World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
55
Citations
9657
World Ranking
4444
National Ranking
42

Mike Martin publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mike Martin sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 206 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mike Martin D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mike Martin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mike Martin is affiliated with the University of Zurich in Switzerland. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Social Sciences, with a significant focus on Health, Social Psychology, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

Their work frequently addresses topics such as Health disparities and outcomes, Aging and Gerontology Research, Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Attachment and Relationship Dynamics, Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction, Urban Transport and Accessibility, and Language, Discourse, and Communication Strategies.

Among the recent papers authored or coauthored by Mike Martin are:

  • WHO's report for the decade of healthy ageing 2021-30 sets the stage for globally comparable data on healthy ageing (2021) - The Lancet Healthy Longevity
  • Stereotyping in the digital age: Male language is "ingenious", female language is "beautiful" - and popular (2020) - PLoS ONE
  • Longitudinal Within-Person Associations Between Quality of Social Relations, Structure of Social Relations, and Cognitive Functioning in Older Age (2021) - The Journals of Gerontology Series B
  • Social Reminiscence in Older Adults' Everyday Conversations: Automated Detection Using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning (2020) - Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Motivation and Healthy Aging: A Heuristic Model (2021) - The Journals of Gerontology Series B

Mike Martin has collaborated frequently with the following co-authors:

  • Minxia Luo (12 publications)
  • Christina Röcke (10 publications)
  • Andrea B. Horn (8 publications)
  • Burcu Demiray (8 publications)
  • Tabea Meier (6 publications)

Their publications appear regularly in venues such as:

  • Innovation in Aging (8 publications)
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series B (4 publications)
  • Frontiers in Psychology (4 publications)
  • PLoS ONE (2 publications)
  • The APPEA Journal (2 publications)

Best Publications

  • Cognition-based interventions for healthy older people and people with mild cognitive impairment.

    Mike Martin;Linda Clare;Anne Mareike Altgassen;Michelle H Cameron

  • Medication adherence in rheumatoid arthritis patients: older is wiser.

    Denise C. Park;Christopher Hertzog;Howard Leventhal;Roger W. Morrell

  • Complex prospective memory and executive control of working memory: A process model.

    Matthias Kliegel;Mike Martin;Mark A. McDaniel;Gilles O. Einstein

  • Varying the importance of a prospective memory task: Differential effects across time - and event-based prospective memory

    Matthias Kliegel;Mike Martin;Mark A. McDaniel;Gilles O. Einstein

  • The involvement of executive functions in prospective memory performance of adults

    Mike Martin;Matthias Kliegel;Mark A. McDaniel

  • Importance effects on performance in event-based prospective memory tasks.

    Matthias Kliegel;Mike Martin;Mark A. McDaniel;Gilles O. Einstein

  • Brain structure and cognitive ability in healthy aging: a review on longitudinal correlated change.

    Jessica Oschwald;Sabrina Guye;Franziskus Liem;Philippe Rast

  • Dementia caregiving in spousal relationships: a dyadic perspective.

    Melanie Braun;Urte Scholz;Barbara Bailey;Sonja Perren

  • Prospective memory research: Why is it relevant?

    Matthias Kliegel;Mike Martin

  • Standard set of health outcome measures for older persons

    Asangaedem Akpan;Charlotte Roberts;Karen Bandeen-Roche;Barbara Batty

  • Effects of simultaneously performed cognitive and physical training in older adults.

    Nathan Theill;Vera Schumacher;Vera Schumacher;Rolf Adelsberger;Mike Martin

  • Adherence to Antihypertensive Medications Across the Life Span

    Roger W. Morrell;Denise C. Park;Daniel P. Kidder;Mike Martin

  • Adult aging and prospective memory: The importance of ecological validity

    Louise H. Phillips;Julie D. Henry;Mike Martin

  • Forgivingness and subjective well-being in adulthood: the moderating role of future time perspective

    Mathias Allemand;Patrick L. Hill;Pearl Ghaemmaghami;Mike Martin

  • Can longitudinal changes in processing speed explain longitudinal age changes in fluid intelligence

    Daniel Zimprich;Mike Martin

  • Age Differences in Stress, Social Resources, and Well-Being in Middle and Older Age

    Mike Martin;Martin Grünendahl;Peter Martin

  • Proximal and Distal Influences on Development: The Model of Developmental Adaptation☆

    Peter Martin;Mike Martin

  • Personality Traits and Relationship Satisfaction in Intimate Couples: Three Perspectives on Personality:

    Kathrin Schaffhuser;Mathias Allemand;Mike Martin

  • Intraindividual variability, change, and aging: Conceptual and analytical issues

    Mike Martin;Scott M. Hofer

  • Long-term correlated change in personality traits in old age.

    Mathias Allemand;Daniel Zimprich;Mike Martin

  • Ask and ye shall receive : Behavioural specificity in the accuracy of subjective memory complaints

    Christopher Hertzog;Denise C. Park;Roger W. Morrell;Mike Martin

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthias Kliegel
Matthias Kliegel University of Geneva
Daniel Zimprich
Daniel Zimprich University of Ulm
Mathias Allemand
Mathias Allemand University of Zurich
Lutz Jäncke
Lutz Jäncke University of Zurich
Urte Scholz
Urte Scholz University of Zurich
Guy Bodenmann
Guy Bodenmann University of Zurich
Mark A. McDaniel
Mark A. McDaniel Washington University in St. Louis
Matthias R. Mehl
Matthias R. Mehl University of Arizona
Hans-Werner Wahl
Hans-Werner Wahl Heidelberg University
Denise C. Park
Denise C. Park The University of Texas at Dallas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens the door to a wide range of rewarding careers. One popular pathway is becoming a speech-language pathologist (SLP), a specialist who diagnoses and treats communication disorders. Psychology students can pursue this specialized field through advanced study, licensure, and practical training.

Requirements for SLPs vary by state. For example, those interested in becoming a speech therapist in Oregon or how to become a speech language pathologist in Pennsylvania will find differences in educational prerequisites, supervised clinical hours, and certification exams. Similarly, becoming a speech therapist in Rhode Island and understanding slp requirements in South Carolina requires careful planning to meet state-specific criteria.

Many universities offer online psychology and communication sciences programs, making it easier to get started on these in-demand career paths. Research each state's regulations to ensure your chosen program aligns with your licensing goals, and consider volunteering or gaining practical experience alongside your studies.

Best Scientists Citing Mike Martin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles