World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
74
Citations
17304
World Ranking
19481
National Ranking
657

William Bor publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Bor sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 186 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

William Bor D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Bor sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

William Bor is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia. Their research spans multiple fields of study including Medicine, Psychology, and Health Professions, with a focus on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Health, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics related to child and adolescent development and health. These topics include:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Child and Adolescent Health
  • Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
  • Health Disparities and Outcomes
  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Prenatal Substance Exposure Effects
  • Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum

William Bor has contributed papers to a variety of publication venues, with multiple publications in some of these journals. Frequent venues include:

  • Early Intervention in Psychiatry
  • Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
  • International Journal of Public Health
  • BMC Psychiatry
  • Infant Mental Health Journal

Representative recent papers authored or co-authored by William Bor include:

  • "Characteristics and treatment outcomes of children and adolescents accessing treatment in Child and Youth Mental Health Services," 2022, Early Intervention in Psychiatry
  • "Poverty over the early life course and young adult cardio-metabolic risk," 2020, International Journal of Public Health
  • "Does the millennial generation of women experience more mental illness than their mothers?" 2021, BMC Psychiatry
  • "Evaluation of a collaborative group intervention for mothers with moderate to severe perinatal mental illness and their infants in Australia," 2021, Infant Mental Health Journal
  • "Practitioners' Perspective on Metabolic Monitoring of Second-Generation Antipsychotics: Existing Gaps in Knowledge, Barriers to Monitoring, and Strategies," 2022, Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology

William Bor frequently collaborates with several researchers in the field. Notable co-authors include:

  • James G. Scott
  • Jake M. Najman
  • Gail Williams
  • Alexandra Clavarino
  • Christel M. Middeldorp

Best Publications

  • The triple P-positive parenting program: a comparison of enhanced, standard, and self-directed behavioral family intervention for parents of children with early onset conduct problems.

    Matthew R. Sanders;Carol Markie-Dadds;Lucy A. Tully;William Bor

  • Are child and adolescent mental health problems increasing in the 21st century? A systematic review

    William Bor;Angela J Dean;Jacob Najman;Reza Hayatbakhsh

  • Chronicity, severity, and timing of maternal depressive symptoms: Relationships with child outcomes at age 5.

    Patricia A. Brennan;Constance Hammen;Margaret J. Andersen;William Bor

  • The effects of the Triple P-positive Parenting Program on preschool children with co-occurring disruptive behavior and attentional/hyperactive difficulties.

    William Bor;Matthew R. Sanders;Carol Markie-Dadds

  • Mothers' mental illness and child behavior problems: cause-effect association or observation bias?

    Jake M. Najman;Gail M. Williams;Jane Nikles;Sue Spence

  • Bias influencing maternal reports of child behaviour and emotional state

    J. M. Najman;G.M. Williams;J. Nikles;S. Spence

  • Cannabis and Anxiety and Depression in Young Adults: A Large Prospective Study

    Mohammad R. Hayatbakhsh;Jake M. Najman;Konrad Jamrozik;Abdullah A. Mamun

  • Emotional and behavioural antecedents of young adults who screen positive for non-affective psychosis: A 21-year birth cohort study

    J. Welham;J. Scott;George Williams;J. Najman

  • Association Between Cannabis Use and Psychosis-Related Outcomes Using Sibling Pair Analysis in a Cohort of Young Adults

    John McGrath;Joy Welham;James Scott;Daniel Varghese

  • Family Poverty Over the Early Life Course and Recurrent Adolescent and Young Adult Anxiety and Depression: A Longitudinal Study

    Jake M. Najman;Mohammad R. Hayatbakhsh;Alexandra Clavarino;William Bor

  • In utero alcohol exposure and prediction of alcohol disorders in early adulthood: a birth cohort study.

    Rosa Alati;Abdullah Al Mamun;Gail M. Williams;Michael O’Callaghan

  • Psychotic-Like Experiences in Major Depression and Anxiety Disorders: A Population-Based Survey in Young Adults

    Daniel Varghese;James Scott;Joy Welham;William Bor

  • Learning, cognitive, and attentional problems in adolescents born small for gestational age.

    Michael J O'Keeffe;Michael O'Callaghan;Gail M Williams;Jake M Najman

  • Maternal Anxiety and Depression, Poverty and Marital Relationship Factors During Early Childhood as Predictors of Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms in Adolescence

    Susan H. Spence;Jake M. Najman;William Bor;Michael J. O'Callaghan

  • Cohort Profile Update: The Mater-University of Queensland Study of Pregnancy (MUSP)

    Jake M Najman;Rosa Alati;William Bor;Alexandra Clavarino

  • The generational transmission of socioeconomic inequalities in child cognitive development and emotional health

    Jake M Najman;Rosemary Aird;William Bor;Michael O’Callaghan

  • Maintenance of treatment gains: a comparison of enhanced, standard, and self-directed Triple P-Positive Parenting Program

    Matthew R. Sanders;William Bor;Alina Morawska

  • Early adversity and the prospective prediction of depressive and anxiety disorders in adolescents.

    Nicole K. Phillips;Constance L. Hammen;Patricia A. Brennan;Jake M. Najman

  • Child Abuse and Neglect and Cognitive Function at 14 Years of Age: Findings From a Birth Cohort

    Ryan Mills;Rosa Alati;Michael O'Callaghan;Jake M. Najman

  • The Mater-University of Queensland Study of Pregnancy (MUSP)

    J. M. Najman;W. Bor;M. O'callaghan;G. M. Williams

Frequent Co-Authors

Jake M. Najman
Jake M. Najman University of Queensland
Gail M. Williams
Gail M. Williams University of Queensland
Michael O'Callaghan
Michael O'Callaghan University of Queensland
Rosa Alati
Rosa Alati Curtin University
Abdullah Al Mamun
Abdullah Al Mamun University of Queensland
Alexandra Clavarino
Alexandra Clavarino University of Queensland
James G. Scott
James G. Scott QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
John J. McGrath
John J. McGrath Aarhus University
Debbie A. Lawlor
Debbie A. Lawlor University of Bristol
Matthew R. Sanders
Matthew R. Sanders University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths in healthcare. For those interested in patient care without extensive entrance exams, consider nursing schools that don't require teas test. These programs streamline admission for prospective nurses eager to fast-track their entry into the field.

If you’re drawn to the leadership and administrative sides of healthcare, pursuing a degree in healthcare administration can lead to dynamic roles managing hospitals, clinics, or public health organizations. This path is ideal for those who prefer influencing healthcare policy or overseeing operations.

Registered nurses aiming for advanced practice can transition through specialized bridge programs like rn to np, which enable RNs to become nurse practitioners and provide a higher level of patient care with greater autonomy.

Nutrition and wellness is another rapidly growing sector. Earning a online nutrition degrees empowers graduates to work in clinical settings, community health, or private consulting, helping people lead healthier lives through evidence-based dietary guidance.

Best Scientists Citing William Bor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles