World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 104 6961 6548 263 257 377 48552

Gert Kwakkel publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gert Kwakkel between 1996 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gert Kwakkel published across 31 years, from 1996 to 2026, averaging 13.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2006. 8 of the 429 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2006. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 31 publications 2007: 23 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 19 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 28 publications 2015: 28 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 26 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 17 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 7 publications 2026: 1 publication
1996 2026

429 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gert Kwakkel: publications per year, 1996 to 2026
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 1
1998 0
1999 6
2000 5
2001 2
2002 5
2003 2
2004 10
2005 12
2006 31
2007 23
2008 13
2009 21
2010 19
2011 16
2012 17
2013 20
2014 28
2015 28
2016 22
2017 26
2018 17
2019 21
2020 17
2021 17
2022 12
2023 22
2024 7
2025 7
2026 1
Total 429
Download as CSV

Gert Kwakkel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gert Kwakkel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 361–380 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 377 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838 377
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Gert Kwakkel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gert Kwakkel sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 104–105 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513 104
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Gert Kwakkel is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands and has an extensive publication record in the field of medicine, with a focus on rehabilitation and neurology. Their research primarily addresses stroke rehabilitation and recovery, contributing to related areas such as acute ischemic stroke management and cerebral palsy and movement disorders.

Their recent publications span several respected journals and cover various aspects of motor rehabilitation and recovery after stroke. Notable papers include:

  • "Motor rehabilitation after stroke: European Stroke Organisation (ESO) consensus-based definition and guiding framework" (2023), published in European Stroke Journal
  • "Predicting Upper Limb Motor Impairment Recovery after Stroke: A Mixture Model" (2020), published in Annals of Neurology
  • "Consensus-Based Core Set of Outcome Measures for Clinical Motor Rehabilitation After Stroke-A Delphi Study" (2020), published in Frontiers in Neurology

Additional research topics covered relate to neuroanimation experiences in stroke therapy, the effects of rehabilitation time on functional outcomes, and various neurological disorders including botulinum toxin treatments and balance and gait rehabilitation.

Frequent co-authors in their collaborations include Erwin E. H. van Wegen, Carel G. M. Meskers, Rinske Nijland, Ruud W. Selles, and Andreas R. Luft. These collaborations suggest an engagement with a broad network focusing on neurological rehabilitation and clinical outcomes.

Kwakkel's work is regularly published in specialized journals such as:

  • Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
  • Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
  • Frontiers in Neurology
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • Stroke

Their main fields of study encompass:

  • Medicine

With subfields centered on:

  • Rehabilitation
  • Neurology
  • Epidemiology
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Research topics frequently explored in their publications include:

  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
  • Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Musculoskeletal Pain and Rehabilitation
  • Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies

Best Publications

  • Stroke Care 2: Stroke rehabilitation

    Peter Langhorne;Julie Bernhardt;Gert Kwakkel

  • Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy on Upper Limb Recovery After Stroke: A Systematic Review

    Gert Kwakkel;Boudewijn J. Kollen;Hermano I. Krebs

  • Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: Impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke

    Gert Kwakkel;Boudewijn J. Kollen;Jeroen V. Van der Grond;Arie J.H. Prevo

  • Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: The Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable taskforce:

    Julie Bernhardt;Kathryn S Hayward;Kathryn S Hayward;Gert Kwakkel;Gert Kwakkel;Nick S Ward

  • Effects of Augmented Exercise Therapy Time After Stroke A Meta-Analysis

    Gert Kwakkel;Roland van Peppen;Robert C. Wagenaar;Sharon Wood Dauphinee

  • What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

    Janne Marieke Veerbeek;Erwin Eh van Wegen;Roland P.S. van Peppen;Philip Jan van der Wees

  • Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial

    Gert Kwakkel;Robert C. Wagenaar;Jos W.R. Twisk;Gustaaf J. Lankhorst

  • The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence?

    R. P.S. Van Peppen;Gert Kwakkel;S. Wood-Dauphinee;H. J.M. Hendriks

  • Cueing training in the home improves gait-related mobility in Parkinson’s disease: the RESCUE trial

    A. Nieuwboer;G. J. Kwakkel;L. Rochester;D. Jones

  • Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories.

    Gert Kwakkel;Boudewijn Kollen;Eline Lindeman

  • Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis.

    Gert Kwakkel;Robert C. Wagenaar;Tim W. Koelman;Gustaaf J. Lankhorst

  • Exercise therapy for multiple sclerosis

    Marc B. Rietberg;Dina Brooks;Bernard M.J. Uitdehaag;Gert Kwakkel

  • Impact of inspiratory muscle training in patients with COPD: what is the evidence?

    Rik Gosselink;J De Vos;S P van den Heuvel;Johan Segers

  • Predicting Disability in Stroke—A Critical Review of the Literature

    Gert Kwakkel;Robert C. Wagenaar;Boudewijn J. Kollen;Gustaaf J. Lankhorst

  • Impact of time on improvement of outcome after stroke

    Gert Kwakkel;Boudewijn Kollen;Jos Twisk

  • Effects of external rhythmical cueing on gait in patients with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review

    I Lim;E van Wegen;C de Goede;M Deutekom

  • Effects of controlled inspiratory muscle training in patients with COPD: a meta-analysis

    Freek Lötters;B. van Tol;Gert Kwakkel;Rik Gosselink

  • Early Prediction of Outcome of Activities of Daily Living After Stroke A Systematic Review

    Janne M. Veerbeek;Gert Kwakkel;Gert Kwakkel;Erwin E.H. van Wegen;Johannes C.F. Ket

  • Constraint-induced movement therapy after stroke

    Gert Kwakkel;Janne M Veerbeek;Erwin E H van Wegen;Steven L Wolf

  • Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy for the Upper Limb After Stroke

    Janne M. Veerbeek;Anneli C. Langbroek-Amersfoort;Erwin E. H. van Wegen;Erwin E. H. van Wegen;Carel G. M. Meskers

Frequent Co-Authors

Lynn Rochester
Lynn Rochester Newcastle University
Julie Bernhardt
Julie Bernhardt Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health
John W. Krakauer
John W. Krakauer Johns Hopkins University
Jos W. R. Twisk
Jos W. R. Twisk Amsterdam UMC
Raymund A.C. Roos
Raymund A.C. Roos Leiden University Medical Center
Dale Corbett
Dale Corbett University of Ottawa
Nick S. Ward
Nick S. Ward University College London
Alfred C. Schouten
Alfred C. Schouten Delft University of Technology
Tanja C.W. Nijboer
Tanja C.W. Nijboer Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in medicine or healthcare, there are several flexible online programs that can help you advance your career or explore new specialties. Many registered nurses are choosing asn to nurse practitioner programs to bridge from an associate degree in nursing to an advanced practitioner role, greatly expanding career opportunities and clinical responsibilities.

If you’re passionate about promoting wellness through nutrition, earning an online bachelor's degree in nutrition can help you become a registered dietitian or nutritionist. Those interested in leadership or healthcare administration may pursue cahme accredited online mha programs, which are highly respected in the field and designed for busy professionals.

Nurses who already have an RN license can explore online rn to bsn no clinicals programs, which allow them to earn a bachelor’s degree without the need for traditional clinical hours. With these flexible online pathways, you can tailor your education to fit your goals and pave the way to a fulfilling healthcare career.

Best Scientists Citing Gert Kwakkel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles