhood.

    Kimberly K. Powlishta;Lisa A. Serbin;Anna-Beth Doyle;Donna R. White

  • The Effect of Playmate Familiarity on the Social Interactions of Young Children.

    Anna-Beth Doyle;Jennifer Connolly;Louis-Paul Rivest

  • Developmental Patterns in the Flexibility of Children's Ethnic Attitudes

    Anna-Beth Doyle;Jocelyne Beaudet;Frances Aboud

  • Parental and peer influences on children's racial attitudes☆

    Frances E. Aboud;Anna-Beth Doyle

  • Attachment Style with Mother, Father, Best Friend, and Romantic Partner during Adolescence.

    Anna Beth Doyle;Heather Lawford;Dorothy Markiewicz

  • Does talk of race foster prejudice or tolerance in children

    Frances E. Aboud;Anna Beth Doyle

  • Attachment Security with Mother and Father: Associations with Adolescents' Reports of Interpersonal Behavior with Parents and Peers

    Jennifer Ducharme;Anna Beth Doyle;Dorothy Markiewicz

  • The Relations between Friendship Quality, Ranked-Friendship Preference, and Adolescents' Behavior with Their Friends.

    Mara Brendgen;Dorothy Markiewicz;Anna Beth Doyle;William M. Bukowski

  • The early development of sex-differentiated patterns of social influence.

    Lisa A. Serbin;Carol Sprafkin;Meryl Elman;Anna-Beth Doyle

  • Assessment of social competence in preschoolers: Teachers versus peers.

    Jennifer Connolly;Anna-Beth Doyle

  • The socialization of sex-differentiated skills and academic performance: a mediational model

    Lisa A. Serbin;Phyllis Zelkowitz;Anna-Beth Doyle;Dolores Gold

  • Listening to distraction: A developmental study of selective attention

    Unknown

  • Attachment to parents, best friend, and romantic partner: Predicting different pathways to depression in adolescence.

    Stephanie K. Margolese;Dorothy Markiewicz;Anna Beth Doyle

  • Infant Development in Day Care.

    Anna-Beth Doyle

Frequent Co-Authors

Mara Brendgen
Mara Brendgen University of Quebec at Montreal
Jennifer Connolly
Jennifer Connolly York University
Lisa A. Serbin
Lisa A. Serbin Concordia University
Frances E. Aboud
Frances E. Aboud McGill University
William M. Bukowski
William M. Bukowski Concordia University
Phyllis Zelkowitz
Phyllis Zelkowitz McGill University
Joan M. Patterson
Joan M. Patterson University of Minnesota
Simon Larose
Simon Larose Université Laval
Michel Boivin
Michel Boivin Université Laval
Alex E. Schwartzman
Alex E. Schwartzman Concordia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to diverse online degrees and exciting career options. Many students explore pathways in counseling, therapy, and behavioral health, where the demand for qualified professionals is steadily rising.

If you’re interested in supporting individuals struggling with addiction, becoming a substance abuse counselor is a rewarding option. Key topics to consider include state licensing, education requirements, and certification processes. For example, review the Charlotte substance abuse counselor certification requirements to learn about necessary degrees and supervised experience.

The pathway to this career can differ by region. Aspiring professionals should understand the steps involved in becoming a substance abuse counselor in Chesapeake or look into Chicago substance abuse counselor certification requirements for city-specific credentials. For those considering work in California, review Chula Vista substance abuse counselors education requirements to understand local standards.

Online psychology degrees often include courses in addiction, abnormal psychology, and counseling skills—key foundations for roles in mental health care. Research your state’s requirements to choose the best educational pathway for your psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Anna-Beth Doyle

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles