World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
4782
World Ranking
12207
National Ranking
4955

Rath Vannithamby publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rath Vannithamby sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 165 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Rath Vannithamby D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rath Vannithamby sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rath Vannithamby is affiliated with Intel in the United States and works primarily in the field of engineering, with a particular focus on electrical and electronic engineering. Their research extends into related subfields such as computational theory and mathematics, computer networks and communications, molecular biology, and aerospace engineering.

Their work covers multiple advanced topics in wireless communication and related technologies, including:

  • Advanced Wireless Communication Techniques
  • Millimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling
  • Microwave Engineering and Waveguides
  • Cellular Automata and Applications
  • Wireless Communication Networks Research
  • Advanced MIMO Systems Optimization
  • DNA and Biological Computing

Vannithamby has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including Ekram Hossain, Petar Popovski, Wan Choi, Erik Liu, and Byonghyo Shim. These partnerships reflect recurring collaborative efforts in publications and conference activities.

Their recent published papers include the following:

  • "Integrating Sensing Into Cellular Systems: Architectural Requirements and Performance Enhancements," 2024, IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine
  • "Multilevel Coding for Achieving Low Latency and Low Outage in mmWave Networks," 2025, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
  • "Updates on IoT Magazine and the Editorial Board," 2021, IEEE Internet of Things Magazine
  • "Technical Program Committee," 2022, 2022 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops)
  • "Technical Program Committee," 2022, ICC 2022 - IEEE International Conference on Communications

Their publications have appeared most frequently in venues such as the IEEE Internet of Things Magazine, the 2022 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops), ICC 2022 - IEEE International Conference on Communications, IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, and IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

Best Publications

  • Dynamic voice over data prioritization for wireless communication networks

    Rath Vannithamby;Long L. Duan;Reza Shahidi;Wanshi Chen

  • Quality of service in WiMAX and LTE networks [Topics in Wireless Communications]

    Mehdi Alasti;Behnam Neekzad;Jie Hui;Rath Vannithamby

  • Adaptive DRX Cycle Length Based on Available Battery Power

    Mustafa Demirhan;Ali Taha Koc;Shweta Shrivastava;Rath Vannithamby

  • Reduced channel quality feedback

    Rath Vannithamby;Shiau-He Shawn Tsai;Wanshi Chen

  • Device Power Saving and Latency Optimization in LTE-A Networks Through DRX Configuration

    Ali T. Koc;Satish C. Jha;Rath Vannithamby;Murat Torlak

  • Smartphone Energy Drain in the Wild: Analysis and Implications

    Xiaomeng Chen;Ning Ding;Abhilash Jindal;Y. Charlie Hu

  • Towards 5G: Applications, Requirements and Candidate Technologies

    Rath Vannithamby;Shilpa Talwar

  • Smartphone Energy Drain in the Wild

    Unknown

  • Random Access Request Extension for an Additional Resource Request

    Mustafa Demirhan;Ali Taha Koc;Shweta Shrivastava;Rath Vannithamby

  • Energy impact of emerging mobile internet applications on LTE networks: issues and solutions

    M. Gupta;S. C. Jha;A. T. Koc;R. Vannithamby

  • Smartphone Background Activities in the Wild: Origin, Energy Drain, and Optimization

    Xiaomeng Chen;Abhilash Jindal;Ning Ding;Yu Charlie Hu

  • Forward link admission control for high-speed data networks

    Reza Shahidi;Wanshi Chen;Rath Vannithamby;Keerthi Govind

  • Method and apparatus for congestion control in high speed wireless packet data networks

    Srinivasan Balasubramanian;Rath Vannithamby;Young C. Yoon

  • Battery level based configuration of a mobile station by a base station

    Mustafa Demirhan;Ali Taha Koc;Shweta Shrivastava;Rath Vannithamby

  • Reduced signaling power headroom feedback

    Ralph Gholmieh;Rath Vannithamby;Thawatt Gopal

  • Low complexity resource allocation with opportunistic feedback over downlink OFDMA networks

    R. Agarwal;V. Majjigi;Zhu Han;R. Vannithamby

  • Dual Connectivity in LTE small cell networks

    Satish C. Jha;Kathiravetpillai Sivanesan;Rath Vannithamby;Ali T. Koc

  • Group resource allocation techniques for ieee 802.16m

    Shweta Shrivastava;Rath Vannithamby

  • Controlling access overload and signaling congestion in M2M networks

    Umesh Phuyal;Ali T Koc;Mo-Han Fong;Rath Vannithamby

  • Design and Deployment of Small Cell Networks

    Alagan Anpalagan;Mehdi Bennis;Rath Vannithamby

  • Optimization of Discontinuous Reception (DRX) for Mobile Internet Applications over LTE

    Satish Chandra Jha;Ali Taha Koç;Rath Vannithamby

Frequent Co-Authors

John M. Cioffi
John M. Cioffi Stanford University
Sheng Zhou
Sheng Zhou Tsinghua University
Hung-Yu Wei
Hung-Yu Wei National Taiwan University
Nageen Himayat
Nageen Himayat Intel (United States)
Zhisheng Niu
Zhisheng Niu Tsinghua University
Alagan Anpalagan
Alagan Anpalagan Toronto Metropolitan University
Carlos Cordeiro
Carlos Cordeiro Intel (United States)
Youn Hyoung Heo
Youn Hyoung Heo Intel (United States)
Mehdi Bennis
Mehdi Bennis University of Oulu

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in Computer Science opens up diverse options, catering to different backgrounds and goals. Flexible programs are increasingly available to help you start or advance your tech career, regardless of where you are.

For those aiming at high-impact roles, consider masters degrees that are worth it. These specialized programs can open the door to leadership positions and cutting-edge fields within Computer Science. If you’re just starting out or looking to switch careers, associates degrees online offer a quick and cost-effective entry point into the tech sector.

Budget is also a big consideration for many students. Researching the cheapest online college can help you minimize student debt without sacrificing quality. Plus, many prospective students worry about meeting strict academic requirements. Fortunately, there are now online graduate schools with low gpa requirements, so more learners have the chance to pursue advanced credentials.

From short associate programs to affordable advanced degrees, today’s online learning landscape makes Computer Science accessible to everyone.

Best Scientists Citing Rath Vannithamby

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles