What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Ecology
- Oceanography
- Carbon dioxide
Andrew P. Rees mostly deals with Oceanography, Phytoplankton, Nitrate, Environmental chemistry and Upwelling.
His Oceanography research includes elements of Biogeochemical cycle, Photic zone, Nutrient and New production.
His Biogeochemical cycle study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Biodiversity, Ecosystem and Mediterranean sea.
His Phytoplankton study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Biomass, Deep sea, Water mass and Chlorophyll a.
His studies in Environmental chemistry integrate themes in fields like Hydrology and Nitrification.
His Upwelling research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in SeaWiFS, Continental shelf and Hydrography.
His most cited work include:
- Marine ecosystems' responses to climatic and anthropogenic forcings in the Mediterranean (279 citations)
- Database of diazotrophs in global ocean: abundance, biomass and nitrogen fixation rates (220 citations)
- Nutrient distributions in an anticyclonic eddy in the northeast Atlantic Ocean, with reference to nanomolar ammonium concentrations (138 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His primary areas of investigation include Oceanography, Phytoplankton, Environmental chemistry, Holocene and Upwelling.
Andrew P. Rees combines subjects such as Photic zone, Nutrient and New production with his study of Oceanography.
As a member of one scientific family, Andrew P. Rees mostly works in the field of Phytoplankton, focusing on Chlorophyll a and, on occasion, Dissolved organic carbon.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Hydrology and Plankton.
His Holocene research integrates issues from Peat, Vegetation, Physical geography and Southern Hemisphere.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Water mass and Biogeochemistry in addition to Upwelling.
He most often published in these fields:
- Oceanography (45.12%)
- Phytoplankton (20.12%)
- Environmental chemistry (11.59%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?
- Physical geography (7.93%)
- Oceanography (45.12%)
- Holocene (12.20%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His main research concerns Physical geography, Oceanography, Holocene, Composite material and Nitrous oxide.
His research in Physical geography intersects with topics in Palynology, Bog, Climate change and Environmental DNA.
He studies Pelagic zone, a branch of Oceanography.
His work deals with themes such as Peat, Cartography and Southern Hemisphere, which intersect with Holocene.
His Nitrous oxide research includes themes of Denitrification, Trace gas, Water column and Greenhouse gas.
The concepts of his Environmental chemistry study are interwoven with issues in Phytoplankton and Carbon fixation.
Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Publisher Correction: A global database of Holocene paleotemperature records (42 citations)
- A global database of Holocene paleotemperature records (32 citations)
- An intercomparison of oceanic methane and nitrous oxide measurements (19 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Ecology
- Oceanography
- Carbon dioxide
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Holocene, Trace gas, Polymer, Injection moulding and Atmospheric sciences.
The various areas that Andrew P. Rees examines in his Holocene study include Peat, Cartography, Physical geography and Southern Hemisphere.
His Trace gas research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Climatology, Nitrous oxide, Methane, Baltic sea and Calibration.
His research integrates issues of Hydrography, Ocean observations and Troposphere in his study of Nitrous oxide.
His work in Polymer addresses issues such as Ultimate tensile strength, which are connected to fields such as Polypropylene.
His studies deal with areas such as Surface ocean, Ocean acidification and Biogeochemistry as well as Atmospheric sciences.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
