World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9474 8857 446 439 163 6097
Neuroscience 37 8754 8087 736 698 171 6345

Martin Rolfs publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Martin Rolfs between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Martin Rolfs published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 10.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 35 publications in 2025. 56 of the 234 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 35. Peak 35 publications in 2025. 2004: 3 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 19 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 20 publications 2024: 21 publications 2025: 35 publications
2004 2025

234 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Martin Rolfs: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 3
2005 0
2006 5
2007 3
2008 4
2009 7
2010 9
2011 5
2012 4
2013 11
2014 4
2015 7
2016 13
2017 14
2018 10
2019 15
2020 10
2021 19
2022 15
2023 20
2024 21
2025 35
Total 234
Download as CSV

Martin Rolfs publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Rolfs sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 168–177 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 171 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383 171
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Martin Rolfs D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Rolfs sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435 37
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Martin Rolfs is a researcher affiliated with Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin in Germany, specializing in the field of neuroscience with a particular focus on cognitive neuroscience. Their research covers a wide range of topics primarily related to visual perception and processing mechanisms, as well as neural dynamics and brain function.

The scientist's work explores mechanisms underlying visual attention, gaze tracking, and assistive technology, with substantial contributions to understanding how brain activity supports visual and behavioral processes. Their research also intersects with human-computer interaction and ophthalmology, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to studying perception and cognition.

Among the main topics addressed in their publications are:

  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Neural and behavioral psychology studies
  • Gaze tracking and assistive technology
  • Visual attention and saliency detection
  • EEG and brain-computer interfaces
  • Retinal development and disorders

Significant recent papers authored or coauthored by Martin Rolfs include:

  • "Coupling perception to action through incidental sensory consequences of motor behaviour" (2022) published in Nature Reviews Psychology
  • "Memory for action: a functional view of selection in visual working memory" (2020) published in Visual Cognition
  • "Foveal vision anticipates defining features of eye movement targets" (2022) published in eLife
  • "The peripheral sensitivity profile at the saccade target reshapes during saccade preparation" (2021) published in Cortex
  • "Intra-saccadic motion streaks as cues to linking object locations across saccades" (2020) published in Journal of Vision

Martin Rolfs frequently collaborates with a group of coauthors with whom they have published multiple papers, including:

  • Sven Ohl
  • Richard Schweitzer
  • Lisa M. Kroell
  • Jan-Nikolas Klanke
  • Nicolas Roth

Their research has appeared in well-known academic venues, reflecting a broad engagement with key journals in vision science and neuroscience. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Vision
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • eLife
  • Cognition
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

The scientist's research output spans over 145 publications in neuroscience, with a strong focus on cognitive neuroscience. Additional subfield interests include human-computer interaction, computer vision and pattern recognition, ophthalmology, and social psychology.

Best Publications

  • Length, frequency, and predictability effects of words on eye movements in reading

    Reinhold Kliegl;Ellen Grabner;Martin Rolfs;Ralf Engbert

  • Microsaccades: Small steps on a long way

    Martin Rolfs;Martin Rolfs

  • Visual stability based on remapping of attention pointers

    Patrick Cavanagh;Patrick Cavanagh;Amelia R. Hunt;Amelia R. Hunt;Arash Afraz;Arash Afraz;Martin Rolfs

  • Predictive remapping of attention across eye movements

    Martin Rolfs;Martin Rolfs;Donatas Jonikaitis;Heiner Deubel;Patrick Cavanagh

  • Toward a model of microsaccade generation: The case of microsaccadic inhibition

    Martin Rolfs;Reinhold Kliegl;Ralf Engbert

  • Rapid simultaneous enhancement of visual sensitivity and perceived contrast during saccade preparation.

    Martin Rolfs;Marisa Carrasco

  • Visual Adaptation of the Perception of Causality

    Martin Rolfs;Michael Dambacher;Michael Dambacher;Patrick Cavanagh

  • Twin surrogates to test for complex synchronisation

    Marco Thiel;Maria Carmen Romano;Jürgen Kurths;Martin Rolfs

  • Allocation of attention across saccades

    Donatas Jonikaitis;Martin Szinte;Martin Szinte;Martin Rolfs;Martin Rolfs;Patrick Cavanagh

  • Post-saccadic location judgments reveal remapping of saccade targets to non-foveal locations

    Thérèse Collins;Martin Rolfs;Heiner Deubel;Patrick Cavanagh

  • Crossmodal coupling of oculomotor control and spatial attention in vision and audition

    Martin Rolfs;Ralf Engbert;Reinhold Kliegl

  • Shortening and prolongation of saccade latencies following microsaccades

    Martin Rolfs;Jochen Laubrock;Reinhold Kliegl

  • The reference frame of the tilt aftereffect.

    Tomas Knapen;Martin Rolfs;Mark Wexler;Patrick Cavanagh

  • Attention in Active Vision: A Perspective on Perceptual Continuity Across Saccades

    Martin Rolfs

  • The reference frame of the motion aftereffect is retinotopic

    Tomas Knapen;Martin Rolfs;Patrick Cavanagh

  • Microsaccades are an index of covert attention: commentary on Horowitz, Fine, Fencsik, Yurgenson, and Wolfe (2007).

    Jochen Laubrock;Ralf Engbert;Martin Rolfs;Reinhold Kliegl

  • Event-Related Potentials Reveal Rapid Verification of Predicted Visual Input

    Michael Dambacher;Michael Dambacher;Martin Rolfs;Martin Rolfs;Kristin Göllner;Reinhold Kliegl

  • Microsaccade Orientation Supports Attentional Enhancement Opposite a Peripheral Cue Commentary on Tse, Sheinberg, and Logothetis (2003)

    Martin Rolfs;Ralf Engbert;Reinhold Kliegl

  • When do microsaccades follow spatial attention

    Jochen Laubrock;Reinhold Kliegl;Martin Rolfs;Martin Rolfs;Ralf Engbert

  • Coupling perception to action through incidental sensory consequences of motor behaviour

    Unknown

  • Adaptive deployment of spatial and feature-based attention before saccades.

    Alex L. White;Martin Rolfs;Marisa Carrasco;Marisa Carrasco

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick Cavanagh
Patrick Cavanagh York University
Reinhold Kliegl
Reinhold Kliegl University of Potsdam
Marisa Carrasco
Marisa Carrasco New York University
Heiner Deubel
Heiner Deubel Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Jürgen Kurths
Jürgen Kurths Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Sebastiaan F. W. Neggers
Sebastiaan F. W. Neggers Utrecht University
W. Pieter Medendorp
W. Pieter Medendorp Radboud University
René S. Kahn
René S. Kahn Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Sohee Park
Sohee Park Vanderbilt University
Deborah A. Kashy
Deborah A. Kashy Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring neuroscientists often explore related online degrees that open doors to diverse career paths in healthcare, counseling, and research. A popular choice is pursuing cacrep accredited programs, which ensures a high-quality, professionally recognized education critical for those interested in clinical practice.

For those drawn to helping others through therapy, an psychology masters online offers the flexibility to advance your knowledge in mental health from anywhere. If marriage and family therapy is your focus, seeking online mft programs accredited by relevant industry bodies provides the credentials needed for licensure and practice.

Additionally, an online master's in counseling is ideal for those who wish to become licensed counselors and work in schools, healthcare institutions, or private practice. Exploring these online pathways is a strategic way to connect neuroscience studies with fulfilling, in-demand careers.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Rolfs

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles