World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
29
Citations
3494
World Ranking
1290
National Ranking
53

Bruce Tranter publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce Tranter sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 189 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Bruce Tranter D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce Tranter sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 29 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bruce Tranter is affiliated with the University of Tasmania in Australia and has contributed extensively to the fields of Social Sciences and Environmental Science. Their work primarily spans Sociology and Political Science, as well as areas related to Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Global and Planetary Change, Health, and Ecology.

The research topics explored by Tranter include Climate Change Communication and Perception, Environmental Education and Sustainability, Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy, Health Disparities and Outcomes, Polar Research and Ecology, Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism, and Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving.

Tranter's recent publications cover a range of social and environmental issues. These include:

  • "In science we trust? Public trust in Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change projections and accepting anthropogenic climate change," 2023, Public Understanding of Science
  • "Loneliness and the cultural, spatial, temporal and generational bases of belonging," 2021, Australian Journal of Psychology
  • "Climate Change Knowledge and Political Identity in Australia," 2021, SAGE Open
  • "Only in Queensland? Coal mines and voting in the 2019 Australian federal election," 2020, Environmental Sociology
  • "House and contents underinsurance: Insights from bushfire-prone Australia," 2022, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction

Frequent co-authors in Tranter's research include Adrian Franklin, Elizabeth Leane, Jonathan Smith, Libby Lester, and Kerrie Foxwell-Norton.

The primary venues where Tranter has published regularly include:

  • Australian Journal of Social Issues
  • Australian Journal of Psychology
  • Public Understanding of Science
  • Antarctic Science
  • Environmental Sociology

Best Publications

  • Scepticism in a changing climate: A cross-national study

    Bruce Tranter;Kate Booth

  • Beyond the 'digital divide' Internet diffusion and inequality in Australia

    Suzanne Willis;Bruce Tranter

  • Political divisions over climate change and environmental issues in Australia

    Bruce Tranter

  • Dementia Knowledge Assessment Scale: Development and Preliminary Psychometric Properties.

    Michael J. Annear;Christine M. Toye;Christine M. Toye;Claire E. Eccleston;Frances J. McInerney

  • General practitioners’ attitudes toward complementary therapies

    G Easthope;BK Tranter;GF Gill

  • Expecting the unexpected Young people's expectations about marriage and family

    Zlatko Skrbis;Mark Western;Bruce Keith Tranter;David Hogan

  • Neoliberalism, inequality and politics: The changing face of Australia

    Mark C. Western;Janeen H. Baxter;J Pakulski;Bruce Tranter

  • The Great Divide: political candidate and voter polarisation over Global Warming in Australia

    Bruce Tranter

  • Civic, national and denizen identity in Australia

    Jan Pakulski;Bruce Tranter

  • Colonial and post-colonial aspects of Australian identity.

    Bruce Tranter;Jed Donoghue

  • What should we know about dementia in the 21st century? A Delphi consensus study.

    Michael J Annear;Christine M Toye;Frances J McInerney;Claire E A Eccleston

  • Normal medical practice of referring patients for complementary therapies among Australian general practitioners.

    G Easthope;B Tranter;Gerard Gill

  • Acupuncture in Australian General Practice: Patient Characteristics

    Gary Easthope;Gerard F. Gill;Justin J. Beilby;Bruce K. Tranter

  • Home Visits: Transnationalism among Australian Migrants

    Martin O'Flaherty;Zlatko Skrbis;Bruce Tranter

  • The influence of political leaders on climate change attitudes

    Thad Kousser;Bruce Tranter

  • The Dynamics of Environmental Issues in Australia: Concerns, Clusters and Carriers

    Jan Pakulski;Bruce Tranter;Stephen Crook

  • The social bases of environmentalism in Australia

    Bruce Tranter

  • Towards an understanding of loneliness among Australian men: Gender cultures, embodied expression and the social bases of belonging:

    Adrian Franklin;Barbara Barbosa Neves;Nicholas Hookway;Roger Patulny

  • A New Standard in Dementia Knowledge Measurement: Comparative Validation of the Dementia Knowledge Assessment Scale and the Alzheimer's Disease Knowledge Scale.

    Michael J. Annear;Claire E. Eccleston;Frances J. McInerney;Kate Ellen J. Elliott

  • When disaster strikes: Under-insurance in Australian households

    Kate Booth;Bruce Tranter

  • Environmental activists and non-active environmentalists in Australia

    Bruce Tranter

  • Social and political influences on environmentalism in Australia

    Bruce Tranter

  • It’s only natural: conservatives and climate change in Australia

    Bruce Tranter

  • Environmentalism and Social Differentiation A paper in memory of Steve Crook

    Jan Pakulski;Bruce Tranter

  • Paying for Environmental Protection in a Cross-national Perspective

    Galina Ivanova;Bruce Tranter

  • Bushrangers: Ned Kelly and Australian identity:

    Bruce Tranter;Jed Donoghue

  • Postmaterial Values and Age: The Case of Australia

    Bruce Tranter;Mark Western

Frequent Co-Authors

Rowland Atkinson
Rowland Atkinson University of Sheffield
Janeen Baxter
Janeen Baxter University of Queensland
Thad Kousser
Thad Kousser University of California, San Diego
Belinda Hewitt
Belinda Hewitt University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Political Science opens doors to diverse academic routes and career options. Many students consider earning their degree online to benefit from both flexibility and accessibility. For those seeking to advance quickly, the quickest masters degree pathways can help you enter the workforce or achieve your career goals faster.

Cost is a major consideration when choosing a program. Prospective students should look for an affordable online college to minimize debt and maximize return on investment. Many respected institutions offer economical options for online learners in Political Science and related fields.

Graduates can pursue roles in government, policy, or advocacy, and a background in Political Science even connects with emerging fields such as environmental policy. Insights from jobs with elementary education and environmental science degree salaries show the broad range of salaries and opportunities available in interdisciplinary careers.

Additionally, skills gained in Political Science are valuable in data-driven areas. Those interested in quantitative careers can benefit from online bachelor degree mathematics programs, which complement the analytical aspects of the field.

Best Scientists Citing Bruce Tranter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles