World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
35
Citations
4906
World Ranking
6756
National Ranking
3280

Linda K. Frisman publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda K. Frisman sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 90 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Linda K. Frisman D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda K. Frisman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Linda K. Frisman is affiliated with the University of Connecticut in the United States. Their academic profile features research contributions within an unspecified range of fields and topics.

Although no specific recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues are documented in the available data, the association with a major research institution suggests active involvement in scholarly activities consistent with university-level research standards.

No records are available detailing particular main fields or subfields of study, nor are there enumerated topics of work, which limits a precise overview of research specialization. Similarly, there is no information provided about book publications or awards achieved by Linda K. Frisman.

The absence of listed frequent co-authors and publication venues does not preclude collaborative or interdisciplinary work, yet specific details on such collaborations cannot be outlined here.

Based on the current data, their academic presence centers on the University of Connecticut, implying engagement with the institution's research environment and potential contribution to its scholarly outputs.

Best Publications

  • A comparison of clozapine and haloperidol in hospitalized patients with refractory schizophrenia. Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Clozapine in Refractory Schizophrenia.

    Robert Rosenheck;Joyce Cramer;Weichun Xu;Jonathan Thomas

  • Cost-effectiveness of Supported Housing for Homeless Persons With Mental Illness

    Robert Rosenheck;Wesley Kasprow;Linda Frisman;Wen Liu-Mares

  • Medication-assisted treatment in criminal justice agencies affiliated with the criminal justice-drug abuse treatment studies (CJ-DATS): availability, barriers, and intentions.

    Peter D. Friedmann;Randall Hoskinson;Randall Hoskinson;Randall Hoskinson;Michael Gordon;Robert Schwartz

  • Comparison of ACT and Standard Case Management for Delivering Integrated Treatment for Co-occurring Disorders

    Susan M. Essock;Kim T. Mueser;Robert E. Drake;Nancy H. Covell

  • Implementation and Effectiveness of Connecticut’s Risk-Based Gun Removal Law: Does it Prevent Suicides?

    Jeffrey W. Swanson;Michael A. Norko;Hsiu-Ju Lin;Kelly Alanis-Hirsch

  • The proportion of veterans among homeless men.

    Robert Rosenheck;Linda Frisman;An-Me Chung

  • Multisite experimental cost study of intensive psychiatric community care

    Robert Rosenheck;Michael Neale;Philip Leaf;Robert Milstein

  • COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF ASSERTIVE COMMUNITY TREATMENT TEAMS

    Susan M. Essock;Linda K. Frisman;Nina J. Kontos

  • Validity of Self-Reported Drug Use Among People with Co-Occurring Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders

    Carlos T. Jackson;Nancy H. Covell;Linda K. Frisman;Susan M. Essock

  • Cost-effectiveness of Clozapine in Patients With High and Low Levels of Hospital Use

    Robert Rosenheck;Joyce Cramer;Edward Allan;Joseph Erdos

  • A Comparison of Prebooking and Postbooking Diversion Programs for Mentally Ill Substance-Using Individuals With Justice Involvement

    Pamela K. Lattimore;Nahama Broner;Richard Sherman;Linda Frisman

  • Cost-effectiveness of clozapine compared with conventional antipsychotic medication for patients in state hospitals.

    Susan M. Essock;Linda K. Frisman;Nancy H. Covell;William A. Hargreaves

  • Effect of an organizational linkage intervention on staff perceptions of medication-assisted treatment and referral intentions in community corrections.

    Peter D. Friedmann;Peter D. Friedmann;Donna Wilson;Hannah K. Knudsen;Lori J. Ducharme

  • Rural and urban differences in patients with a dual diagnosis.

    Kim T Mueser;Susan M Essock;Robert E Drake;Rosemarie S Wolfe

  • Effectiveness and cost of specific treatment elements in a program for homeless mentally ill veterans.

    Robert Rosenheck;Linda Frisman;Peggy Gallup

  • Outcomes of Trauma Treatment Using the TARGET Model

    Linda Frisman;Julian Ford;Hsiu-Ju Lin;Sharon Mallon

  • An Examination of Fulfilled Housing Preferences and Quality of Life among Homeless Persons with Mental Illness and/or Substance Use Disorders

    Maria O’Connell;Robert Rosenheck;Wesley Kasprow;Linda Frisman

  • Referral and housing processes in a long-term supported housing program for homeless veterans.

    Wesley J. Kasprow;Robert A. Rosenheck;Linda Frisman;Diane DiLella

  • Costs of criminal justice involvement among persons with serious mental illness in connecticut.

    Jeffrey W. Swanson;Linda K. Frisman;Allison Gilbert Robertson;Hsiu-Ju Lin

  • Outcomes After Initial Receipt of Social Security Benefits Among Homeless Veterans With Mental Illness

    Robert A. Rosenheck;David J. Dausey;Linda Frisman;Wesley Kasprow

  • Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses of the Structured Interview for Disorders of Extreme Stress

    Alan Scoboria;Julian Ford;Hsiu-ju Lin;Linda Frisman

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert A. Rosenheck
Robert A. Rosenheck Yale University
Marvin S. Swartz
Marvin S. Swartz Duke University
Jeffrey W. Swanson
Jeffrey W. Swanson Duke University
Steven Belenko
Steven Belenko Temple University
Michael Prendergast
Michael Prendergast University of California, Los Angeles
Christy A. Visher
Christy A. Visher University of Delaware
Hannah K. Knudsen
Hannah K. Knudsen University of Kentucky
Jennifer R. Havens
Jennifer R. Havens University of Kentucky
Carl G. Leukefeld
Carl G. Leukefeld University of Kentucky
Peter D. Friedmann
Peter D. Friedmann University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Social Sciences and Humanities, online education in the USA provides flexible and affordable routes to a variety of rewarding careers. Many choose one year graduate programs to quickly develop advanced skills and boost their qualifications without delaying their entry into the workforce.

If you’re looking for a quicker way to earn your undergraduate degree, accelerated degree programs offer a streamlined curriculum—ideal for motivated students ready to fast-track their studies in fields like psychology, sociology, or communication.

Those considering careers in social work can take advantage of online msw programs affordable for budget-friendly master’s-level credentials. These programs typically prepare graduates for meaningful roles supporting individuals, families, and communities.

Additionally, for those drawn to behavioral health, bcba programs are available online, combining quality instruction with cost-effectiveness. Each path offers distinct career opportunities, making online study a practical choice for diverse professional goals in the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Linda K. Frisman

Trending Scientists