World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
61
Citations
16210
World Ranking
3351
National Ranking
1891

Harold D. Grotevant publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harold D. Grotevant sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 180 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Harold D. Grotevant D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Harold D. Grotevant sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1989 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Harold D. Grotevant is affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Amherst in the United States. Their research encompasses a range of topics primarily within the social sciences and medicine, with a particular focus on child welfare, adoption, and reproductive health.

Their body of work is characterized by investigations into issues related to child welfare and adoption, reproductive health and technologies, assisted reproductive technology and twin pregnancy, family dynamics and relationships, ethics and legal issues in pediatric healthcare, attachment and relationship dynamics, and child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development.

Harold D. Grotevant has contributed to the academic community with publications in a variety of venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Fertility and Sterility
  • Family Relations
  • Journal of Family Psychology
  • Adoption Quarterly
  • Parenting

Their recent papers reflect a continued focus on adoption and family dynamics. Notable papers include:

  • Adoptive Parenting Cognitions: Acknowledgement of Differences as a Predictor of Adolescents' Attachment to Parents, 2020, Parenting
  • Parents' experiences telling children conceived by gamete and embryo donation about their genetic origins, 2021, F&S Reports
  • Adoptive Parenting Cognitions in the Era of Open Adoption: Is Shared Fate Theory Still Relevant?, 2021, Family Relations
  • Tech-Mediated and Traditional Communication Modes in Adult Adoptees' Contact With Birth Parents, 2020, Family Relations
  • Unsettled adoptive identity: Understanding relationship challenges in adopted adolescents' identity narratives, 2023, Family Process

Their frequent collaborators have included:

  • Patricia E. Hershberger
  • Agatha M. Gallo
  • Kirby Adlam
  • Martha Driessnack
  • Susan C. Klock

Harold D. Grotevant's main fields of study include social sciences and medicine, with subfields covering safety research, pediatrics, perinatology and child health, reproductive medicine, sociology and political science, and demography.

Among honors received, they were named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1989.

Best Publications

  • Individuation in Family Relationships

    Harold D. Grotevant;Catherine R. Cooper

  • Patterns of interaction in family relationships and the development of identity exploration in adolescence.

    Harold D. Grotevant;Catherine R. Cooper

  • Toward a Process Model of Identity Formation

    Harold D. Grotevant

  • Individuality and connectedness in the family as a context for adolescent identity formation and role-taking skill.

    Catherine R. Cooper;Harold D. Grotevant;Sherri M. Condon

  • Adolescent development in family contexts.

    Harold D. Grotevant

  • Development of an objective measure to assess ego identity in adolescence: Validation and replication.

    Harold D. Grotevant;Gerald R. Adams

  • An Exploratory Study about Inaccuracy and Invalidity in Adolescent Self-Report Surveys

    Xitao Fan;Brent C. Miller;Kyung-Eun Park;Bryan W. Winward

  • Adoptive Identity: How Contexts Within and Beyond the Family Shape Developmental Pathways*

    Harold D. Grotevant;Nora Dunbar;Julie K. Kohler;Amy M. Lash Esau

  • International adoption of institutionally reared children: research and policy.

    Megan R. Gunnar;Jacqueline Bruce;Harold D. Grotevant

  • An extension of Marcia's Identity Status Interview into the interpersonal domain.

    Harold D. Grotevant;William Thorbecke;Margaret L. Meyer

  • Coming to Terms with Adoption: The Construction of Identity from Adolescence into Adulthood

    Harold D. Grotevant

  • Openness in Adoption: Exploring Family Connections.

    Harold D. Grotevant;Ruth G. McRoy

  • Cultural Socialization in Families With Internationally Adopted Children

    Richard M. Lee;Harold D. Grotevant;Wendy L. Hellerstedt;Megan R. Gunnar

  • Comparisons of adopted and nonadopted adolescents in a large, nationally representative sample.

    Brent C. Miller;Xitao Fan;Mathew Christensen;Harold D. Grotevant

  • Assigned and chosen identity components: A process perspective on their integration.

    Harold D. Grotevant

  • Family assessment: A guide to methods and measures.

    Harold D. Grotevant;Cindy I. Carlson

  • The Stories that Families Tell: Narrative Coherence, Narrative Interaction, and Relationship Beliefs

    Barbara H. Fiese;Arnold J. Sameroff;Harold D. Grotevant;Frederick S. Wamboldt

  • The International Adoption Project: Population-based Surveillance of Minnesota Parents Who Adopted Children Internationally

    Wendy L. Hellerstedt;Nikki J. Madsen;Megan R. Gunnar;Harold D. Grotevant

  • Adopted Adolescents' Overrepresentation in Mental Health Counseling: Adoptees' Problems or Parents' Lower Threshold for Referral?

    Brent C. Miller;Xitao Fan;Harold D. Grotevant;Mathew Christensen

  • Individuality and connectedness in adolescent development: Review and prospects for research on identity, relationships, and context.

    Harold D. Grotevant;Catherine R. Cooper

  • Genetic and Environmental Influences on Vocational Interests Assessed Using Adoptive and Biological Families and Twins Reared Apart and Together

    Deborah G. Betsworth;Deborah G. Betsworth;Thomas J. Bouchard Jr.;Catherine R. Cooper;Harold D. Grotevant

Frequent Co-Authors

Ruth G. McRoy
Ruth G. McRoy The University of Texas at Austin
Megan R. Gunnar
Megan R. Gunnar University of Minnesota
Manfred H. M. van Dulmen
Manfred H. M. van Dulmen Kent State University
Brent C. Miller
Brent C. Miller Utah State University
Xitao Fan
Xitao Fan Chinese University of Hong Kong
Jerica M. Berge
Jerica M. Berge University of Minnesota
Richard M. Lee
Richard M. Lee University of Minnesota
Sandra Scarr
Sandra Scarr Yale University
Femmie Juffer
Femmie Juffer Leiden University
Marian J. Bakermans-Kranenburg
Marian J. Bakermans-Kranenburg ISPA - University Institute of Psychological, Social and Life Sciences

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA opens doors to a variety of career pathways, from counseling and human resources to research and clinical practice. Choosing the right program is crucial, especially with so many options across different locations. For example, you can find the best psychology degree programs ranking in Virginia to compare top schools and their offerings.

If you're considering a specific city, local rankings can help tailor your search. The best psychology program rankings in Virginia Beach and the best psychology degree rankings in Waco provide insights on programs with strong academic outcomes and student support.

For those interested in opportunities in major metropolitan areas, exploring the top psychology programs in Washington, D.C. gives a snapshot of institutions with excellent faculty and diverse career connections. By researching different locations and their specialized offerings, students can align their online studies with long-term career goals in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Harold D. Grotevant

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles