World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Matthew R. Sanders

Matthew R. Sanders

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 102 573 500 30 30 559 39267

Matthew R. Sanders publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Matthew R. Sanders between 1962 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Matthew R. Sanders published across 65 years, from 1962 to 2026, averaging 9.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 54 publications in 2014. 13 of the 631 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1962 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 54. Peak 54 publications in 2014. 1962: 1 publication 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 2 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 2 publications 1982: 5 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 4 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 9 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 12 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 8 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 10 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 24 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 24 publications 2007: 21 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 24 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 54 publications 2015: 48 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 35 publications 2018: 21 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 11 publications 2026: 2 publications
1962 2026

631 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Matthew R. Sanders: publications per year, 1962 to 2026
Year Publications
1962 1
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 2
1978 1
1979 0
1980 1
1981 2
1982 5
1983 1
1984 4
1985 3
1986 2
1987 4
1988 4
1989 9
1990 6
1991 4
1992 12
1993 7
1994 7
1995 2
1996 8
1997 8
1998 5
1999 6
2000 10
2001 11
2002 12
2003 24
2004 10
2005 13
2006 24
2007 21
2008 14
2009 16
2010 19
2011 24
2012 21
2013 16
2014 54
2015 48
2016 23
2017 35
2018 21
2019 17
2020 10
2021 10
2022 20
2023 20
2024 21
2025 11
2026 2
Total 631
Download as CSV

Matthew R. Sanders publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew R. Sanders sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 551–560 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 559 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16 559
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Matthew R. Sanders D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew R. Sanders sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 102–103 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48 102
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Matthew R. Sanders is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia. Their research spans across multiple disciplines including Psychology, Medicine, and Social Sciences, with a notable focus on Clinical Psychology, Education, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, General Health Professions, and Social Psychology.

Key topics addressed in their work include child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, family and disability support research, early childhood education and development, infant development and preterm care, parental involvement in education, youth development and social support, and maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum.

Their recent publications cover a range of subjects within these fields. Selected works include:

  • Scaling Up Parenting Interventions is Critical for Attaining the Sustainable Development Goals (2021), published in Child Psychiatry & Human Development
  • Policies are Needed to Increase the Reach and Impact of Evidence-Based Parenting Supports: A Call for a Population-Based Approach to Supporting Parents, Children, and Families (2022), published in Child Psychiatry & Human Development
  • The Triple P System of Evidence-Based Parenting Support: Past, Present, and Future Directions (2023), published in Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Matthew R. Sanders include Tianyi Ma, Julie Hodges, Cassandra L. Tellegen, Karen Turner, and Vanessa E. Cobham.

Their research is disseminated through several publication venues, most notably:

  • Journal of Child and Family Studies
  • Children and Youth Services Review
  • Child Psychiatry & Human Development
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review

Best Publications

  • Triple P-Positive Parenting Program: towards an empirically validated multilevel parenting and family support strategy for the prevention of behavior and emotional problems in children.

    Matthew R. Sanders

  • Population-based prevention of child maltreatment: the U.S. Triple p system population trial.

    Ronald J. Prinz;Matthew R. Sanders;Cheri J. Shapiro;Daniel J. Whitaker

  • The triple P-positive parenting program: a comparison of enhanced, standard, and self-directed behavioral family intervention for parents of children with early onset conduct problems.

    Matthew R. Sanders;Carol Markie-Dadds;Lucy A. Tully;William Bor

  • The Triple P-Positive Parenting Program: A systematic review and meta-analysis of a multi-level system of parenting support

    Matthew R. Sanders;James N. Kirby;Cassandra L. Tellegen;Jamin J. Day

  • Triple P-Positive Parenting Program as a Public Health Approach to Strengthening Parenting

    Matthew R. Sanders

  • Investing in Our Children: What We Know and Don't Know About the Costs and Benefits of Early Childhood Interventions

    Lynn A. Karoly;Peter W. Greenwood;Susan M. Sohler Everingham;Jill Hoube

  • The relationship between maternal self‐efficacy and parenting practices: implications for parent training

    M. R. Sanders;M. L. Woolley

  • Development, Evaluation, and Multinational Dissemination of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program

    Matthew R. Sanders

  • Triple P-Positive Parenting Program: A Population Approach to Promoting Competent Parenting.

    Matthew R. Sanders

  • The effects of the Triple P-positive Parenting Program on preschool children with co-occurring disruptive behavior and attentional/hyperactive difficulties.

    William Bor;Matthew R. Sanders;Carol Markie-Dadds

  • Theoretical, Scientific and Clinical Foundations of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program: A Population Approach to the Promotion of Parenting Competence

    Matthew R. Sanders;Carol Markie-Dadds;Karen M. T. Turner

  • Predictors of care‐giver stress in families of preschool‐aged children with developmental disabilities

    Karen M. Plant;Matthew R. Sanders

  • The development and dissemination of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program: a multilevel, evidence-based system of parenting and family support.

    Matthew R. Sanders;Karen M. T. Turner;Carol Markie-Dadds

  • The treatment of recurrent abdominal pain in children: A controlled comparison of cognitive-behavioral family intervention and standard pediatric care.

    Matthew R. Sanders;Ross W. Shepherd;Geoffrey Cleghorn;Hugh Woolford

  • Marital discord and treatment outcome in behavioral treatment of child conduct disorders.

    Mark R. Dadds;Steven Schwartz;Matthew R. Sanders

  • An outcome evaluation of the implementation of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program in Hong Kong.

    Cynthia Leung;Matthew R Sanders;Shirley Leung;Rose Mak

  • Stepping Stones Triple P: An RCT of a Parenting Program with Parents of a Child Diagnosed with an Autism Spectrum Disorder

    Koa Whittingham;Kate Sofronoff;Jeanie Sheffield;Matthew R. Sanders

  • Can skills training prevent relationship problems in at-risk couples? Four-year effects of a behavioral relationship education program.

    W. Kim Halford;Matthew R. Sanders;Brett C. Behrens

  • Does parental attributional retraining and anger management enhance the effects of the triple P-Positive Parenting Program with parents at risk of child maltreatment?

    Matthew R. Sanders;Aileen M. Pidgeon;Fred Gravestock;Mark D. Connors

  • Treatment of depressed mothers with disruptive children: A controlled evaluation of cognitive behavioral family intervention

    Matthew R. Sanders;Margaret McFarland

Frequent Co-Authors

Alina Morawska
Alina Morawska University of Queensland
Rachel Calam
Rachel Calam University of Manchester
Ronald J. Prinz
Ronald J. Prinz University of South Carolina
Kate Sofronoff
Kate Sofronoff University of Queensland
Roslyn N. Boyd
Roslyn N. Boyd University of Queensland
James N. Kirby
James N. Kirby University of Queensland
Mark R. Dadds
Mark R. Dadds University of Sydney
W. Kim Halford
W. Kim Halford University of Queensland
Jan M. Nicholson
Jan M. Nicholson La Trobe University
Kylie Megan Gray
Kylie Megan Gray University of Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA opens doors to a range of online degrees and career pathways in the mental health field. Students can specialize in areas such as counseling, behavioral analysis, and therapy. Online programs are especially attractive for their flexibility and accessibility, making it easier to meet the educational requirements needed for licensure.

Career options include becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), which involves a specific set of steps and certifications. To learn more about these steps in a real-world context, explore how to become a bcba in Winston Salem. For those interested in providing counseling services, it’s important to understand regional licensure requirements. These can vary by location, as seen in the requirements for mental health counselor requirements in Albuquerque, and if you’re considering moving states, you can discover how to become a mental health counselor in Anaheim as well as Anchorage mental health counselor certification requirements.

Choosing the right online degree and understanding state-specific pathways ensures graduates are prepared for a rewarding career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew R. Sanders

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles