World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 63 3083 2839 32 30 351 18940

Guy Bodenmann publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Guy Bodenmann between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Guy Bodenmann published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 11.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2015. 31 of the 414 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2015. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 9 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 18 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 29 publications 2016: 29 publications 2017: 26 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 23 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 18 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 14 publications
1991 2025

414 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Guy Bodenmann: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 2
1993 2
1994 0
1995 4
1996 5
1997 9
1998 2
1999 5
2000 8
2001 9
2002 6
2003 3
2004 7
2005 11
2006 15
2007 14
2008 19
2009 16
2010 12
2011 7
2012 11
2013 18
2014 13
2015 29
2016 29
2017 26
2018 17
2019 23
2020 19
2021 18
2022 15
2023 8
2024 17
2025 14
Total 414
Download as CSV

Guy Bodenmann publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guy Bodenmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 351–360 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 351 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69 351
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Guy Bodenmann D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guy Bodenmann sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248 63
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Guy Bodenmann is affiliated with the University of Zurich in Switzerland. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with a significant focus on Social Psychology and Clinical Psychology. Other subfields of study include Sociology and Political Science, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The main topics covered in their work involve Attachment and Relationship Dynamics, Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development, Family Support in Illness, Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum, Family Dynamics and Relationships, Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology, as well as Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior.

Guy Bodenmann has published numerous papers in a variety of journals. Some recent notable publications include:

  • Coping with global uncertainty: Perceptions of COVID-19 psychological distress, relationship quality, and dyadic coping for romantic partners across 27 countries (2021), Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
  • Interventions for Couples (2020), Annual Review of Clinical Psychology
  • Stress, dyadic coping, and relationship satisfaction: A longitudinal study disentangling timely stable from yearly fluctuations (2020), PLoS ONE
  • Dyadic Coping in Couples Facing Chronic Physical Illness: A Systematic Review (2021), Frontiers in Psychology
  • Global Perspective on Marital Satisfaction (2020), Sustainability

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Bodenmann have included Katharina Weitkamp, Ashley K. Randall, Selina A. Landolt, Fridtjof W. Nußbeck, and Michelle Roth.

Common publication venues for their work include Frontiers in Psychology, Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, PsycTESTS Dataset, PLoS ONE, and Journal of Family Psychology.

Bodenmann has also contributed to several book publications, particularly with Hogrefe AG eBooks and Hogrefe Verlag. Titles published include Klassische Lerntheorien (2023), Schatten über der Partnerschaft (2022), and Gewalt bei Paaren (2024).

Best Publications

  • Dyadic Coping and Its Significance for Marital Functioning.

    Guy Bodenmann

  • Intranasal Oxytocin Increases Positive Communication and Reduces Cortisol Levels During Couple Conflict

    Beate Ditzen;Beate Ditzen;Marcel Schaer;Barbara Gabriel;Guy Bodenmann

  • The role of stress on close relationships and marital satisfaction.

    Ashley K. Randall;Guy Bodenmann

  • Effects of different kinds of couple interaction on cortisol and heart rate responses to stress in women

    Beate Ditzen;Inga D. Neumann;Guy Bodenmann;Bernadette von Dawans

  • A systemic-transactional conceptualization of stress and coping in couples

    Guy Bodenmann

  • Stress und Coping bei Paaren

    Guy Bodenmann

  • The Relationship Between Dyadic Coping and Marital Quality: A 2-Year Longitudinal Study

    Guy Bodenmann;Sandrine Pihet;Karen Kayser

  • Dyadic coping and relationship satisfaction: A meta-analysis

    Mariana Karin Falconier;Jeffrey B Jackson;Peter Hilpert;Guy Bodenmann

  • The Couples Coping Enhancement Training (CCET): A new approach to prevention of marital distress based upon stress and coping*

    Guy Bodenmann;S. D. Shantinath

  • Dyadic coping: a systemic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings

    Guy Bodenmann

  • Stress, sex, and satisfaction in marriage

    Guy Bodenmann;Thomas Ledermann;Thomas N. Bradbury

  • Dyadic coping and relationship functioning in couples coping with cancer: a systematic review.

    Marjan J. Traa;Jolanda De Vries;Guy Bodenmann;Brenda L. Den Oudsten

  • Couples Coping With Stress: Emerging Perspectives On Dyadic Coping

    Tracey A. Revenson;Karen Kayser;Guy Bodenmann

  • Stress, Communication, and Marital Quality in Couples

    Thomas Ledermann;Guy Bodenmann;Myriam Rudaz;Thomas N. Bradbury

  • The efficacy of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program in improving parenting and child behavior: A comparison with two other treatment conditions

    Guy Bodenmann;Annette Cina;Thomas Ledermann;Matthew R. Sanders

  • Two Conceptualizations of Dyadic Coping and Their Potential for Predicting Relationship Quality and Individual Well-Being A Comparison

    Guy Bodenmann;Nathalie Meuwly;Karen Kayser

  • Effects of coping-oriented couples therapy on depression: a randomized clinical trial

    Guy Bodenmann;Bernard Plancherel;Steven R. H. Beach;Kathrin Widmer

  • Stress from daily hassles in couples: its effects on intradyadic stress, relationship satisfaction, and physical and psychological well-being.

    Mariana K. Falconier;Fridtjof W. Nussbeck;Guy Bodenmann;Hulka Schneider

  • Stress, anger, and verbal aggression in intimate relationships: Moderating effects of individual and dyadic coping

    Guy Bodenmann;Nathalie Meuwly;Thomas N. Bradbury;Simone Gmelch

  • Stress and its associations with relationship satisfaction

    Ashley K Randall;Guy Bodenmann

  • Family Stress. - 2. Aufl.

    Shelby Messerschmitt-Coen;Ashley K Randall;Guy Bodenmann;Marc Gellman

Frequent Co-Authors

Ashley K. Randall
Ashley K. Randall Arizona State University
Fridtjof W. Nussbeck
Fridtjof W. Nussbeck Bielefeld University
Thomas N. Bradbury
Thomas N. Bradbury University of California, Los Angeles
Markus Heinrichs
Markus Heinrichs University of Freiburg
Ulrike Ehlert
Ulrike Ehlert University of Zurich
Kurt Hahlweg
Kurt Hahlweg Technische Universität Braunschweig
Agnieszka Sorokowska
Agnieszka Sorokowska University of Wrocław
Marina Butovskaya
Marina Butovskaya Institute of Ethnology and Anthropology
Mike Martin
Mike Martin University of Zurich
Veronika Brandstätter
Veronika Brandstätter University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology and counseling degrees provides a flexible option for those balancing work or family commitments while aiming for a respected qualification. Many accredited universities now offer online programs that mirror the rigor and quality of in-person courses, opening the door to diverse career options such as clinical counseling, school psychology, or marriage and family therapy.

Cost is a significant factor for many students. Fortunately, there are programs with lower tuition rates to help reduce student debt. For example, those looking in Massachusetts can review the cheapest counseling degrees in Boston. If you reside on the West Coast, the most affordable counseling degree programs in California offer strong options. Students in the Midwest should consider the cheapest counseling programs in Chicago, while those in the Rockies may benefit from the cheapest counseling programs in Colorado.

These affordable online degrees can lead to meaningful careers in counseling, social services, mental health, and more, helping students gain vital skills while managing their education costs.

Best Scientists Citing Guy Bodenmann

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles