World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 72 2074 1883 1203 1066 194 17910

Chih-Ping Chou publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Chih-Ping Chou between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Chih-Ping Chou published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2011. 3 of the 215 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2011. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 3 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 2 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 7 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 15 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 11 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 3 publications
1982 2025

215 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Chih-Ping Chou: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 0
1987 1
1988 2
1989 1
1990 3
1991 1
1992 1
1993 2
1994 1
1995 1
1996 2
1997 1
1998 7
1999 1
2000 1
2001 3
2002 3
2003 8
2004 10
2005 7
2006 10
2007 9
2008 6
2009 10
2010 15
2011 16
2012 10
2013 11
2014 6
2015 11
2016 9
2017 10
2018 7
2019 8
2020 6
2021 7
2022 1
2023 2
2024 0
2025 3
Total 215
Download as CSV

Chih-Ping Chou publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chih-Ping Chou sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 191–200 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 194 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343 194
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Chih-Ping Chou D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chih-Ping Chou sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 72–73 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183 72
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Chih-Ping Chou is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States and specializes primarily in Psychology, with a notable focus on Clinical Psychology. Their research spans multiple intersecting fields including Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis; Sociology and Political Science; General Health Professions; and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

Their main research topics cover a diverse array of social and health-related issues. These topics include:

  • Homelessness and Social Issues
  • Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Climate Change and Health Impacts
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Chou has contributed to several peer-reviewed publications, including recent papers such as:

  • "Longitudinal Assessment of the Relationships Between Geriatric Conditions and Loneliness," 2020, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
  • "Incarceration Trajectories of Women Who Are Mothers: A Nationally Representative Study of State and Federal Prisoners," 2020, Crime & Delinquency
  • "Maternal Incarceration Trajectories and the Intergenerational Transmission of Imprisonment: A Nationwide Study," 2020, Children and Youth Services Review
  • "Incarceration Trajectories and Mental Health Problems Among Mothers Imprisoned in State and Federal Correctional Facilities: A Nationwide Study," 2021, International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
  • "Determinants of Purchase Intentions for Social Enterprise Products: Online Consumers' Perceptions of Two Agricultural Social Enterprises in Taiwan," 2022, Journal of Social Entrepreneurship

Their frequent coauthors include Qianwei Zhao, Alice Cepeda, Avelardo Valdez, David S. Black, and Julia E. Rager. The recurring collaboration with these researchers reflects a multidisciplinary approach within their domain.

Chou's publications are often featured in journals such as:

  • Children and Youth Services Review
  • International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction
  • Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
  • Crime & Delinquency
  • Journal of Social Entrepreneurship

Chou has also contributed to the academic book literature, with a publication titled "China's Peril and Promise" released by Princeton University Press in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Estimates and tests in structural equation modeling.

    Chih-Ping Chou;Peter M. Bentler

  • Scaled test statistics and robust standard errors for non-normal data in covariance structure analysis: a Monte Carlo study.

    Chih-Ping Chou;P. M. Bentler;Albert Satorra

  • Model Modification in Covariance Structure Modeling: A Comparison among Likelihood Ratio, Lagrange Multiplier, and Wald Tests.

    Chih-Ping Chou;P.M. Bentler

  • Effectiveness of a lifestyle intervention in promoting the well-being of independently living older people: results of the Well Elderly 2 Randomised Controlled Trial

    Florence Clark;Jeanne Jackson;Mike Carlson;Chih Ping Chou

  • Physical Activity in US Youth: Effect of Race/Ethnicity, Age, Gender, and Weight Status

    Britni R. Belcher;David Berrigan;Kevin W. Dodd;B. Adar Emken

  • Adolescent affiliations and adiposity: a social network analysis of friendships and obesity.

    Thomas W. Valente;Kayo Fujimoto;Chih Ping Chou;Donna Spruijt-Metz

  • Parallel developmental trajectories of sensation seeking and regular substance use in adolescents.

    Anne M. Crawford;Mary Ann Pentz;Chih-Ping Chou;Chaoyang Li

  • Perceived stress, depression and food consumption frequency in the college students of China Seven Cities.

    Chunhong Liu;Chunhong Liu;Bin Xie;Chih-Ping Chou;Carol Koprowski

  • Psychosocial Factors Associated With Adolescent Electronic Cigarette and Cigarette Use

    Jessica L. Barrington-Trimis;Kiros Berhane;Jennifer B. Unger;Tess Boley Cruz

  • Effect of brief safer-sex counseling by medical providers to HIV-1 seropositive patients: a multi-clinic assessment.

    Jean L Richardson;Joel Milam;Allen McCutchan;Susan Stoyanoff

  • Cognitive motivations for drug use among adolescents: Longitudinal tests of gender differences and predictors of change in drug use.

    Michael D. Newcomb;Chih-ping Chou;P. M. Bentler;G. J. Huba

  • Parental substance use as a modifier of adolescent substance use risk

    Chaoyang Li;Mary Ann Pentz;Chih-Ping Chou

  • Collaborative Care Management of Major Depression Among Low-Income, Predominantly Hispanic Subjects With Diabetes: A randomized controlled trial

    Kathleen Ell;Wayne Katon;Bin Xie;Pey Jiuan Lee

  • BMI as a moderator of perceived stress and emotional eating in adolescents.

    Selena T. Nguyen-Rodriguez;Chih-Ping Chou;Jennifer B. Unger;Donna Spruijt-Metz

  • Perceived peer influence and peer selection on adolescent smoking.

    Beth R. Hoffman;Peter R. Monge;Chih-Ping Chou;Thomas W. Valente

  • Utility of the theory of reasoned action and theory of planned behavior for predicting Chinese adolescent smoking.

    Qian Guo;C. Anderson Johnson;Jennifer B. Unger;Liming Lee

  • SAS and SPSS macros to calculate standardized Cronbach's alpha using the upper bound of the phi coefficient for dichotomous items.

    Wei Sun;Chih-Ping Chou;Alan W. Stacy;Huiyan Ma

  • Longitudinal Relations Among Depression, Stress, and Coping in High Risk Youth

    Elisha R. Galaif;Steve Sussman;Chih-Ping Chou;Thomas A. Wills

  • Effects of a community-based prevention program on decreasing drug use in high-risk adolescents

    C P Chou;S Montgomery;M A Pentz;L A Rohrbach

  • Executive cognitive function and food intake in children.

    Nathaniel R. Riggs;Donna Spruijt-Metz;Kari-Lyn Sakuma;Chih-Ping Chou

  • Weight perception and weight-related sociocultural and behavioral factors in Chinese adolescents.

    Bin Xie;Chih-Ping Chou;Donna Spruijt-Metz;Kim Reynolds

Frequent Co-Authors

Jennifer B. Unger
Jennifer B. Unger University of Southern California
Mary Ann Pentz
Mary Ann Pentz University of Southern California
Donna Spruijt-Metz
Donna Spruijt-Metz University of Southern California
C. Anderson Johnson
C. Anderson Johnson Claremont Graduate University
Paula H. Palmer
Paula H. Palmer Claremont Graduate University
Bin Xie
Bin Xie Claremont Graduate University
Nathaniel R. Riggs
Nathaniel R. Riggs Colorado State University
Peggy Gallaher
Peggy Gallaher University of Southern California
Ping Sun
Ping Sun University of Southern California
Stanley P. Azen
Stanley P. Azen University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a wide array of online programs and related career paths, including social work, counseling, and behavioral health. Many students choose to specialize or move into adjacent fields, often requiring licensure or additional education based on state regulations.

For example, if you are interested in becoming a social worker, it’s important to research state-specific requirements. Those planning to practice in New Jersey can review New Jersey social work license requirements. Students looking at opportunities in the Southwest should examine New Mexico social work education requirements.

The process can differ in other locations. If you’d like to work in the Northeast, familiarize yourself with the steps for becoming a social worker in New York. Similarly, the Southeast has its own standards—review North Carolina social work education requirements before applying to programs or jobs there.

Understanding these pathways ensures you choose the right online degree and stay on track for your desired career in psychology or social work.

Best Scientists Citing Chih-Ping Chou

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles