World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Tanja C.W. Nijboer

Tanja C.W. Nijboer

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9639 9019 423 409 167 3866

Tanja C.W. Nijboer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tanja C.W. Nijboer between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tanja C.W. Nijboer published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 8 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2019. 19 of the 224 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2019. 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 16 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 10 publications
1998 2025

224 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tanja C.W. Nijboer: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 2
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 0
2006 2
2007 4
2008 5
2009 7
2010 7
2011 7
2012 10
2013 16
2014 15
2015 14
2016 13
2017 19
2018 9
2019 20
2020 18
2021 14
2022 7
2023 16
2024 9
2025 10
Total 224
Download as CSV

Tanja C.W. Nijboer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tanja C.W. Nijboer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 167 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 167
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Tanja C.W. Nijboer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tanja C.W. Nijboer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Tanja C.W. Nijboer is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their research spans multiple domains within neuroscience and medicine, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience, neurology, psychiatry and mental health, epidemiology, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Their work covers various topics, including:

  • Spatial neglect and hemispheric dysfunction
  • Neural and behavioral psychology studies
  • Death, funerary practices, and mourning
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Stroke rehabilitation and recovery
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • EEG and brain-computer interfaces

Tanja C.W. Nijboer has contributed to numerous publications, with recent papers including:

  • "An overview of screening instruments for cognition and behavior in patients with ALS: selecting the appropriate tool for clinical practice" (2020), published in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Frontotemporal Degeneration
  • "Incidence, causes and consequences of moderate and severe traumatic brain injury as determined by Abbreviated Injury Score in the Netherlands" (2021), published in Scientific Reports
  • "Feasibility and user-experience of virtual reality in neuropsychological assessment following stroke" (2020), published in Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
  • "The association between visuospatial neglect and balance and mobility post-stroke onset: A systematic review" (2020), published in Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
  • "Increasing cognitive demand in assessments of visuo-spatial neglect: Testing the concepts of static and dynamic tests" (2020), published in Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology

Frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • Stefan Van der Stigchel
  • A. Hoogerbrugge
  • Isabel K. Gosselt
  • Antonia F. Ten Brink
  • Christoph Strauch

Their publications often appear in journals such as:

  • Journal of Vision
  • Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
  • Cortex
  • Neuropsychological Rehabilitation
  • PLoS ONE

Best Publications

  • Time course of visuospatial neglect early after stroke: a longitudinal cohort study.

    Tanja C. W. Nijboer;Boudewijn J. Kollen;Gert Kwakkel

  • Attended but unseen: Visual attention is not sufficient for visual awareness

    R.W. Kentridge;T.C.W. Nijboer;C.A. Heywood

  • Predicting Functional Outcome after Stroke: The Influence of Neglect on Basic Activities in Daily Living

    Tanja Nijboer;Ingrid van de Port;Vera Schepers;Marcel Post

  • Differences between left- and right-sided neglect revisited: A large cohort study across multiple domains.

    Antonia F. Ten Brink;Jurre H. Verwer;J. Matthijs Biesbroek;Johanna M. A. Visser-Meily

  • Implicit social learning in relation to autistic-like traits.

    Matthew Hudson;Tanja C. W. Nijboer;Tanja C. W. Nijboer;Tjeerd Jellema

  • Return to work after mild-to-moderate stroke: work satisfaction and predictive factors.

    Jet van der Kemp;Willeke J. Kruithof;Tanja C.W. Nijboer;Coen A. M. van Bennekom

  • The global effect: what determines where the eyes land?

    Stefan Van der Stigchel;Tanja C.W. Nijboer

  • CancellationTools: All-in-one software for administration and analysis of cancellation tasks.

    Edwin Stefan Dalmaijer;Stefan Van der Stigchel;Tanja C W Nijboer;Tim Cornelissen

  • Choosing between alternative wrist postures: Action planning needs perception

    H. C. Dijkerman;Robert McIntosh;I. Schindler;T. C. W. Nijboer

  • Multisensory interactions in the depth plane in front and rear space: a review.

    N. Van der Stoep;T.C.W. Nijboer;S. Van der Stigchel;C. Spence

  • Exploring near and far regions of space: Distance- specific visuospatial neglect after stroke

    Nathan Van der Stoep;Johanna M A Visser-Meily;L Jaap Kappelle;Paul L M de Kort

  • Novel insights into the rehabilitation of memory post acquired brain injury: a systematic review.

    Lauriane A. Spreij;Johanna M. A. Visser-Meily;Caroline M. van Heugten;Tanja C. W. Nijboer

  • Prism adaptation improves voluntary but not automatic orienting in neglect

    T. C. W. Nijboer;R. D. McIntosh;G. M. S. Nys;H. C. Dijkerman

  • Macular degeneration affects eye movement behavior during visual search

    Stefan Van der Stigchel;Richard A. I. Bethlehem;Barrie P. Klein;Tos T. J. M. Berendschot

  • Cognitive and behavioural changes in PLS and PMA:challenging the concept of restricted phenotypes

    Bálint S de Vries;Laura M M Rustemeijer;Leonhard A Bakker;Carin D Schröder

  • Impact of visuospatial neglect post-stroke on daily activities, participation and informal caregiver burden: A systematic review.

    Martine S. Bosma;Tanja C.W. Nijboer;Monique A.A. Caljouw;Wilco P. Achterberg

  • Prism adaptation alters spatial remapping in healthy individuals: evidence from double-step saccades.

    Janet H. Bultitude;Janet H. Bultitude;Stefan Van der Stigchel;Tanja C.W. Nijboer

  • Developmental Colour Agnosia

    Martine J.E. van Zandvoort;Martine J.E. van Zandvoort;Tanja C.W. Nijboer;Edward de Haan;Edward de Haan

  • Multiple dimensions in bi-directional synesthesia

    Titia Gebuis;Tanja C. W. Nijboer;Maarten J. Van der Smagt

  • Multisensory Stimulation to Improve Low- and Higher-Level Sensory Deficits after Stroke : A Systematic Review

    Angelica Maria Tinga;Johanna Maria Augusta Visser-Meily;Maarten Jeroen van der Smagt;Stefan Van der Stigchel

  • Repetitive long-term prism adaptation permanently improves the detection of contralesional visual stimuli in a patient with chronic neglect.

    Tanja C.W. Nijboer;Gudrun M.S. Nys;Maarten J. van der Smagt;Stefan van der Stigchel

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefan Van der Stigchel
Stefan Van der Stigchel Utrecht University
Albert Postma
Albert Postma Utrecht University
Edward H.F. de Haan
Edward H.F. de Haan Radboud University
Caroline M. van Heugten
Caroline M. van Heugten Maastricht University
Gert Kwakkel
Gert Kwakkel University of Amsterdam
Leonard H. van den Berg
Leonard H. van den Berg Utrecht University
Dennis J.L.G. Schutter
Dennis J.L.G. Schutter Utrecht University
Yves Rossetti
Yves Rossetti Lyon Neuroscience Research Center
Jan H. Veldink
Jan H. Veldink Utrecht University
Charles Spence
Charles Spence University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology and counseling opens up a range of flexible education and career options across the United States. Many universities now offer accelerated or easier paths to a counseling degree, helping students begin their careers more quickly.

For those seeking an accessible start, consider reviewing easiest online counseling degrees in Virginia. These programs typically feature user-friendly formats, making them ideal for individuals new to online learning.

If speed is a priority, there are online pathways designed to fast-track your education. The fastest online counseling degree programs ranking in California and Florida accelerated counseling degrees online are strong options for those eager to graduate sooner and start working as counseling professionals.

For advanced students, consider the fastest online counseling master's programs in Ohio, which are designed to help you complete graduate-level requirements quickly and efficiently.

With these varied options, aspiring psychologists and counselors can match their career ambitions to programs that fit their timeline and educational preferences, supporting both immediate and long-term professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Tanja C.W. Nijboer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles