World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
47
Citations
7030
World Ranking
5883
National Ranking
456

Peter I. Miller publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter I. Miller sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 144 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Peter I. Miller D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter I. Miller sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter I. Miller is affiliated with the Plymouth Marine Laboratory in the United Kingdom. Their research predominantly falls within the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a significant focus on subfields such as Ecology, Oceanography, Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Chemistry, and Atmospheric Science.

The scientist's work encompasses a range of topics centered on marine and environmental science, including:

  • Marine and fisheries research
  • Isotope Analysis in Ecology
  • Marine Biology and Ecology Research
  • Marine and coastal ecosystems
  • Marine animal studies overview
  • Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Marine Toxins and Detection Methods

Their recent published papers illustrate a diverse research output across several respected venues. Some of the notable recent publications include:

  • "Bright spots as climate-smart marine spatial planning tools for conservation and blue growth" (2021, Global Change Biology)
  • "HABreports: Online Early Warning of Harmful Algal and Biotoxin Risk for the Scottish Shellfish and Finfish Aquaculture Industries" (2021, Frontiers in Marine Science)
  • "Current Status of Forecasting Toxic Harmful Algae for the North-East Atlantic Shellfish Aquaculture Industry" (2021, Frontiers in Marine Science)
  • "Ocean shelf exchange, NW European shelf seas: Measurements, estimates and comparisons" (2022, Progress In Oceanography)
  • "Current Trends and Challenges for Rapid SMART Diagnostics at Point-of-Site Testing for Marine Toxins" (2021, Sensors)

Frequent co-authors associated with Peter I. Miller's work include Andrey A. Kurekin, Kylie L. Scales, Lily K. Bentley, Melanie C. Austen, and Mark Bolton. This collaboration indicates ongoing partnerships across multiple research efforts in marine and environmental science.

The scientist's work has appeared most regularly in publication venues such as Frontiers in Marine Science, SSRN Electronic Journal, Progress In Oceanography, Environmental Science & Policy, and Remote Sensing. This distribution reflects a focus on marine science, environmental policy, and remote sensing methodologies.

Best Publications

  • Comparison of five modelling techniques to predict the spatial distribution and abundance of seabirds

    Steffen Oppel;Ana Meirinho;Iván Ramírez;Beth Gardner

  • Ocean-wide tracking of pelagic sharks reveals extent of overlap with longline fishing hotspots.

    Nuno Queiroz;Nicolas E. Humphries;Gonzalo Mucientes;Neil Hammerschlag

  • REVIEW: On the Front Line: frontal zones as priority at-sea conservation areas for mobile marine vertebrates

    Kylie L. Scales;Peter I. Miller;Lucy A. Hawkes;Simon N. Ingram

  • Implementing and innovating marine monitoring approaches for assessing marine environmental status

    Roberto Danovaro;Laura Carugati;Marco Berzano;Abigail E. Cahill;Abigail E. Cahill

  • Long-term individual foraging site fidelity--why some gannets don't change their spots.

    Ewan D. Wakefield;Ian R. Cleasby;Ian R. Cleasby;Stuart Bearhop;Thomas W. Bodey

  • Does Presence of a Mid-Ocean Ridge Enhance Biomass and Biodiversity?

    Imants G. Priede;Odd Aksel Bergstad;Peter I. Miller;Michael Vecchione

  • Predicting emergency department admissions

    Justin Boyle;Melanie Jessup;Julia Crilly;David Green

  • Hydrographical variability on the French continental shelf in the Bay of Biscay, during the 1990s

    Ingrid Puillat;Pascal Lazure;Anne-Marie Jegou;Luis Lampert

  • Mesoscale fronts as foraging habitats: Composite front mapping reveals oceanographic drivers of habitat use for a pelagic seabird

    Kylie L. Scales;Peter I. Miller;Clare B. Embling;Simon N. Ingram

  • Sea-surface signatures of the island mass effect phenomena around Madeira Island, Northeast Atlantic

    Rma Caldeira;SB Groom;PI Miller;DA Pilgrim

  • Low-cost volcano surveillance from space: case studies from Etna, Krafla, Cerro Negro, Fogo, Lascar and Erebus

    Andrew J. L. Harris;Anna L. Butterworth;Richard W. Carlton;Ian Downey

  • Ocean margin exchange—water flux estimates

    John M. Huthnance;Hendrik M. Van Aken;Martin White;E.Desmond Barton

  • Assessing wave energy effects on biodiversity: the wave hub experience.

    M. J. Witt;E. V. Sheehan;S. Bearhop;A. C. Broderick

  • A large and prolonged bloom of Karenia mikimotoi in Scottish waters in 2006

    Keith Davidson;Peter Miller;Thomas A. Wilding;Jamie Shutler

  • Spatial patterns of wind and sea surface temperature in the Galician upwelling region

    R Torres;R Torres;ED Barton;PI Miller;EA Fanjul

  • Composite front maps for improved visibility of dynamic sea-surface features on cloudy SeaWiFS and AVHRR data

    Peter Miller

  • Pan-Atlantic analysis of the overlap of a highly migratory species, the leatherback turtle, with pelagic longline fisheries

    S. Fossette;M.J. Witt;P. Miller;M. A. Nalovic

  • Breeding density, fine-scale tracking and large-scale modeling reveal the regional distribution of four seabird species

    Ewan D. Wakefield;Ewan D. Wakefield;Ellie Owen;Julia Baer;Matthew J. Carroll

  • Pelagic production at the Celtic Sea shelf break

    Ian Joint;Roland Wollast;Lei Chou;Sonia Batten

  • Identifying predictable foraging habitats for a wide‐ranging marine predator using ensemble ecological niche models

    Kylie L. Scales;Kylie L. Scales;Kylie L. Scales;Peter I. Miller;Simon N. Ingram;Elliott L. Hazen

Frequent Co-Authors

Steve Groom
Steve Groom Plymouth Marine Laboratory
David W. Sims
David W. Sims University of Southampton
Stephen C. Votier
Stephen C. Votier Heriot-Watt University
Keith Davidson
Keith Davidson Scottish Association For Marine Science
Andrew P. Rees
Andrew P. Rees Plymouth Marine Laboratory
Gavin H. Tilstone
Gavin H. Tilstone Plymouth Marine Laboratory
Imants G. Priede
Imants G. Priede University of Aberdeen
Andrew S. Brierley
Andrew S. Brierley University of St Andrews
Timothy J Smyth
Timothy J Smyth Plymouth Marine Laboratory
Mark Inall
Mark Inall Scottish Association For Marine Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in broadening their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, pursuing an best online masters in public administration can be a strategic choice. This degree equips students with leadership skills vital for managing environmental policies and public programs effectively.

Another complementary option is obtaining an accredited online bachelors in sociology. This degree enhances understanding of societal behaviors and cultural impacts, which are essential when addressing environmental challenges in community settings.

For educators looking to advance in environmental education, pursuing an edd no dissertation program offers a flexible path to doctoral-level qualifications without the lengthy dissertation. This can speed up career progression in academic and policy roles.

Additionally, the online eds to edd bridge program allows professionals with a master's degree in education to seamlessly transition to a doctorate. This pathway supports specialization in environmental education leadership, enhancing career prospects in schools and organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Peter I. Miller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles