World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
6097
World Ranking
9474
National Ranking
446

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
6345
World Ranking
8754
National Ranking
736

Martin Rolfs publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Rolfs sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 171 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Martin Rolfs D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Rolfs sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martin Rolfs is a researcher affiliated with Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin in Germany, specializing in the field of neuroscience with a particular focus on cognitive neuroscience. Their research covers a wide range of topics primarily related to visual perception and processing mechanisms, as well as neural dynamics and brain function.

The scientist's work explores mechanisms underlying visual attention, gaze tracking, and assistive technology, with substantial contributions to understanding how brain activity supports visual and behavioral processes. Their research also intersects with human-computer interaction and ophthalmology, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to studying perception and cognition.

Among the main topics addressed in their publications are:

  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neural and behavioral psychology studies
  • Gaze tracking and assistive technology
  • Visual attention and saliency detection
  • EEG and brain-computer interfaces
  • Retinal development and disorders

Significant recent papers authored or coauthored by Martin Rolfs include:

  • "Coupling perception to action through incidental sensory consequences of motor behaviour" (2022) published in Nature Reviews Psychology
  • "Memory for action: a functional view of selection in visual working memory" (2020) published in Visual Cognition
  • "Foveal vision anticipates defining features of eye movement targets" (2022) published in eLife
  • "The peripheral sensitivity profile at the saccade target reshapes during saccade preparation" (2021) published in Cortex
  • "Intra-saccadic motion streaks as cues to linking object locations across saccades" (2020) published in Journal of Vision

Martin Rolfs frequently collaborates with a group of coauthors with whom they have published multiple papers, including:

  • Sven Ohl
  • Richard Schweitzer
  • Lisa M. Kroell
  • Jan-Nikolas Klanke
  • Nicolas Roth

Their research has appeared in well-known academic venues, reflecting a broad engagement with key journals in vision science and neuroscience. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Vision
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • eLife
  • Cognition
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

The scientist's research output spans over 145 publications in neuroscience, with a strong focus on cognitive neuroscience. Additional subfield interests include human-computer interaction, computer vision and pattern recognition, ophthalmology, and social psychology.

Best Publications

  • Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading

    Reinhold Kliegl;Ellen Grabner;Martin Rolfs;Ralf Engbert

  • Microsaccades: Small steps on a long way

    Martin Rolfs;Martin Rolfs

  • Visual stability based on remapping of attention pointers

    Patrick Cavanagh;Patrick Cavanagh;Amelia R. Hunt;Amelia R. Hunt;Arash Afraz;Arash Afraz;Martin Rolfs

  • Predictive remapping of attention across eye movements

    Martin Rolfs;Martin Rolfs;Donatas Jonikaitis;Heiner Deubel;Patrick Cavanagh

  • Toward a model of microsaccade generation: The case of microsaccadic inhibition

    Martin Rolfs;Reinhold Kliegl;Ralf Engbert

  • Rapid simultaneous enhancement of visual sensitivity and perceived contrast during saccade preparation.

    Martin Rolfs;Marisa Carrasco

  • Visual Adaptation of the Perception of Causality

    Martin Rolfs;Michael Dambacher;Michael Dambacher;Patrick Cavanagh

  • Twin surrogates to test for complex synchronisation

    Marco Thiel;Maria Carmen Romano;Jürgen Kurths;Martin Rolfs

  • Allocation of attention across saccades

    Donatas Jonikaitis;Martin Szinte;Martin Szinte;Martin Rolfs;Martin Rolfs;Patrick Cavanagh

  • Post-saccadic location judgments reveal remapping of saccade targets to non-foveal locations

    Thérèse Collins;Martin Rolfs;Heiner Deubel;Patrick Cavanagh

  • Crossmodal coupling of oculomotor control and spatial attention in vision and audition

    Martin Rolfs;Ralf Engbert;Reinhold Kliegl

  • Shortening and prolongation of saccade latencies following microsaccades

    Martin Rolfs;Jochen Laubrock;Reinhold Kliegl

  • The reference frame of the tilt aftereffect.

    Tomas Knapen;Martin Rolfs;Mark Wexler;Patrick Cavanagh

  • Attention in Active Vision: A Perspective on Perceptual Continuity Across Saccades

    Martin Rolfs

  • The reference frame of the motion aftereffect is retinotopic

    Tomas Knapen;Martin Rolfs;Patrick Cavanagh

  • Microsaccades are an index of covert attention: commentary on Horowitz, Fine, Fencsik, Yurgenson, and Wolfe (2007).

    Jochen Laubrock;Ralf Engbert;Martin Rolfs;Reinhold Kliegl

  • Event-Related Potentials Reveal Rapid Verification of Predicted Visual Input

    Michael Dambacher;Michael Dambacher;Martin Rolfs;Martin Rolfs;Kristin Göllner;Reinhold Kliegl

  • Microsaccade Orientation Supports Attentional Enhancement Opposite a Peripheral Cue Commentary on Tse, Sheinberg, and Logothetis (2003)

    Martin Rolfs;Ralf Engbert;Reinhold Kliegl

  • When do microsaccades follow spatial attention

    Jochen Laubrock;Reinhold Kliegl;Martin Rolfs;Martin Rolfs;Ralf Engbert

  • Coupling perception to action through incidental sensory consequences of motor behaviour

    Unknown

  • Adaptive deployment of spatial and feature-based attention before saccades.

    Alex L. White;Martin Rolfs;Marisa Carrasco;Marisa Carrasco

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick Cavanagh
Patrick Cavanagh York University
Reinhold Kliegl
Reinhold Kliegl University of Potsdam
Marisa Carrasco
Marisa Carrasco New York University
Heiner Deubel
Heiner Deubel Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Jürgen Kurths
Jürgen Kurths Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Sebastiaan F. W. Neggers
Sebastiaan F. W. Neggers Utrecht University
W. Pieter Medendorp
W. Pieter Medendorp Radboud University
René S. Kahn
René S. Kahn Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Sohee Park
Sohee Park Vanderbilt University
Deborah A. Kashy
Deborah A. Kashy Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring neuroscientists often explore related online degrees that open doors to diverse career paths in healthcare, counseling, and research. A popular choice is pursuing cacrep accredited programs, which ensures a high-quality, professionally recognized education critical for those interested in clinical practice.

For those drawn to helping others through therapy, an psychology masters online offers the flexibility to advance your knowledge in mental health from anywhere. If marriage and family therapy is your focus, seeking online mft programs accredited by relevant industry bodies provides the credentials needed for licensure and practice.

Additionally, an online master's in counseling is ideal for those who wish to become licensed counselors and work in schools, healthcare institutions, or private practice. Exploring these online pathways is a strategic way to connect neuroscience studies with fulfilling, in-demand careers.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Rolfs

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles