World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 42 7624 7113 449 438 173 6405

Alina Morawska publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Alina Morawska between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Alina Morawska published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 9.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2015. 29 of the 207 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2015. 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 6 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 3 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 14 publications
2004 2025

207 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Alina Morawska: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 3
2005 3
2006 5
2007 3
2008 7
2009 8
2010 1
2011 6
2012 4
2013 3
2014 15
2015 20
2016 12
2017 18
2018 12
2019 5
2020 9
2021 18
2022 14
2023 12
2024 15
2025 14
Total 207
Download as CSV

Alina Morawska publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alina Morawska sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 173 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450 173
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Alina Morawska D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alina Morawska sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617 42
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Alina Morawska is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia. Their research primarily engages with social sciences, psychology, and medicine, with significant contributions in clinical psychology, education, sociology and political science, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, and public health, environmental and occupational health.

Their work addresses core topics such as child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, family and disability support research, child development and digital technology, early childhood education and development, infant development and preterm care, parental involvement in education, and the impact of technology on adolescents.

Frequent publication venues for their research include Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, Journal of Child and Family Studies, Child Psychiatry & Human Development, Journal of Pediatric Psychology, and Journal of Child Health Care.

  • The Effects of Gendered Parenting on Child Development Outcomes: A Systematic Review (2020, Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review)
  • Managing Screen Use in the Under-Fives: Recommendations for Parenting Intervention Development (2023, Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review)

Morawska often collaborates with several researchers, with frequent coauthors including Amy E. Mitchell, Divna Haslam, Matthew R. Sanders, Karen Turner, and Carolina González.

Best Publications

  • A cognitive model of binge drinking: the influence of alcohol expectancies and drinking refusal self-efficacy.

    Tian Po S. Oei;A. Morawska

  • Parenting and Family Adjustment Scales (PAFAS): Validation of a Brief Parent-Report Measure for Use in Assessment of Parenting Skills and Family Relationships

    Matthew R. Sanders;Alina Morawska;Divna M. Haslam;Ania Filus

  • Maintenance of treatment gains: a comparison of enhanced, standard, and self-directed Triple P-Positive Parenting Program

    Matthew R. Sanders;William Bor;Alina Morawska

  • Case-Control Study of Early Childhood Caries in Australia

    W.K. Seow;H. Clifford;D. Battistutta;A. Morawska

  • Parenting knowledge and its role in the prediction of dysfunctional parenting and disruptive child behaviour

    Alina Morawska;L. Winter;M. R. Sanders

  • Self-administered behavioral family intervention for parents of toddlers: Part I. Efficacy.

    Alina Morawska;Matthew R. Sanders

  • The Work–Family Conflict Scale (WAFCS): Development and Initial Validation of a Self-report Measure of Work–Family Conflict for Use with Parents

    Divna Haslam;Ania Filus;Alina Morawska;Matthew R Sanders

  • Parenting Gifted and Talented Children: Conceptual and Empirical Foundations

    Alina Morawska;Matthew R. Sanders

  • Who Uses Online Parenting Support? A Cross-Sectional Survey Exploring Australian Parents’ Internet Use for Parenting

    Sabine Baker;Matthew R. Sanders;Alina Morawska

  • Child Adjustment and Parent Efficacy Scale: Development and Initial Validation of a Parent Report Measure

    Alina Morawska;Matthew R Sanders;Divna Haslam;Ania Filus

  • Assessing adherence and factors associated with adherence in young children with asthma

    Scott W. Burgess;Peter D. Sly;Alina Morawska;Sunalene G. Devadason

  • Parenting interventions for childhood chronic illness: A review and recommendations for intervention design and delivery

    Alina Morawska;Rachel Calam;Jennifer Fraser

  • Parenting gifted and talented children: what are the key child behaviour and parenting issues?

    Alina Morawska;Matthew R. Sanders

  • Parental confidence and preferences for communicating with their child about sexuality

    Alina Morawska;Anthony Walsh;Melanie Grabski;Renee Fletcher

  • Is the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program Acceptable to Parents from Culturally Diverse Backgrounds?.

    Alina Morawska;Matthew Sanders;Elizabeth Goadby;Clea Headley

  • A randomized controlled trial evaluating a low-intensity interactive online parenting intervention, Triple P Online Brief, with parents of children with early onset conduct problems.

    Sabine Baker;Matthew R. Sanders;Karen M.T. Turner;Alina Morawska

  • An evaluation of a behavioural parenting intervention for parents of gifted children

    Alina Morawska;Matthew Sanders

  • Evaluation of a brief parenting discussion group for parents of young children

    Alina Morawska;Divna Haslam;Danielle Milne;Matthew R. Sanders

  • Promoting Self-Regulation in Young Children: The Role of Parenting Interventions

    Alina Morawska;Cassandra K. Dittman;Julie C. Rusby

  • Binge drinking in university students: A test of the cognitive model.

    A. Morawska;Tian Po S. Oei

  • Parental Use of Time Out Revisited: A Useful or Harmful Parenting Strategy?.

    Alina Morawska;Matthew Sanders

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew R. Sanders
Matthew R. Sanders University of Queensland
Rachel Calam
Rachel Calam University of Manchester
Kate Sofronoff
Kate Sofronoff University of Queensland
Anja Wittkowski
Anja Wittkowski University of Manchester
Tian P. S. Oei
Tian P. S. Oei University of Queensland
James N. Kirby
James N. Kirby University of Queensland
Ronald J. Prinz
Ronald J. Prinz University of South Carolina
Karen Thorpe
Karen Thorpe University of Queensland
Peter D. Sly
Peter D. Sly University of Queensland
William Bor
William Bor University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring the field of psychology in the USA opens doors to various educational paths and rewarding careers. Online psychology degrees at the undergraduate and graduate level can lead to advanced specialties in counseling and behavioral analysis, with flexible study options suitable for working professionals.

One booming area is applied behavior analysis. To become a board-certified behavior analyst in specific regions, such as meeting the Wichita bcba requirements or fulfilling the Winston Salem bcba requirements, candidates typically need a relevant master’s degree, supervised fieldwork, and passing the BCBA exam.

Another sought-after career is mental health counseling. Education and licensure standards differ by location, as seen in the Albuquerque mental health counselor education requirements and mental health counselor requirements in Anaheim. Most paths require a master’s degree, post-graduate supervised experience, and a licensing exam.

When considering online degrees, be sure to choose programs that meet licensure requirements in your intended state or city. This strategic approach will prepare you for a fulfilling psychology-related career no matter where you are located.

Best Scientists Citing Alina Morawska

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles