World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
55
Citations
9927
World Ranking
4750
National Ranking
2139

Richard J. Krauzlis publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Krauzlis sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 182 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Richard J. Krauzlis D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard J. Krauzlis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard J. Krauzlis is affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States. Their work predominantly focuses on the field of Neuroscience, with a substantial number of publications contributing to Cognitive Neuroscience and related subfields. Their research covers multiple aspects of neural and sensory functions, particularly in visual perception and processing mechanisms.

The primary areas of study for Krauzlis include:

  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms

They have contributed extensively to journals such as:

  • Journal of Vision (9 publications)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (6 publications)
  • Neuron (3 publications)
  • Current Biology (2 publications)
  • Faculty Opinions - Post-Publication Peer Review of the Biomedical Literature (2 publications)

Richard J. Krauzlis's recent papers include the following:

  • "Combining brain perturbation and neuroimaging in non-human primates," 2021, NeuroImage
  • "A Causal Role for Mouse Superior Colliculus in Visual Perceptual Decision-Making," 2020, Journal of Neuroscience
  • "Midbrain activity shapes high-level visual properties in the primate temporal cortex," 2020, Neuron
  • "What is attention?", 2021, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Cognitive Science
  • "Neuronal modulation in the mouse superior colliculus during covert visual selective attention," 2022, Scientific Reports

Krauzlis frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Leor N. Katz
  • Christian Quaia
  • Lupeng Wang
  • Gongchen Yu

Their research intersects with various subfields of Neuroscience, particularly:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Sensory Systems
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Best Publications

  • Superior Colliculus and Visual Spatial Attention

    Richard J. Krauzlis;Lee P. Lovejoy;Alexandre Zénon

  • Recasting the Smooth Pursuit Eye Movement System

    Richard J. Krauzlis

  • A Neural Mechanism for Microsaccade Generation in the Primate Superior Colliculus

    Ziad M. Hafed;Laurent Goffart;Richard J. Krauzlis

  • Inactivation of primate superior colliculus impairs covert selection of signals for perceptual judgments

    Lee P Lovejoy;Richard J Krauzlis

  • The Control of Voluntary Eye Movements: New Perspectives:

    Richard J. Krauzlis

  • Attention deficits without cortical neuronal deficits

    Alexandre Zénon;Richard J. Krauzlis;Richard J. Krauzlis

  • Manipulating intent: evidence for a causal role of the superior colliculus in target selection.

    Christopher D. Carello;Christopher D. Carello;Richard J. Krauzlis

  • Neuronal control of fixation and fixational eye movements.

    Richard J. Krauzlis;Laurent Goffart;Ziad M. Hafed

  • Shared Motor Error for Multiple Eye Movements

    R. J. Krauzlis;M. A. Basso;R. H. Wurtz

  • Attention as an effect not a cause

    Richard J. Krauzlis;Anil Bollimunta;Fabrice Arcizet;Lupeng Wang

  • Target selection and the superior colliculus: goals, choices and hypotheses.

    Richard J. Krauzlis;Dorion Liston;Christopher D. Carello

  • Discharge properties of neurons in the rostral superior colliculus of the monkey during smooth-pursuit eye movements.

    Richard J. Krauzlis;Michele A. Basso;Robert H. Wurtz

  • Microsaccadic Suppression of Visual Bursts in the Primate Superior Colliculus

    Ziad M. Hafed;Richard J. Krauzlis

  • Neural correlates of target choice for pursuit and saccades in the primate superior colliculus.

    Richard J. Krauzlis;Natalie Dill

  • A model of visually-guided smooth pursuit eye movements based on behavioral observations.

    Richard J. Krauzlis;Stephen G. Lisberger

  • Similarity of superior colliculus involvement in microsaccade and saccade generation

    Ziad M. Hafed;Richard J. Krauzlis;Richard J. Krauzlis

  • Tracking with the mind's eye.

    Richard J Krauzlis;Leland S Stone

  • Release of Fixation for Pursuit and Saccades in Humans: Evidence for Shared Inputs Acting on Different Neural Substrates

    R. J. Krauzlis;F. A. Miles

  • Modulation of Microsaccades in Monkey during a Covert Visual Attention Task

    Ziad M. Hafed;Lee P. Lovejoy;Richard J. Krauzlis

  • Temporal properties of visual motion signals for the initiation of smooth pursuit eye movements in monkeys

    R. J. Krauzlis;S. G. Lisberger

  • Effect of changing feedback delay on spontaneous oscillations in smooth pursuit eye movements of monkeys

    D. Goldreich;R. J. Krauzlis;S. G. Lisberger

Frequent Co-Authors

Ziad M. Hafed
Ziad M. Hafed University of Tübingen
James P. Herman
James P. Herman University of Cincinnati
David A. Leopold
David A. Leopold National Institutes of Health
Stephen G. Lisberger
Stephen G. Lisberger Duke University
Robert H. Wurtz
Robert H. Wurtz National Institutes of Health
Michele A. Basso
Michele A. Basso University of California, Los Angeles
Frederick A. Miles
Frederick A. Miles National Institutes of Health
Charles R. Gerfen
Charles R. Gerfen National Institutes of Health
Terrence J. Sejnowski
Terrence J. Sejnowski Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Miguel P. Eckstein
Miguel P. Eckstein University of California, Santa Barbara

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience in the USA opens the door to various allied fields and accessible online education options. Students interested in serving communities or working in mental health might consider an accelerated masters in social work program, which allows for faster entry into clinical practice. For those seeking a flexible route into behavioral sciences, pursuing an online psychology degree can provide foundational knowledge and broaden career opportunities.

If your interests lie in counseling, it's crucial to choose programs recognized by industry standards. The most reputable are cacrep schools, which offer accredited education pathways for professional counselors. For affordability and flexibility, consider schools listed among the online clinical mental health counseling degree options. These related online degrees not only complement Neuroscience education but also equip graduates for specialized roles in healthcare, research, and therapy.

Best Scientists Citing Richard J. Krauzlis

Trending Scientists