World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
58
Citations
12109
World Ranking
2566
National Ranking
301

Stephen C. Votier publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen C. Votier sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 145 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Stephen C. Votier D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen C. Votier sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen C. Votier is affiliated with Heriot-Watt University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily falls within the field of Environmental Science, with a particular focus on Ecology. They have contributed to multiple subfields including Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, and Epidemiology.

Their work covers a broad range of topics related to the study of wildlife and marine ecosystems. Notable topics include:

  • Avian ecology and behavior
  • Marine animal studies overview
  • Marine and fisheries research
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Isotope Analysis in Ecology

Frequent co-authors in their publications include:

  • Alice M. Trevail
  • Stuart Bearhop
  • Robin Freeman
  • Malcolm A. C. Nicoll
  • Hannah Wood

Stephen C. Votier has published extensively in several scientific journals. The venues where they have a significant number of publications are:

  • Marine Biology
  • Marine Ecology Progress Series
  • Ibis
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Scientific Reports

Selected recent papers by Stephen C. Votier include:

  • A review of a decade of lessons from one of the world's largest MPAs: conservation gains and key challenges, 2020, Marine Biology
  • High pathogenicity avian influenza (H5N1) in Northern Gannets ( Morus bassanus ): Global spread, clinical signs and demographic consequences, 2023, Ibis
  • GPS tracking reveals landfill closures induce higher foraging effort and habitat switching in gulls, 2021, Movement Ecology
  • Mercury exposure in an endangered seabird: long-term changes and relationships with trophic ecology and breeding success, 2020, Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
  • Status and phenology of breeding seabirds and a review of Important Bird and Biodiversity Areas in the British Indian Ocean Territory, 2020, Bird Conservation International

Best Publications

  • Factors That Influence Assimilation Rates and Fractionation of Nitrogen and Carbon Stable Isotopes in Avian Blood and Feathers

    Stuart Bearhop;Susan Waldron;Stephen C. Votier;Robert W. Furness

  • Marine renewable energy: potential benefits to biodiversity? An urgent call for research

    Richard Inger;Martin J. Attrill;Stuart Bearhop;Annette C. Broderick

  • Assortative Mating as a Mechanism for Rapid Evolution of a Migratory Divide

    Stuart Bearhop;Wolfgang Fiedler;Robert W. Furness;Stephen C. Votier

  • Space partitioning without territoriality in gannets.

    Ewan D. Wakefield;Thomas W. Bodey;Stuart Bearhop;Jez Blackburn

  • Changes in fisheries discard rates and seabird communities

    Stephen C. Votier;Robert W. Furness;Stuart Bearhop;Stuart Bearhop;Jonathan E. Crane

  • What determines a species’ geographical range? Thermal biology and latitudinal range size relationships in European diving beetles (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae)

    Piero Calosi;David T. Bilton;John I. Spicer;Stephen C. Votier

  • Individual responses of seabirds to commercial fisheries revealed using GPS tracking, stable isotopes and vessel monitoring systems

    Stephen C. Votier;Stuart Bearhop;Matthew J. Witt;Richard Inger

  • A Phylogenetically Controlled Meta-Analysis of Biologging Device Effects on Birds: Deleterious effects and a call for more standardized reporting of study data

    Thomas W. Bodey;Ian R. Cleasby;Fraser Bell;Nicole Parr

  • The use of plastic debris as nesting material by a colonial seabird and associated entanglement mortality

    Stephen C. Votier;Kirsten Archibald;Greg Morgan;Lisa Morgan

  • Stable isotope ratios indicate that body condition in migrating passerines is influenced by winter habitat.

    Stuart Bearhop;Geoff M. Hilton;Stephen C. Votier;Susan Waldron

  • A forensic approach to understanding diet and habitat use from stable isotope analysis of (avian) claw material

    S. Bearhop;R. W. Furness;G. M. Hilton;S. C. Votier

  • Potential consequences of discard reform for seabird communities

    Anthony W. J. Bicknell;Daniel Oro;Kees C.J. Camphuysen;Stephen C. Votier;Stephen C. Votier

  • REVIEW: On the Front Line: frontal zones as priority at-sea conservation areas for mobile marine vertebrates

    Kylie L. Scales;Peter I. Miller;Lucy A. Hawkes;Simon N. Ingram

  • Oil pollution and climate have wide-scale impacts on seabird demographics.

    Stephen C. Votier;Ben J. Hatchwell;Andrew Beckerman;Robin H. McCleery

  • Long-term individual foraging site fidelity--why some gannets don't change their spots.

    Ewan D. Wakefield;Ian R. Cleasby;Ian R. Cleasby;Stuart Bearhop;Thomas W. Bodey

  • Assessing the diet of great skuas, Catharacta skua, using five different techniques

    Stephen C. Votier;Stuart Bearhop;Aidan MacCormick;Norman Ratcliffe

  • Individual differences in searching behaviour and spatial foraging consistency in a central place marine predator

    Samantha C. Patrick;Stuart Bearhop;David Grémillet;Amélie Lescroël

  • Mesoscale fronts as foraging habitats: Composite front mapping reveals oceanographic drivers of habitat use for a pelagic seabird

    Kylie L. Scales;Peter I. Miller;Clare B. Embling;Simon N. Ingram

  • Future Directions in Conservation Research on Petrels and Shearwaters

    Airam Rodríguez;José M. Arcos;Vincent Bretagnolle;Maria P. Dias

  • Camera technology for monitoring marine biodiversity and human impact

    Anthony Wj Bicknell;Brendan J Godley;Emma V Sheehan;Stephen C Votier

  • Inter-colony movements, at-sea behaviour and foraging in an immature seabird: results from GPS-PPT tracking, radio-tracking and stable isotope analysis

    Stephen C. Votier;W. James Grecian;Samantha Patrick;Jason Newton

  • Recruitment and survival of immature seabirds in relation to oil spills and climate variability

    Stephen C. Votier;Tim R. Birkhead;Daniel Oro;Mark Trinder

Frequent Co-Authors

Stuart Bearhop
Stuart Bearhop University of Exeter
Robert W. Furness
Robert W. Furness University of Glasgow
Jason Newton
Jason Newton University of Glasgow
Keith C. Hamer
Keith C. Hamer University of Leeds
Richard A. Phillips
Richard A. Phillips British Antarctic Survey
Samantha C. Patrick
Samantha C. Patrick University of Liverpool
David Grémillet
David Grémillet Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Brendan J. Godley
Brendan J. Godley University of Exeter
Matthew J. Witt
Matthew J. Witt University of Exeter
Peter I. Miller
Peter I. Miller Plymouth Marine Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution in the USA can connect you with a wide range of career paths, including opportunities in science education, research, conservation, and healthcare. Many professionals consider branching into healthcare thanks to the strong job demand and flexible study options.

If you’re interested in nursing, there are several accelerated online programs designed to help you advance your career. For those already holding an RN license, check out the rn to bsn in 6 months programs, which allow you to quickly earn your bachelor’s degree in nursing. Registered nurses with an associate degree can also pursue more advanced roles through adn to np programs, which bridge the gap to becoming a nurse practitioner.

Wondering how many years does it take to be a nurse practitioner? Traditionally, the process takes several years, but new bridge programs and online options can significantly reduce this timeframe. And if you’re curious about career prospects, you can find out how much does a psychiatric nurse practitioner make to help inform your decision.

Exploring related online degrees and understanding the various healthcare pathways can help you make informed choices about your future, whether you stay in the ecological sciences or move toward patient care.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen C. Votier

Trending Scientists