World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
James K. Stoller

James K. Stoller

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 80 17082 16059 8560 7913 484 24231

James K. Stoller publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by James K. Stoller between 1984 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. James K. Stoller published across 43 years, from 1984 to 2026, averaging 12.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2005. 16 of the 525 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2005. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 4 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 9 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 9 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 10 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 13 publications 1997: 12 publications 1998: 14 publications 1999: 16 publications 2000: 16 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 20 publications 2003: 19 publications 2004: 17 publications 2005: 26 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 25 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 15 publications 2026: 1 publication
1984 2026

525 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
James K. Stoller: publications per year, 1984 to 2026
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 1
1986 4
1987 4
1988 9
1989 4
1990 9
1991 7
1992 10
1993 10
1994 10
1995 5
1996 13
1997 12
1998 14
1999 16
2000 16
2001 8
2002 20
2003 19
2004 17
2005 26
2006 11
2007 13
2008 19
2009 25
2010 14
2011 10
2012 12
2013 13
2014 13
2015 19
2016 12
2017 14
2018 12
2019 15
2020 21
2021 21
2022 9
2023 10
2024 11
2025 15
2026 1
Total 525
Download as CSV

James K. Stoller publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James K. Stoller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 481–500 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 484 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713 484
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

James K. Stoller D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James K. Stoller sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972 80
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

James K. Stoller is affiliated with the Cleveland Clinic in the United States and has an extensive publication record in the field of medicine, focusing primarily on pulmonary and respiratory medicine. Their research contributions span areas including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) research, respiratory support and mechanisms, innovations in medical education, and asthma and respiratory diseases.

Their notable research topics include:

  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
  • Diversity and Career in Medicine
  • Empathy and Medical Education

Stoller's contributions have appeared predominantly in the following publication venues:

  • CHEST Journal
  • BMJ Leader
  • Respiratory Care
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • Journal of Graduate Medical Education

Recent papers authored by Stoller include:

  • "Reflections on leadership in the time of COVID-19" (2020) published in BMJ Leader
  • "Emotional Intelligence" (2020) published in CHEST Journal
  • "A Perspective on the Educational "SWOT" of the Coronavirus Pandemic" (2020) published in CHEST Journal

Frequent co-authors working alongside Stoller encompass:

  • Octavian C. Ioachimescu
  • Umur Hatipoğlu
  • Subha Ghosh
  • Charlie Strange
  • Vickram Tejwani

The main field of study for Stoller centers on Medicine, with a specific subfield concentration in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, followed by Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Oncology, and Physiology.

Stoller's scholarly output contributes to an interdisciplinary understanding of lung diseases, respiratory care mechanisms, and medical education innovations, highlighting a combination of clinical insight and academic analysis within their areas of expertise.

Best Publications

  • α1-antitrypsin deficiency

    James K Stoller;Loutfi S Aboussouan

  • American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society: Standards in Diagnostik und Therapie bei Patienten mit Alpha-1-Antitrypsin-Mangel

    J. K. Stoller;G. L. Snider;M. L. Brantly;R. J. Fallat

  • Detection of lung cancer by sensor array analyses of exhaled breath.

    Roberto F. Machado;Daniel Laskowski;Olivia Deffenderfer;Timothy Burch

  • The hepatopulmonary syndrome.

    Paul A. Lange;James K. Stoller

  • Survival and FEV1 decline in individuals with severe deficiency of α1-antitrypsin

    C. E. Vreim;M. Wu;R. G. Crystal;A. S. Buist

  • A Review of α1-Antitrypsin Deficiency

    James K. Stoller;Loutfi S. Aboussouan

  • A randomized trial of long-term oxygen for COPD with moderate desaturation

    Albert Rk;Au Dh;Blackford Al

  • A Comprehensive Care Management Program to Prevent Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Hospitalizations: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

    Vincent S. Fan;J. Michael Gaziano;Robert Lew;Jean Bourbeau

  • Just imagine: new paradigms for medical education.

    Neil B. Mehta;Alan L. Hull;James B. Young;James K. Stoller

  • Mechanical Ventilator Weaning Protocols Driven by Nonphysician Health-Care Professionals: Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

    E. Wesley Ely;Maureen O. Meade;Edward F. Haponik;Marin H. Kollef

  • Baseline Characteristics of Enrollees in the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Registry of α1-Antitrypsin Deficiency

    Noel G. McElcaney;James K. Stoller;A. Sonia Buist;Udaya B.S. Prakash

  • Comorbidities, Patient Knowledge, and Disease Management in a National Sample of Patients with COPD

    R. Graham Barr;Bartolome R. Celli;David M. Mannino;Thomas Petty

  • Role of Flexible Bronchoscopy in Immunocompromised Patients With Lung Infiltrates

    Prasoon Jain;Sunder Sandur;Yvonne Meli;Alejandro C. Arroliga

  • Erratum: ATS/ERS Statement: Standards for the Diagnosis and Management of Individuals with Alpha-1 Antitrypsin Deficiency (American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (835))

    James Stoller

  • Risk factors for an outbreak of multi-drug-resistant Acinetobacter nosocomial pneumonia among intubated patients.

    Rola N. Husni;Lawrence S. Goldstein;Alejandro C. Arroliga;Geraldine S. Hall

  • An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: research questions in COPD

    Bartolome R. Celli;Marc Decramer;Jadwiga A. Wedzicha;Kevin C. Wilson

  • Delay in Diagnosis of α1-Antitrypsin Deficiency: A Continuing Problem

    James K. Stoller;Robert A. Sandhaus;Gerard Turino;Ryan Dickson

  • Oxygen Therapy for Patients With COPD: Current Evidence and the Long-Term Oxygen Treatment Trial

    James K. Stoller;Ralph J. Panos;Samuel Krachman;Dennis E. Doherty

  • α1-Antitrypsin deficiency

    Catherine M. Greene;Stefan J. Marciniak;Jeffrey Teckman;Ilaria Ferrarotti

  • The hepatopulmonary syndrome

    Loutfi S Aboussouan;James K Stoller

Frequent Co-Authors

Ronald G. Crystal
Ronald G. Crystal Cornell University
Edward J. Campbell
Edward J. Campbell University of Utah
Edwin K. Silverman
Edwin K. Silverman Brigham and Women's Hospital
Noel G. McElvaney
Noel G. McElvaney Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland
Dawn L. DeMeo
Dawn L. DeMeo Brigham and Women's Hospital
Fernando J. Martinez
Fernando J. Martinez University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Frank C. Sciurba
Frank C. Sciurba University of Pittsburgh
Roger D. Yusen
Roger D. Yusen Washington University in St. Louis
Anne L. Fuhlbrigge
Anne L. Fuhlbrigge University of Colorado Denver
Stephen I. Rennard
Stephen I. Rennard University of Nebraska Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative pathways in healthcare can help you specialize or accelerate your career in medicine. For those aspiring to advanced nursing roles, the quickest dnp program options offer an efficient way to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice online without sacrificing quality or flexibility.

If affordability is your main concern, numerous cheapest dnp programs make it possible to earn a valuable degree without excessive student debt. These programs often allow nurses to continue their careers while studying, making them an accessible option for many.

Beginners and those looking to enter nursing quickly may consider an lpn accelerated program. These programs can help you launch a healthcare career in just a year, with the flexibility of online coursework and hands-on clinical training.

Additionally, mental health is a growing focus in medicine. Pursuing one of the psychiatric np programs online enables nursing professionals to specialize and meet the increasing demand for mental health practitioners.

Best Scientists Citing James K. Stoller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles