What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Law
- World War II
- Politics
His scientific interests lie mostly in Politics, Political economy, Voting, Public administration and Public relations.
Many of his research projects under Politics are closely connected to Survey data collection with Survey data collection, tying the diverse disciplines of science together.
Ian McAllister has researched Political economy in several fields, including General election, Legislature, Instant-runoff voting and Public economics.
His research in Voting intersects with topics in Economic system, Political socialization and Political culture.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Competition, Victory, Ranked voting system, Immigration and Refugee in addition to Public administration.
His work deals with themes such as Bibliometrics, Advertising and Portfolio, which intersect with Public relations.
His most cited work include:
- Gender Differences in Religion: A Test of the Structural Location Theory (265 citations)
- How Russia Votes (234 citations)
- The Personalization of Politics (227 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Politics, Political economy, Public administration, Voting and Law are his primary areas of study.
His Politics research includes elements of Government and Gender studies.
His study in Political economy is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Turnout, Democratization, Voting behavior, Development economics and Immigration.
His Public administration study incorporates themes from Federal election and Ranked voting system.
Much of his study explores Voting relationship to General election.
His Public opinion study frequently draws parallels with other fields, such as Public relations.
He most often published in these fields:
- Politics (38.93%)
- Political economy (30.53%)
- Public administration (22.39%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2012-2021)?
- Politics (38.93%)
- Political economy (30.53%)
- Voting (16.79%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Politics, Political economy, Voting, Public opinion and Public administration.
The subject of his Politics research is within the realm of Law.
Ian McAllister combines subjects such as Communism, Democracy, Democratization, Alliance and Social science with his study of Political economy.
As part of the same scientific family, Ian McAllister usually focuses on Voting, concentrating on Financial economics and intersecting with Asset.
The concepts of his Public opinion study are interwoven with issues in Foreign policy and China.
Ian McAllister regularly links together related areas like Context in his Public administration studies.
Between 2012 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Normalising or Equalising Party Competition? Assessing the Impact of the Web on Election Campaigning (70 citations)
- Random Walk or Planned Excursion? Continuity and Change in the Left–Right Positions of Political Parties: (61 citations)
- Did Russia (Nearly) have a Facebook Revolution in 2011? Social Media's Challenge to Authoritarianism (28 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- World War II
- Law
- Politics
Ian McAllister spends much of his time researching Politics, Political economy, Voting, Law and Public relations.
Political socialization is the focus of his Politics research.
His Political economy research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Social science, Democratic consolidation, National identity and Democracy.
His study in the field of Disapproval voting also crosses realms of Ecological analysis.
His Public relations research is multidisciplinary, relying on both National election, The Internet, Liberalization, Public opinion and Government regulation.
His Government research integrates issues from Malpractice, Communism, Mass media, Public administration and Electoral integrity.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
