World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
106
Citations
38197
World Ranking
473
National Ranking
304

Brian R. Flay publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian R. Flay sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 346 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Brian R. Flay D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian R. Flay sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 106 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brian R. Flay was affiliated with Boise State University in the United States. Their research mainly contributed to the fields of social sciences and psychology, with a focus on clinical psychology, education, safety research, social psychology, and epidemiology.

Their work addressed a variety of topics, prominently including child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, youth development and social support, early childhood education and development, substance abuse treatment and outcomes, behavioral health and interventions, community health and development, and bullying, victimization, and aggression.

Brian R. Flay authored several research papers published in notable academic venues. These included:

  • Impact of a Brief, Bystander Bullying Prevention Program on Depressive Symptoms and Passive Suicidal Ideation: A Program Evaluation Model for School Personnel, 2020, Journal of Prevention and Health Promotion
  • Efficacy of the eCHECKUP TO GO for High School Seniors: Sex Differences in Risk Factors, Protective Behavioral Strategies, and Alcohol Use, 2020, Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
  • Effects of Positive Action in Elementary School on Student Behavioral and Social-Emotional Outcomes, 2021, The Elementary School Journal
  • Social-emotional and character development scale: Validation with urban middle school students, 2021, Children and Youth Services Review
  • How Do Discrimination and Self-Esteem Control Beliefs Affect Prosociality? An Examination Among Black and Latinx Youth, 2020, The Journal of Early Adolescence

Throughout their career, they collaborated frequently with several scholars, including Kendra Lewis, Niloofar Bavarian, David L. DuBois, Diana M. Doumas, and Laura Bond, each contributing to multiple joint publications.

The venues where Brian R. Flay's research appeared frequently included:

  • Journal of Prevention and Health Promotion
  • Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs
  • The Elementary School Journal
  • Children and Youth Services Review
  • The Journal of Early Adolescence

The overall scope of their work covered psychosocial and behavioral development in youth, the effects of prevention and intervention programs, and analysis of risk and protective factors related to substance use and emotional well-being.

Best Publications

  • Reviewing Theories of Adolescent Substance Use: Organizing Pieces in the Puzzle

    John Petraitis;Brian R. Flay;Todd Q. Miller

  • Standards of Evidence: Criteria for Efficacy, Effectiveness and Dissemination

    Brian R Flay;Anthony Biglan;Robert F Boruch;Felipe González Castro

  • Why children start smoking cigarettes: predictors of onset.

    Karen M. Conrad;Brian R. Flay;David Hill

  • A Multicommunity Trial for Primary Prevention of Adolescent Drug Abuse: Effects on Drug Use Prevalence

    Mary Ann Pentz;James H. Dwyer;David P. MacKinnon;Brian R. Flay

  • Efficacy and Effectiveness Trials (and Other Phases of Research) in the Development of Health Promotion Programs

    Brian R. Flay

  • Stages in the development of adolescent smoking.

    Kathryn P Mayhew;Brian R Flay;Joshua A Mott

  • Differential influence of parental smoking and friends' smoking on adolescent initiation and escalation of smoking.

    B R Flay;F B Hu;O Siddiqui;L E Day

  • Psychosocial approaches to smoking prevention: A review of findings.

    Brian R. Flay

  • Psychosocial Predictors of Different Stages of Cigarette Smoking among High School Students

    Brian R. Flay;Frank B. Hu;Jean Richardson

  • The critical role of nurturing environments for promoting human well-being.

    Anthony Biglan;Brian R. Flay;Dennis D. Embry;Irwin N. Sandler

  • Mass media and smoking cessation: a critical review.

    B R Flay

  • Comparison of Population-Averaged and Subject-Specific Approaches for Analyzing Repeated Binary Outcomes

    Frank B. Hu;Jack Goldberg;Donald Hedeker;Brian R. Flay

  • Relative Effectiveness of Comprehensive Community Programming for Drug Abuse Prevention With High-Risk and Low-Risk Adolescents

    C. Anderson Johnson;Mary Ann Pentz;Mark D. Weber;James H. Dwyer

  • Effects of 2 prevention programs on high-risk behaviors among African American youth: A randomized trial

    Brian R. Flay;Sally Graumlich;Eisuke Segawa;James L. Burns

  • The Persistence of Experimentally Induced Attitude Change

    Thomas D. Cook;Brian R. Flay

  • Role of the media in influencing trajectories of youth smoking

    Melanie Wakefield;Brian Flay;Mark Nichter;Gary Giovino

  • Parenting Style and Adolescent Depressive Symptoms, Smoking, and Academic Achievement: Ethnic, Gender, and SES Differences

    Barbara Radziszewska;Jean L. Richardson;Clyde W. Dent;Brain R. Flay

  • Mediating Mechanisms in a School-Based Drug Prevention Program: First-Year Effects of the Midwestern Prevention Project

    D P MacKinnon;C A Johnson;M A Pentz;J H Dwyer

  • Helping Adolescents at Risk: Prevention of Multiple Problem Behaviors

    A Biglan;PA Brennan;SL Foster;HD Holder

  • Affective and social influences approaches to the prevention of multiple substance abuse among seventh grade students: Results from project SMART

    William B. Hansen;C.Anderson Johnson;Brian R. Flay;John W. Graham

  • A multicommunity trial for primary prevention of adolescent drug abuse: Effects on drug use prevalence

    M. A. Pentz;J. H. Dwyer;D. P. MacKinnon;B. R. Flay

Frequent Co-Authors

Steve Sussman
Steve Sussman University of Southern California
Clyde W. Dent
Clyde W. Dent University of Southern California
William B. Hansen
William B. Hansen University of North Carolina at Greensboro
Alan W. Stacy
Alan W. Stacy Claremont Graduate University
C. Anderson Johnson
C. Anderson Johnson Claremont Graduate University
Alan C. Acock
Alan C. Acock Oregon State University
Donald Hedeker
Donald Hedeker University of Chicago
Mary Ann Pentz
Mary Ann Pentz University of Southern California
Robin J. Mermelstein
Robin J. Mermelstein University of Illinois at Chicago
Sherry Emery
Sherry Emery University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to a variety of online programs and rewarding career pathways, especially in the growing field of social work. Whether you’re interested in counseling, community outreach, or case management, understanding the specific education requirements in your state is crucial.

For those considering social work, keep in mind that educational requirements can vary significantly. For instance, the social worker education requirements in Kentucky typically require at least a bachelor's degree in social work (BSW) for entry-level roles, while clinical positions may mandate a master’s degree. Similarly, the social worker education requirements in Louisiana specify different degree levels depending on the career track and licensing sought.

Students in Maine should be aware that the Maine minimum degree requirement for social workers is also a BSW, while more advanced roles often require further graduate study. In contrast, the social worker education requirements in Maryland highlight the need for a master’s degree for clinical licensure, which can open the door to higher-paying positions and specialization.

If you are considering studying psychology in the USA, reviewing these requirements can help you choose the right online degree program and professional pathway based on your goals and location.

Best Scientists Citing Brian R. Flay

Recently Published Articles