World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
85
Citations
30877
World Ranking
631
National Ranking
226

James D. Bever publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James D. Bever sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 222 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

James D. Bever D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James D. Bever sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation
  • 2012 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

James D. Bever is affiliated with the University of Kansas in the United States. Their research primarily lies in the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Environmental Science, with a strong focus on plant science and ecology.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Plant Parasitism and Resistance
  • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Plant and Animal Studies
  • Fungal Biology and Applications
  • Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases

Frequent co-authors collaborating with James D. Bever are:

  • Liz Koziol
  • Camille S. Delavaux
  • Peggy A. Schultz
  • Sidney Luiz Stürmer
  • Maarten B. Eppinga

They have published multiple articles in key venues, notably in:

  • Mycorrhiza
  • Ecology and Evolution
  • New Phytologist
  • Restoration Ecology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Notable recent papers by James D. Bever include:

  • Soil microbial legacy drives crop diversity advantage: Linking ecological plant-soil feedback with agricultural intercropping, 2020, Journal of Applied Ecology
  • Below-ground-mediated and phase-dependent processes drive nitrogen-evoked community changes in grasslands, 2020, Journal of Ecology
  • Manipulating plant microbiomes in the field: Native mycorrhizae advance plant succession and improve native plant restoration, 2021, Journal of Applied Ecology
  • Perennial, but not annual legumes synergistically benefit from infection with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and rhizobia: a meta-analysis, 2021, New Phytologist
  • Mycorrhizal types influence island biogeography of plants, 2021, Communications Biology

James D. Bever has been recognized with professional honors including:

  • Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation, 2013
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 2012

Best Publications

  • Plant–soil feedbacks: the past, the present and future challenges

    Wim H. van der Putten;Richard D. Bardgett;James D. Bever;T. Martijn Bezemer

  • Incorporating the soil community into plant population dynamics: the utility of the feedback approach.

    James D. Bever;Kristi M. Westover;Janis Antonovics

  • A meta-analysis of context-dependency in plant response to inoculation with mycorrhizal fungi

    Jason D. Hoeksema;V. Bala Chaudhary;Catherine A. Gehring;Nancy Collins Johnson

  • Negative plant–soil feedback predicts tree-species relative abundance in a tropical forest

    Scott A. Mangan;Stefan A. Schnitzer;Stefan A. Schnitzer;Edward A. Herre;Keenan M. L. Mack

  • Soil community feedback and the coexistence of competitors: conceptual frameworks and empirical tests

    James D. Bever

  • Biotic interactions and plant invasions

    Charles E. Mitchell;Anurag A. Agrawal;James D. Bever;Gregory S. Gilbert

  • Rooting theories of plant community ecology in microbial interactions

    James D. Bever;Ian A. Dickie;Evelina Facelli;Jose M. Facelli

  • GRASSROOTS ECOLOGY: PLANT-MICROBE-SOIL INTERACTIONS AS DRIVERS OF PLANT COMMUNITY STRUCTURE AND DYNAMICS

    Heather L. Reynolds;Alissa Packer;James D. Bever;Keith Clay

  • Feeback between Plants and Their Soil Communities in an Old Field Community

    James D. Bever

  • Host-Dependent Sporulation and Species Diversity of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in a Mown Grassland

    James D. Bever;Joseph B. Morton;Janis Antonovics;Peggy A. Schultz

  • Preferential allocation to beneficial symbiont with spatial structure maintains mycorrhizal mutualism.

    James D. Bever;Sarah C. Richardson;Brandy M. Lawrence;Jonathan Holmes

  • Microbial population and community dynamics on plant roots and their feedbacks on plant communities.

    James D. Bever;Thomas G. Platt;Elise R. Morton

  • Mycorrhizal Symbioses and Plant Invasions

    Anne Pringle;James D. Bever;Monique Gardes;Jeri L. Parrent

  • Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi: More Diverse than Meets the Eye, and the Ecological Tale of Why

    James D. Bever;Peggy A. Schultz;Anne Pringle;Joseph B. Morton

  • Negative feedback within a mutualism: host–specific growth of mycorrhizal fungi reduces plant benefit

    James D. Bever

  • Mycorrhizal fungal identity and richness determine the diversity and productivity of a tallgrass prairie system

    Keith M. Vogelsang;Heather L. Reynolds;James D. Bever

  • Maintenance of Plant Species Diversity by Pathogens

    James D. Bever;Scott A. Mangan;Helen M. Alexander

  • Coevolution of symbiotic mutualists and parasites in a community context.

    Peter H. Thrall;Michael E. Hochberg;Jeremy J. Burdon;James D. Bever

  • Conspecific negative density dependence and forest diversity.

    Daniel J. Johnson;Wesley T. Beaulieu;James D. Bever;Keith Clay

  • Mycorrhizal densities decline in association with nonnative plants and contribute to plant invasion

    Keith M. Vogelsang;James D. Bever

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter H. Thrall
Peter H. Thrall Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Keith Clay
Keith Clay Tulane University
John N. Klironomos
John N. Klironomos American University of Sharjah
Anne Pringle
Anne Pringle University of Wisconsin–Madison
Gail W. T. Wilson
Gail W. T. Wilson Oklahoma State University
Catherine A. Gehring
Catherine A. Gehring Northern Arizona University
Janis Antonovics
Janis Antonovics University of Virginia
Fusuo Zhang
Fusuo Zhang China Agricultural University
Clay Fuqua
Clay Fuqua Indiana University
Miranda M. Hart
Miranda M. Hart University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A degree in Ecology and Evolution opens the door to a variety of interdisciplinary careers, especially when combined with skills from related fields. Many students choose to complement their studies with online qualifications in specialized areas, which can enhance career flexibility and advancement.

For example, professionals interested in behavioral studies and conservation outreach might consider an online masters in mental health counseling to gain expertise in communication, counseling, and public health. Similarly, those drawn to legal or criminological aspects of wildlife protection could pursue forensic psychology masters programs, bridging the gap between environmental issues and the justice system.

A passion for education and outreach can also be fueled by earning an online masters in child psychology, which offers valuable insights into youth engagement and education—key for conservation programs targeting the next generation. If budget is a concern, there are resources to find the cheapest online master's in counseling, allowing students to diversify their skills without financial barriers.

Broadening your qualifications with these related online degrees can lead to more diverse career pathways—from environmental education and advocacy to public health, forensics, and counseling within ecological contexts.

Best Scientists Citing James D. Bever

Trending Scientists