World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9668 9045 5100 4653 137 12459

Christopher R. Agnew publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Christopher R. Agnew between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Christopher R. Agnew published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 5.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2011. 4 of the 191 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2011. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 11 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 3 publications
1993 2025

191 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Christopher R. Agnew: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 1
1995 0
1996 1
1997 3
1998 7
1999 6
2000 4
2001 10
2002 2
2003 6
2004 4
2005 1
2006 11
2007 8
2008 11
2009 10
2010 5
2011 12
2012 8
2013 7
2014 12
2015 9
2016 9
2017 6
2018 6
2019 10
2020 6
2021 3
2022 5
2023 3
2024 1
2025 3
Total 191
Download as CSV

Christopher R. Agnew publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher R. Agnew sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 137 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 137
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Christopher R. Agnew D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Christopher R. Agnew sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Christopher R. Agnew is affiliated with Purdue University West Lafayette in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on psychology and the social sciences, with a notable emphasis on social psychology and experimental and cognitive psychology. The scientist's work covers a broad range of subfields, including sociology and political science, applied psychology, and demography.

Their main topics of research include:

  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Media Influence and Health

Christopher R. Agnew has published in several venues, frequently contributing to the following journals and libraries:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Technology Mind and Behavior
  • Current Opinion in Psychology
  • Journal of Happiness Studies
  • The Journal of Social Psychology

Recent notable publications include:

  • "Dealing with loss in the face of disasters and crises: Integrating interpersonal theories of couple adaptation and functioning" (2021), published in Current Opinion in Psychology
  • "Forming meaningful connections between strangers in virtual reality: Comparing affiliative outcomes by interaction modality" (2022), published in Technology Mind and Behavior
  • "Commitment strength versus commitment bolstering: Uncertainty undermines and promotes relationship success" (2020), published in The Journal of Social Psychology
  • "Playing the field or locking down a partner?: Perceptions of available romantic partners and commitment readiness" (2022), published in Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
  • "Relationship Status and Psychological Well-being: Initial Evidence for the Moderating Effects of Commitment Readiness" (2023), published in Journal of Happiness Studies

Frequent collaborators in Christopher R. Agnew's research include Kenneth Tan, Ledina Imami, Benjamin W. Hadden, Laura V. Machia, and Jocelyn T. Warren.

In recognition of professional contributions, Christopher R. Agnew was named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2011.

Best Publications

  • The Investment Model Scale: Measuring commitment level, satisfaction level, quality of alternatives, and investment size

    Caryl E. Rusbult;John M. Martz;Christopher R. Agnew

  • Cognitive Interdependence: Commitment and the Mental Representation of Close Relationships

    Christopher R. Agnew;Paul A. M. Van Lange;Caryl E. Rusbult;Christopher A. Langston

  • Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships.

    Jennifer Wieselquist;Caryl E. Rusbult;Craig A. Foster;Christopher R. Agnew

  • Commitment and its theorized determinants: A meta–analysis of the Investment Model

    Benjamin Le;Christopher R. Agnew

  • Predicting nonmarital romantic relationship dissolution: A meta-analytic synthesis

    Benjamin Le;Natalie L. Dove;Christopher R. Agnew;Miriam S. Korn

  • Being Committed: Affective, Cognitive, and Conative Components of Relationship Commitment

    Ximena B. Arriaga;Christopher R. Agnew

  • Commitment, pro-relationship behavior, and trust in close relationships.

    Unknown

  • From game theory to real life: How social value orientation affects willingness to sacrifice in ongoing close relationships?

    Paul A. M. Van Lange;Christopher R. Agnew;Fieke Harinck;Gemma E. M. Steemers

  • Marginalized Relationships: The Impact of Social Disapproval on Romantic Relationship Commitment

    Justin J. Lehmiller;Christopher R. Agnew

  • Relationship perceptions and persistence: do fluctuations in perceived partner commitment undermine dating relationships?

    Ximena B. Arriaga;Jason T. Reed;Wind Goodfriend;Christopher R. Agnew

  • Substituting the forest for the trees: social networks and the prediction of romantic relationship state and fate.

    Christopher R. Agnew;Timothy J. Loving;Stephen M. Drigotas

  • Sunken Costs and Desired Plans: Examining Different Types of Investments in Close Relationships

    Wind Goodfriend;Christopher R. Agnew

  • Subjective norms and the prediction of romantic relationship state and fate

    Paul E. Etcheverry;Christopher R. Agnew

  • Perceived Marginalization and the Prediction of Romantic Relationship Stability

    Justin J Lehmiller;Christopher R Agnew

  • The Investment Model of Commitment Processes

    Caryl E. Rusbult;Christopher R. Agnew;Ximena B. Arriaga

  • The proximal association between smoking and alcohol use among first year college students

    Lisa Dierker;Elizabeth Lloyd-Richardson;Marilyn Stolar;Brian Flay

  • Need Fulfillment and Emotional Experience in Interdependent Romantic Relationships

    Benjamin Le;Christopher R. Agnew

  • Thinking Close: Measuring Relational Closeness as Perceived Self-Other Inclusion

    Christopher R. Agnew;Timothy J. Loving;Benjamin Le;Wind Goodfriend

  • Proximal and Distal Predictors of Homophobia: Framing the Multivariate Roots of Outgroup Rejection1

    Christopher R. Agnew;Vaida D. Thompson;Valerie A. Smith;Richard H. Gramzow

  • Romantic partner and friend influences on young adult cigarette smoking: comparing close others' smoking and injunctive norms over time.

    Paul E. Etcheverry;Christopher R. Agnew

  • Nonmarital Romantic Relationship Commitment and Leave Behavior: The Mediating Role of Dissolution Consideration

    Laura E. VanderDrift;Christopher R. Agnew;Juan E. Wilson

  • Cognitive interdependece: Commitment and the cognitive representation of close relationships.

    C.R. Agnew;P.A.M. van Lange;C.E. Rusbult;C.A. Langston

Frequent Co-Authors

Ximena B. Arriaga
Ximena B. Arriaga Purdue University West Lafayette
Caryl E. Rusbult
Caryl E. Rusbult Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Janice R. Kelly
Janice R. Kelly Purdue University West Lafayette
Robert L. Balster
Robert L. Balster Virginia Commonwealth University
Renato V. Iozzo
Renato V. Iozzo Thomas Jefferson University
Jeffry A. Simpson
Jeffry A. Simpson University of Minnesota
Susan C. South
Susan C. South Purdue University West Lafayette
Brian R. Flay
Brian R. Flay Boise State University
Linda M. Collins
Linda M. Collins New York University
Robert J. McMahon
Robert J. McMahon Simon Fraser University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens doors to a range of rewarding careers in the mental health field. Whether you aspire to become a licensed professional counselor, a school psychologist, or a clinical therapist, understanding local licensing requirements is essential. The specific educational path and licensure process may vary significantly depending on where you plan to practice.

For example, the Plano licensed therapist education requirements outline the academic degrees, supervised clinical experience, and examination processes required in Texas. Meanwhile, if you are considering moving to a different region, you may want to learn more about becoming a licensed therapist in Port St. Lucie for Florida-based criteria and procedures.

Requirements can also differ in the Pacific Northwest, as explained in the guide to becoming a licensed therapist in Portland. For those interested in practicing in North Carolina, review the Raleigh licensed therapist requirements for vital information.

Researching state-specific pathways will help you choose the best online degree program and prepare to meet the unique licensing standards in your desired location.

Best Scientists Citing Christopher R. Agnew

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles