World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stefan Van der Stigchel

Stefan Van der Stigchel

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 45 6686 6228 302 290 270 8404
Neuroscience 46 6671 6136 183 171 287 8532

Stefan Van der Stigchel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stefan Van der Stigchel between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stefan Van der Stigchel published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 17.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2025. 71 of the 366 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2025. 2005: 4 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 24 publications 2017: 22 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 27 publications 2024: 34 publications 2025: 37 publications
2005 2025

366 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stefan Van der Stigchel: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 4
2006 6
2007 5
2008 8
2009 8
2010 12
2011 11
2012 13
2013 20
2014 17
2015 23
2016 24
2017 22
2018 12
2019 22
2020 22
2021 22
2022 17
2023 27
2024 34
2025 37
Total 366
Download as CSV

Stefan Van der Stigchel publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Van der Stigchel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 278–287 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 287 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125 287
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Stefan Van der Stigchel D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Van der Stigchel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512 46
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Stefan Van der Stigchel is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands and has contributed extensively to the field of neuroscience. Their research spans multiple subfields including cognitive neuroscience, experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, computer vision and pattern recognition, and human-computer interaction.

The primary focus of their work lies within neuroscience and cognitive neuroscience, with topics covering neural and behavioral psychology studies, visual perception and processing mechanisms, neural dynamics and brain function, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, spatial neglect and hemispheric dysfunction, gaze tracking and assistive technology, and multisensory perception and integration.

Stefan Van der Stigchel has published notable papers including:

  • Pupillometry as an integrated readout of distinct attentional networks (2022, Trends in Neurosciences)
  • Low-Level Visual Information Is Maintained across Saccades, Allowing for a Postsaccadic Handoff between Visual Areas (2020, Journal of Neuroscience)
  • An embodied account of visual working memory (2020, Visual Cognition)
  • When the central integrator disintegrates: A review of the role of the thalamus in cognition and dementia (2023, Alzheimer's & Dementia)
  • Attention rhythmically samples multi-feature objects in working memory (2022, Scientific Reports)

Frequently collaborating researchers include Christoph Strauch, Surya Gayet, Marnix Naber, Chris Paffen, and Tanja C.W. Nijboer.

Their work has been published often in venues such as the Journal of Vision, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Scientific Reports, Cortex, and the Journal of Neuroscience.

Best Publications

  • Safe and sensible preprocessing and baseline correction of pupil-size data

    Sebastiaan Mathôt;Sebastiaan Mathôt;Jasper Fabius;Elle Van Heusden;Stefan Van der Stigchel

  • PyGaze: an open-source, cross-platform toolbox for minimal-effort programming of eyetracking experiments

    Edwin S. Dalmaijer;Sebastiaan Mathôt;Stefan Van der Stigchel

  • Faces capture attention: Evidence from inhibition of return

    Jan Theeuwes;Stefan Van der Stigchel

  • Eye movement trajectories and what they tell us

    Stefan Van der Stigchel;Martijn Meeter;Jan Theeuwes

  • A review on eye movement studies in childhood and adolescent psychiatry

    Nanda N.J. Rommelse;Stefan Van der Stigchel;Joseph A. Sergeant

  • Spreading the sparing : against a limited-capacity account of the attentional blink

    Christian N. L. Olivers;Stefan van der Stigchel;Johan Hulleman

  • Breaking continuous flash suppression: competing for consciousness on the pre-semantic battlefield

    Surya Gayet;Stefan Van der Stigchel;Chris L. E. Paffen

  • Pupillometry as an integrated readout of distinct attentional networks

    Unknown

  • New Light on the Mind’s Eye The Pupillary Light Response as Active Vision

    Sebastiaan Mathôt;Stefan Van der Stigchel

  • Examining the influence of task set on eye movements and fixations.

    Mark Mills;Andrew Hollingworth;Stefan Van der Stigchel;Lesa Hoffman

  • The link between motor and cognitive development in children born preterm and/or with low birth weight: A review of current evidence

    Ora Oudgenoeg-Paz;Hanna Mulder;Marian J. Jongmans;Ineke J.M. van der Ham

  • A competitive integration model of exogenous and endogenous eye movements

    Martijn Meeter;Stefan Van der Stigchel;Jan Theeuwes

  • Attentional SNARC: there's something special about numbers (let us count the ways).

    Michael D. Dodd;Stefan Van der Stigchel;M. Adil Leghari;Gery Fung

  • Information Matching the Content of Visual Working Memory Is Prioritized for Conscious Access

    Surya Gayet;Chris L. E. Paffen;Stefan Van der Stigchel

  • The limits of top-down control of visual attention.

    Stefan Van der Stigchel;Artem V. Belopolsky;Judith C. Peters;Judith C. Peters;Jasper G. Wijnen

  • You do not find your own face faster; you just look at it longer

    Christel Devue;Stefan Van der Stigchel;Serge Brédart;Jan Theeuwes

  • Approaching threat modulates visuotactile interactions in peripersonal space

    Alyanne M. de Haan;Miranda Smit;Stefan Van der Stigchel;H. Chris Dijkerman

  • Novelty Is Not Always the Best Policy Inhibition of Return and Facilitation of Return as a Function of Visual Task

    Michael D. Dodd;Stefan Van der Stigchel;Andrew Hollingworth

  • Visuospatial Working Memory as a Fundamental Component of the Eye Movement System

    Stefan Van der Stigchel;Andrew Hollingworth

  • Recent advances in the study of saccade trajectory deviations.

    Stefan Van der Stigchel

  • Relation between saccade trajectories and spatial distractor locations.

    Stefan Van der Stigchel;Jan Theeuwes

  • Early and Late Modulation of Saccade Deviations by Target Distractor Similarity

    Manon Mulckhuyse;Stefan Van der Stigchel;Jan Theeuwes

  • Cueing the location of a distractor: an inhibitory mechanism of spatial attention?

    Jaap Munneke;Stefan Van der Stigchel;Jan Theeuwes

Frequent Co-Authors

Tanja C.W. Nijboer
Tanja C.W. Nijboer Utrecht University
Jan Theeuwes
Jan Theeuwes Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Albert Postma
Albert Postma Utrecht University
H. Chris Dijkerman
H. Chris Dijkerman Utrecht University
Martijn Meeter
Martijn Meeter Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Christian N. L. Olivers
Christian N. L. Olivers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Andrew Hollingworth
Andrew Hollingworth University of Iowa
Ignace T. C. Hooge
Ignace T. C. Hooge Utrecht University
Frans A. J. Verstraten
Frans A. J. Verstraten University of Sydney
John-Dylan Haynes
John-Dylan Haynes Charité - University Medicine Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying neuroscience opens up a wide array of online degree and career options in the USA. Many students interested in the brain and behavior also consider advanced mental health careers. For those seeking to become practicing psychologists, pursuing a psyd psychology online program is a flexible path to gain clinical expertise and licensure.

If you are drawn to therapy and counseling, mft programs (Marriage and Family Therapy) can be completed fully online and prepare you for impactful roles supporting families and couples.

For those eager to fast-track their education, earning an accelerated online bachelor's degree allows you to start your career or graduate studies much sooner.

Finally, students curious about financial prospects can explore the highest paying majors to make informed decisions about their future. Neuroscience and related fields provide diverse online pathways and rewarding career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Stefan Van der Stigchel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles