World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
10487
World Ranking
10336
National Ranking
5426

Mary A. Hammond publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary A. Hammond sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 49 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mary A. Hammond D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary A. Hammond sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mary A. Hammond is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States. The academic profile of this researcher reflects engagement within a reputable institution known for its contributions to various scientific fields.

Information about Mary A. Hammond's recent papers, frequent co-authors, and publication venues is currently not available. Similarly, data on book publications and detailed fields or subfields of study have not been listed.

Due to the absence of specifics on the topics of research, the overview cannot highlight precise themes or subject areas that are central to their work. Likewise, there is no record of awards or honors that have been conferred.

Given the limited publicly available data, the profile remains strictly factual and restrained to affiliations and the scope of data presented without extrapolation.

Best Publications

  • Treating children with early-onset conduct problems: a comparison of child and parent training interventions.

    Carolyn Webster-Stratton;Mary Hammond

  • Treating Children With Early-Onset Conduct Problems: Intervention Outcomes for Parent, Child, and Teacher Training

    Carolyn Webster-Stratton;M. Jamila Reid;Mary Hammond

  • Preventing Conduct Problems, Promoting Social Competence: A Parent and Teacher Training Partnership in Head Start

    Carolyn Webster-Stratton;M. Jamila Reid;Mary Hammond

  • Home Environment and Cognitive Development in the First 3 Years of Life: A Collaborative Study Involving Six Sites and Three Ethnic Groups in North America

    Robert H. Bradley;Bettye M. Caldwell;Stephen L. Rock;Craig T. Ramey

  • Maternal depression and its relationship to life stress, perceptions of child behavior problems, parenting behaviors, and child conduct problems.

    Carolyn Webster-Stratton;Mary Hammond

  • Prediction of IQ and language skill from perinatal status, child performance, family characteristics, and mother-infant interaction.

    Helen L. Bee;Kathryn E. Barnard;Sandra J. Eyres;Carol A. Gray

  • Social Skills and Problem-solving Training for Children with Early-onset Conduct Problems: Who Benefits?

    Carolyn Webster-Stratton;Jamila Reid;Mary Hammond

  • Predictors of treatment outcome in parent training for families with conduct problem children

    Carolyn Webster-Stratton;Mary Hammond

  • Conduct problems and level of social competence in Head Start children: prevalence, pervasiveness, and associated risk factors

    Carolyn Webster-Stratton;Mary Hammond

  • Follow-Up of Children Who Received the Incredible Years Intervention for Oppositional-Defiant Disorder: Maintenance and Prediction of 2-Year Outcome.

    M. Jamila Reid;Carolyn Webster-Stratton;Mary Hammond

  • The family's functioning with newly diagnosed breast cancer in the mother: The development of an explanatory model

    Frances Marcus Lewis;Mary A. Hammond;Nancy F. Woods

  • Immediate effects of mainstreamed settings on the social interactions and social integration of preschool children.

    Guralnick Mj;Connor Rt;Hammond M;Gottman Jm

  • Developmental changes in maternal interactions with term and preterm infants

    Kathryn E. Barnard;Helen L. Bee;Mary A. Hammond

  • Marital Conflict Management Skills, Parenting Style, and Early‐onset Conduct Problems: Processes and Pathways

    Carolyn Webster-Stratton;Mary Hammond

  • The Peer Relations of Preschool Children with Communication Disorders

    Michael J. Guralnick;Robert T. Connor;Mary A. Hammond;John M. Gottman

  • Enhancing a classroom social competence and problem-solving curriculum by offering parent training to families of moderate- to high-risk elementary school children.

    M. Jamila Reid;Carolyn Webster-Stratton;Mary Hammond

  • The relationship between sources and functions of social support and dimensions of child- and parent-related stress

    Michael J. Guralnick;Mary A. Hammond;Brian Neville;Robert T. Connor

  • The Friendships of Young Children with Developmental Delays: A Longitudinal Analysis

    Michael J. Guralnick;Brian Neville;Mary A. Hammond;Robert T. Connor

  • Stability, change, and correlates of the peer relationships of young children with mild developmental delays.

    Michael J. Guralnick;Mary A. Hammond;Robert T. Connor;Brian Neville

  • The Father's, Mother's, and Adolescent's Functioning with Breast Cancer

    Frances Marcus Lewis;Mary A. Hammond

  • MESUREMENT AND MEANING OF PARENT–CHILD INTERACTION

    Kathryn E. Barnard;Mary A. Hammond;Cathryn L. Booth;Helen L. Bee

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael J. Guralnick
Michael J. Guralnick University of Washington
Carolyn Webster-Stratton
Carolyn Webster-Stratton The Incredible Years
John M. Gottman
John M. Gottman University of Washington
Frances Marcus Lewis
Frances Marcus Lewis University of Washington
Bettye M. Caldwell
Bettye M. Caldwell University of Arkansas at Little Rock
Joy D. Osofsky
Joy D. Osofsky Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans
Robert H. Bradley
Robert H. Bradley Arizona State University
Craig T. Ramey
Craig T. Ramey Virginia Tech
Linda S. Siegel
Linda S. Siegel University of British Columbia
Allen W. Gottfried
Allen W. Gottfried California State University, Fullerton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens doors to a variety of rewarding careers, including Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT). Many students choose Psychology as a starting point and then pursue specialized MFT certification. Each state has unique pathways and requirements, so it’s essential to understand the specific steps in your desired location.

For example, you can find detailed information about Memphis mft certification requirements if you want to work in Tennessee. Similarly, learn about how to become a marriage and family therapist in Mesa for those interested in Arizona. In Florida, check the guidelines for how to become a marriage and family therapist in Miami. For prospective therapists in Wisconsin, it’s helpful to review the latest Milwaukee mft education requirements.

Many universities now offer flexible online degree options in Psychology and related fields, making it easier to balance your education with other responsibilities. Consider your state’s requirements and available online programs as you plan your pathway toward a fulfilling career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Mary A. Hammond

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles